Evil Bayi can tell stories well

[winnipegjets]

Ngerng insincere, exploited lawsuit, says lawyer

Blogger Roy Ngerng was yesterday accused not only of being insincere in his repeated apologies to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for having defamed him, but also of exploiting the lawsuit to score political points and get more people to read his blog.

It is the Bayi who is exploiting the lawsuit and weaving a story to paint LHL as the victim. Only fools will believe the most powerful man in sinkapore is the victim of a jobless man.

Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, in making the point, said Mr Ngerng's motives were evident from his "purely tactical" moves in deliberately and repeatedly perpetuating the libel even after receiving a lawyer's letter of demand to take down the defamatory blog post.

The Bayi contends that everything Ordinary Roy (OR) writes about the CPF is libel. OR made the apology, took down the defamatory post and yet that was not sufficient for the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi. They want him to shut up and say or write anything. OR refused. That's why they are seeking the LARGEST amount possible. No words of contempt can described the MOST POWERFUL man and the Bayi.

Mr Singh, who is representing Mr Lee, also pointed out that Mr Ngerng, 34, had on repeated occasions tried to mislead Mr Lee, readers of his blog The Heart Truths, and even his own lawyers in his actions, adding: "Every time you get caught, you apologise out of convenience. But you carry on doing what you always intended to do."

Gosh, the Bayi wants sinkees to believe that the MOST POWERFUL man is easily misled. Goodness me, the MOST EXPENSIVE PM in the world is so dumb. What kind of lawyer is the Bayi? He portrays LHL as stupid, a poor victim that deserves our utmost sympathy. Yet he is the MOST POWERFUL man in sinkapore. It is a total contradiction!

PAP likes to talk in generalites because the details will always show up their lies.

Mr Ngerng deleted the libellous post and apologised, but Mr Singh, in arguing for aggravated damages, cited how his actions since then displayed a deep and intense malice towards Mr Lee.

This is a new precedent ...hating someone is equivalent to libel. The Bayi is writing a new law if the judge agrees with him. Then sinkees must never express their hatred or dislike for the PAP elites or face libel suit.
That explains why Amos is in jail. He expressed hatred for Lee CONs You.

Mr. Ngerng also taunted Mr Singh, saying he "has not succeeded in teasing the evidence out of my mouth", and warned him against conflating what he said were two separate issues: the defamation suit, and his allegations of government wrongdoing in the management of CPF funds.

Commoner versus the MOST POWERFUL man and the EVIL BAYI. The winner is Ordinary Roy.
The MOST POWERFUL man didn't want to hear or see any critcism on the CPF issues (concerns raised have yet to be addressed by the government and the MOST POWERFUL man). That's why he went after Ordinary Roy with a vengeance that is no different from any despotic ruler.
Two different issues, yet the BAYI muddles them up. Senior Counsel, supposedly the best in sinkapore. Shows how low our standards are.

Over the course of the day, Roy challenged the Government to sue him on at least five occasions, if it takes offence at his articles.

And the government didn't because there was NO basis.
Wah, Ordinary Roy really put the EVIL BAYI to shame.

While Mr Ngerng said he was petrified and anxious when he got the letter, Mr Singh pointed out that his purported feelings were not in line with his publication of the letter and the tone of his blog post. -

BAYI is now a psychologist and literary critic ...how does he substantiate his claims? Lawyers here don't bother to do their homework because they know we have kangaroo courts.

The article contained such statements as: "I have tried my best to advocate for my fellow citizens. However, today, I am sued by the very Government which should be protecting its citizens, such as me. This is disappointing."
This, Mr Singh said, showed how Mr Ngerng wanted to "further twist the knife". The article remains online - when the blogger has had the full awareness of its repercussions - speaking volumes of Mr Ngerng's real intentions, he added.

How does that statement 'twist the knife'? Roy was just stating the fact.
Of course, the article remains online as it was not yet the deadline to remove it. Should Roy be penalized for adhering to the deadline imposed by the MOST POWERFUL Man.

Mr Ngerng also produced a YouTube video, which got nearly 35,000 views, in which he said: "I do not regret what I have done." But he said this was in the context of him speaking on CPF and not defamation. Mr Singh pointed out that while the blogger promised Mr Lee he would delete the video, he instead made it private and shared it with four other people, who he was seeking advice from on its content. But Mr Ngerng said: "Privatising it is as good as it being removed, because it has been removed from public viewing except myself." The video was eventually removed.

Setting it to private is as good as taking it down. Bayi should explain why it is not. And Roy shared it for a reason, to seek clarification on its content. How is that libel??????
So, sharing with 4 people is considered as making it public? Roy was not allowed to talk about the CPF issue to anyone as well? Using the same logic, that would be considered as making his views public?
What is wrong with express your discontent with a government programme or policy?
Roy was complying as much as he could until the demands were totally unreasonable.

