• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Fat Fuck Lazy Pioneer Sinkie Could Be Jailed 20 Years For Being Mischievous 20 Times! Bastard Swapped Luggage Tags Of SIA And Silk Air Passengers!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
colin0bh2-26.jpg


SINGAPORE - Feeling aggrieved at his company for not helping to ease his workload, a baggage handler at Changi Airport Terminal 2 decided to swop the baggage tags of 286 bags belonging to Singapore Airlines and SilkAir passengers.

The bags later arrived at places other than their intended destinations.

As a result, the two carriers had to make compensation payouts totalling more than $42,000 to 221 affected passengers as of Oct 1 this year.

In what is believed to be the first case of its kind, Tay Boon Keh, who is no longer working as a baggage handler, pleaded guilty in court to 20 counts of mischief on his 65th birthday on Friday (Oct 26).

Another 266 similar charges will be considered during sentencing.

He committed the offences between Nov 8, 2016, and Feb 6 last year.

The court heard that Tay had been employed by industrial equipment supplier Lian Cheng Contracting, a subcontractor of the Changi Airport Group.

He started work on Sept 7, 2016, and was deployed to the Explosives Detection System (EDS) X-Ray machine at Belt 5-7 later that month.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Thiam Jia Min said the machine had frequent power failures and broke down several times a day.

When this happened, Tay had to carry travellers' bags off Belt 5-7 and move them for screening at another machine at Belt 7-5 about 6m away.

Tay complained to his supervisor that it was physically tiring to carry the bags around.

However, as manpower at Lian Cheng Contracting was limited at that time, additional staff were not deployed to the EDS X-Ray machine at Belt 5-7, the court heard.

DPP Thiam told District Judge Jasvender Kaur: "Finally, out of frustration and anger at Lian Cheng, the accused came up with a plan to swop the baggage tags attached to the luggage bags that he handled with other baggage tags. The accused was alone when he performed the swopping of the tags, and he did it at an area which was out of CCTV view."

The DPP said Tay knew that by swopping the baggage tags, the affected bags would be sent to the wrong locations.

She added: "Nevertheless, the accused persisted in committing the acts intending to bring about inconvenience to his employer, Lian Cheng, and make Changi Airport Group aware of the manpower shortage and X-Ray machine breakdown issues, so that it could do something to rectify the situation."

His offences came to light after an employee from ground handling company Sats received e-mails from Singapore Airlines and SilkAir representatives, stating that some of their passengers' baggage tags had been tampered with.

The Sats employee lodged a police report on Dec 7, 2016.


DPP Thiam said Tay eventually stopped swopping travellers' baggage tags in February last year as his actions had not resulted in additional manpower being deployed to assist him.

Defence lawyers Senior Counsel Lok Vi Ming and Tang Jin Sheng are representing him pro bono and the case has been adjourned for a pre-trial conference on Nov 1.

The Straits Times contacted Lian Cheng Contracting on Friday and was told that it "cannot reveal anything" about the case.

For each count of mischief, offenders can be jailed for up to a year and fined.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...s-swopping-tags-of-286-bags-at-changi-airport
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Cut cost
Frequent machine failure continue let it fail
Making use old folks carry luggages
65yrs lao hero shd not take things into his own hands not the innocent passengers fault.:biggrin:
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Your bag travelled from Bangkok to Singapore & then to Dhaka & then back....ha ha ha.... not SATS fault...it is the sub-contractor fault...then it is not the sub contractor fault..it the contractor they hire fault...nobody up there in the food chain is at fault....it is the lazy, old fogger, good for nothing fault.

The same principle you can apply to the whities elected into parliament...
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What a lazy irresponsible guy! He should be tagged and sent to Afghanistan or Syria to get some exercise!
 

Bonut

Alfrescian
Loyal
If SATS had employed their own staff with established salary structure and fringe benefits, the staff would never have done such a thing however unhappy he might have been with his bosses. Instead, SATS outsources them to contractors who pay their workers $4.50 per hour with zero fringe benefits. The disgruntled staff must have felt he had nothing to lose.

