Chitchat Errr... yehhh ... ghosts of the past is haunting LKY today...

[tanwahtiu]

Do u think LKY was a racist....

1. Want to beat up Chinese with a hatchet meet at cul de sac...

2. Split Malays and Indians kampong living lifestyle using HBD...

3. Many ministers are ahnehs...

4. Like to carry AMDK balls, and treat them like God... buy billions $$$ of their gunboats to aim at the neighbors Malai kia...

5.... ummmhhh what else...

 

[nayr69sg]

Do u think LKY was a racist....

1. Want to beat up Chinese with a hatchet meet at cul de sac...

2. Split Malays and Indians kampong living lifestyle using HBD...

3. Many ministers are ahnehs...

4. Like to carry AMDK balls, and treat them like God... buy billions $$$ of their gunboats to aim at the neighbors Malai kia...

5.... ummmhhh what else...

LKY was pro China pro CCP

He was also pro USA.

So you will probably love him and hate him .

 

[Sideswipe]

LKY had just 1 principle or value in his life that was to have no principle or value. he simply was an opportunist and leaned towards different sides at what he believed to be the right time - pro British, pro Japanese, pro British again, anti colonialist, pro Communist, anti Communist, pro China, pro USA. his political stance was like Sichuan bian lian, changing very fast one.

 

[laksaboy]

LKY was just a political opportunist. The good Tunku saw through his bluff and got rid of him.

 

[laksaboy]

LKY had just 1 principle or value in his life that was to have no principle or value. he simply was an opportunist and leaned towards different sides at what he believed to be the right time - pro British, pro Japanese, pro British again, anti colonialist, pro Communist, anti Communist, pro China, pro USA. his political stance was like Sichuan bian lian, changing very fast one.

That's why Kissinger was his buddy. Birds of a feather flock together. Realpolitik matters, values be damned.

Unless of course, you start spouting about 'Confucian values', which in reality was a thinly veiled threat to Sinkies to submit to authority.

Essential reading:
http://www.cafefle.org/texteskkkmg-icc_articles/13_Singapore_26p-Pol copie.pdf

 

[laksaboy]

Here's another good one:

http://www.cafefle.org/texteskkkmg-icc_articles/13_Singapore_25p-Pol copie.pdf

(Page 88)
The most important decisions of national significance are left in the hands of
technocratic political leaders and policy makers, often in conditions of jealously
guarded confidentiality but sometimes in highly selective consultation with trusted
experts, all under the assumption that ordinary Singaporeans would be ill-equipped
to discuss such matters. ... argues that active citizenship and
engagement remain merely rhetorical and ‘‘gestural,’’ without any genuine
expression in real public life. These justifications, which effectively exclude ordinary
Singaporeans from genuinely participating in public decision making and from the
educative benefits of democratic participation, turn out to be self-fulfilling.
Singaporeans are regularly described as unready for more democracy, particularly
by those who quietly worry that their authority will be threatened by more
democracy.

---
Summary in five words: Totalitarian shithole under the Familee.