• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

EP - Prof Thio SuAnn is correct - PEC is juvenile, unnecessary, unfair system

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
With such powers, the Presidential Elections Committee (PEC) should be legally required to explain why potential candidates get – or do not get – the certificate of eligibility, said constitutional law expert Thio Li-ann.

‘And it shouldn’t be (just) one line,’ she said of the explanation.

The PEC should also interview the candidates before making its decision, she added.

- http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/08/06/call-for-panel-to-explain-why-hopefuls-get-nod-or-dont/
 
Back
Top