Mr Ngerng added that he had gone above and beyond what he should do in deleting the video and four other articles at Mr Lee's request. He maintained they were not defamatory, saying he complied as he "didn't want to aggravate the hurt and distress and embarrassment the PM would feel".

We have a WEAK PM who is easily hurt, distressed and embarrassment. Please send him your love and support on his FB page and via twitter.

Yet, to draw the attention of local and international media to his case, he e-mailed more than 70 journalists a link to another site that had reproduced his defamatory article, a link to his public apology and the letter of demand on his blog.
Mr Ngerng said that by including the apology, he had negated the effect of the offensive post.

Roy wanted the media to know that he had apologized to the MOST POWERFUL man. Of course the offensive post had to publish itself to provide context.
Bayi is very confused ...he doesn't know basic facts.

He also rejected Mr Singh's charge that he was "consumed with a desire to promote" himself. Mr Singh had cited the blogger's marketing background, making him adept at "effective messaging", but Mr Ngerng said he never wanted to be popular. "It is because the PM sued me that I was forced to become the face of CPF. If the Government takes good care of Singaporeans, I will be happy to stop writing, and I will be more than happy to be a waiter or a cleaner," he said.

Gosh, TTSH had fired a real talent, given the high regard of Roy's talent by the MOST POWERFUL man and the BAYI.
See the contradiction in their portrayal of OR.

 

[winnipegjets]

This is an extract of the exchange in the High Court yesterday when Senior Counsel Davinder Singh (DS) was cross-examining blogger Roy Ngerng (RN).

Davinder Singh: I suggest to you, Mr Ngerng, that the word "apology" is completely meaningless to you. Do you agree or disagree?

Roy Ngerng: I do not agree...

DS: Every time you get caught, you apologise for convenience, but you carry on doing what you have always intended to do.

RN: No, that is not true.

DS: We have seen from your conduct, in less than 10 days from the date of the (letter of) demand - May 18 to May 27 - that when you were caught libelling, you apologised. But you continued to post the letter of demand with the offending words. When you were caught with the YouTube video, you apologised, but you privatised it and sent it out to editors. When you were caught with the e-mails, you apologised, and you said it was a momentary lapse of judgment, when today you accept that it wasn't.

RN: Huh? I said it was.

DS: In this court, you have used the word apology so many times that, really Mr Ngerng, it's quite clear that it's purely tactical and completely insincere.

RN: I disagree... As the PM admitted (on Tuesday), the four articles and YouTube video did not mention his name in a defamatory light, nor the allegation. The two e-mails (to the media) also referred to corruption or the Government's use of CPF funds. It was not about Mr Lee's use of CPF funds. In the first e-mail, there is a link... to the re-publication of the offending words and images and for that I have apologised... (Roy shouldn't apologize as it was done so to provide context to readers.)

The apology remains. As much as I acknowledge the four articles and video are not aggravating and do not repeat the libel, I took them down because I did not want to aggravate the issue.

The e-mails refer to the corruption in the Government. But we panicked because the Government, the PM sent another e-mail and we did not want him to think that we wanted to aggravate the issue. That's why I also sent that letter to apologise. See how LHL kept hounding OR. An interesting point is that the BAYI did not correct OR for using 'Government'. Is this an acknowlegment that this lawsuit is made by the PM, not LHL? So, the BAYI's fees is paid by our tax dollars. We should ask why does the Government need to use an expensive private lawyer when there are equally capable people in the AG's office? Did the AG tell LHL that they don't have a case?

At no point was the apology less sincere. Because... I do not believe, I mean, there's no way I can prove it, except to say I do not believe Mr Lee has ever misappropriated CPF funds because I do not have evidence of that. I am not going to make any allegation of that... I am telling you here, now, there is still no intent with wanting to say it was Mr Lee who was using our CPF funds...
Comment: OR is pointing out the obvious. Until we have whistleblowers, we won't be able to get the skeletons out of the closets.

I would draw the line between the Government's use of CPF funds and what I say about how the Government uses it, with how you want to insinuate that I'm talking about the PM. Because they are two very separate things. Just as how the defamatory suit and the CPF are two very separate things.

What a waste of talent. OR should have been a lawyer. If in UK, he would be a high-flying one.

So please let us keep the line clear because if you keep crossing (it), sometimes I miss it; I admit to something, then I make myself look guilty when I'm actually admitting to something that I should not be admitting.
Comment: OR makes BAYI looked like a fool; in other courts, BAYI would be skewered by the press. Mediocre lawyers like BAYI can only survive in sinkapore.

 

[unclesam]

bayi and bayi bitch are wicked,
see the bayi bitch deal with the little boy sent to IMH

 

[Leckmichamarsch]

bayi and bayi bitch are wicked,
see the bayi bitch deal with the little boy sent to IMH

bayee oso ah neh n we know ah nehs are shit skin