Does SATS even check the background of the staff employed by the contractors ? The airport is such a sensitive place.
 
Last edited:

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
colin0bh2-26.jpg


SINGAPORE - Feeling aggrieved at his company for not helping to ease his workload, a baggage handler at Changi Airport Terminal 2 decided to swop the baggage tags of 286 bags belonging to Singapore Airlines and SilkAir passengers.

The bags later arrived at places other than their intended destinations.

As a result, the two carriers had to make compensation payouts totalling more than $42,000 to 221 affected passengers as of Oct 1 this year.

In what is believed to be the first case of its kind, Tay Boon Keh, who is no longer working as a baggage handler, pleaded guilty in court to 20 counts of mischief on his 65th birthday on Friday (Oct 26).

Another 266 similar charges will be considered during sentencing.

He committed the offences between Nov 8, 2016, and Feb 6 last year.

The court heard that Tay had been employed by industrial equipment supplier Lian Cheng Contracting, a subcontractor of the Changi Airport Group.

He started work on Sept 7, 2016, and was deployed to the Explosives Detection System (EDS) X-Ray machine at Belt 5-7 later that month.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Thiam Jia Min said the machine had frequent power failures and broke down several times a day.

When this happened, Tay had to carry travellers' bags off Belt 5-7 and move them for screening at another machine at Belt 7-5 about 6m away.

Tay complained to his supervisor that it was physically tiring to carry the bags around.

However, as manpower at Lian Cheng Contracting was limited at that time, additional staff were not deployed to the EDS X-Ray machine at Belt 5-7, the court heard.

DPP Thiam told District Judge Jasvender Kaur: "Finally, out of frustration and anger at Lian Cheng, the accused came up with a plan to swop the baggage tags attached to the luggage bags that he handled with other baggage tags. The accused was alone when he performed the swopping of the tags, and he did it at an area which was out of CCTV view."

The DPP said Tay knew that by swopping the baggage tags, the affected bags would be sent to the wrong locations.

She added: "Nevertheless, the accused persisted in committing the acts intending to bring about inconvenience to his employer, Lian Cheng, and make Changi Airport Group aware of the manpower shortage and X-Ray machine breakdown issues, so that it could do something to rectify the situation."

His offences came to light after an employee from ground handling company Sats received e-mails from Singapore Airlines and SilkAir representatives, stating that some of their passengers' baggage tags had been tampered with.

The Sats employee lodged a police report on Dec 7, 2016.

DPP Thiam said Tay eventually stopped swopping travellers' baggage tags in February last year as his actions had not resulted in additional manpower being deployed to assist him.

Defence lawyers Senior Counsel Lok Vi Ming and Tang Jin Sheng are representing him pro bono and the case has been adjourned for a pre-trial conference on Nov 1.

The Straits Times contacted Lian Cheng Contracting on Friday and was told that it "cannot reveal anything" about the case.

For each count of mischief, offenders can be jailed for up to a year and fined.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...s-swopping-tags-of-286-bags-at-changi-airport

This should NOT be a criminal case. It is strictly between employer and employee. Employer can fire him and then sue him. Guess the PAP has to create job for the poodles and the kangaroo judges.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The fat fuck loser bears a striking resemblance to oppie kin lian. I wonder if they are related?
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If SATS had employed their own staff with established salary structure and fringe benefits, the staff would never have done such a thing however unhappy he might have been with his bosses. Instead, SATS outsources them to contractors who pay their workers $4.50 per hour with zero fringe benefits. The disgruntled staff must have felt he had nothing to lose.

Does SATS even check the background of the staff employed by the contractors ? The airport is such a sensitive place.

That is why are security system here is leaky...if any terrorists smart enough to their homework...all you need is one or sub-sub-sub contractor's disgruntled employees who is already over the hill going to the mortuary, have nothing lose...to carry out their deeds. Look for disgruntled employees...
 
Top