Egosurfing - WikiLeaks Reveals Chinese Leaders Googling Themselves

GoFlyKiteNow

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
2,605
Points
0
WikiLeaks Reveals Chinese Leaders Googling Themselves

"Egosurfing," also known as vanity searching, egosearching, egogoogling, autogoogling, self-googling, master-googling, is now officially a geopolitical issue.

The latest WikiLeaks dump includes diplomatic cables about the problems of balancing Google and self-esteem, and how it lead to China's quest to hack and control all of the politically risky information online. Put in more glib terms, everyone Googles their name -- even foreign leaders -- and now we have proof.

There's a larger, serious issue at play here, specifically China's obsession with the internet as a threat to power, but the anecdotes are worth a laugh:

The May 18, 2009, cable, titled "Google China Paying Price for Resisting Censorship," quoted a well-placed source as saying that Li Changchun, a member of China's top ruling body, the Politburo Standing Committee, and the country's senior propaganda official, was taken aback to discover that he could conduct Chinese-language searches on Google's main international Web site.

When Mr. Li typed his name into the search engine at google.com, he found "results critical of him."

Think about it: the line between bad blogger and world leader is eroding by the second, with Hugo Chavez tweeting and a member of the Chinese ruling body biting his fingernails daily before his Google Alert gets delivered. In a way, the blurring of that line -- those who care about the internet and those who do important work -- is exactly what China is afraid of. So they hope to completely take the reins:

The message delivered by the office, the person said, was that "in the past, a lot of officials worried that the Web could not be controlled."

"But through the Google incident and other increased controls and surveillance, like real-name registration, they reached a conclusion: the Web is fundamentally controllable," the person said.

China's demands, the leaked cables show, were wide-reaching:

The demands on Google went well beyond removing material on subjects like the Dalai Lama or the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. Chinese officials also put pressure on the United States government to censor the Google Earth satellite imaging service by lowering the resolution of images of Chinese government facilities, warning that Washington could be held responsible if terrorists used that information to attack government or military facilities, the cables show. Washington dismissed the suggestions.

The entire front page story is worth a read, but when you're done ask yourself this:
If you could remove every mean thing or unflattering photo of yourself from the internet, or at least make it unavailable to everyone who knows or potentially could know you, would you do it? That's what I thought, Communist.
.
 
The inability to take criticism is a chinky trait the world over. It's hardly confined to the PRC.

It's not confined to the leadership either. The low-life Ah Bengs are exactly the same.
 
The inability to take criticism is a chinky trait the world over. It's hardly confined to the PRC.

It's not confined to the leadership either. The low-life Ah Bengs are exactly the same.

Well said

I agree with you totally

Low-life ah bengs like Ramseth and the other fuckers here act like they know everything but in real life, they don't even have education beyond O levels.

Taking criticism is one thing but these sinkie peasants don't improve themselves even if they can take criticism.

That is the difference between the west and the useless Chinese Sinkies - Sinkies simply don't care about life long learning and self-improvement.

What sinkie peasants care about are:
Prostitutes
KTV
Gambling
Downloading illegal things from the net
 
Wikileaks: Chinese Leaders’ Vanity Searches On Google Led To Hacking

Dec 5, 2010 at 10:56am ET by Greg Sterling

I’m almost positive that one day we’ll see “Wikileaks: The Musical” on Broadway (or perhaps the Opera at The Met). There are equal measures of comedy, tragedy and intrigue in the many thousands of documents dumped and disclosed last week. It’s perfect fodder for dramatic adaptation.

And one set of documents that embody all of these dramatic and comedic qualities are those that shed light on the Google hacking incident in China.

In the days and months that followed the incident earlier this year Chinese officials vociferously denied any involvement. At the time it seemed to me that Google’s behavior strongly argued the Chinese were involved despite the denials. Otherwise why would Google refuse to comply with Chinese government policies around censorship if the government itself wasn’t somehow behind the attacks? It would be a strangely inappropriate and even irrational response. But it turns out it wasn’t.

The trove of Wikileaks documents confirm widespread state-sponsored hacking by the Chinese, not just into Google but all over the web and into US agencies and companies in particular. Google is just the proverbial tip of the iceberg or a single instance of a much larger pattern of espionage.

But it wasn’t just about espionage for the Chinese, it was about taming the web and stopping the supposedly democratizing force it represented.

The Chinese have shown that Capitalism and Democracy don’t go hand in hand. They now appear to be showing that the internet can exist in China on their terms, something that many believed was not possible.

Perhaps over time “internet=democracy” boosters will be proven right, but for now the dictators seem to have won.

One interesting question that arises from review of the China-Google Wikileaks documents is: who was more naive, Chinese leaders or Google?

Yet despite the hints of paranoia that appear in some cables, there are also clear signs that Chinese leaders do not consider the Internet an unstoppable force for openness and democracy, as some Americans believe

In fact, this spring, around the time of the Google pullout, China’s State Council Information Office delivered a triumphant report to the leadership on its work to regulate traffic online, according to a crucial Chinese contact cited by the State Department in a cable in early 2010, when contacted directly by The Times.

The message delivered by the office, the person said, was that “in the past, a lot of officials worried that the Web could not be controlled.”

“But through the Google incident and other increased controls and surveillance, like real-name registration, they reached a conclusion: the Web is fundamentally controllable,” the person said.


By the same token the Chinese appear equally naïve in some of these communiques. According to the Times, a May 2009 “cable” titled “Google China Paying Price for Resisting Censorship” showed that Chinese government officials were disturbed after doing vanity searches on Google.com and finding critical material:
 
I am 1000% sure the PAP leaders feel the same way as the CCP leaders. If they could remove all the nasty things people say about them, they would.
 
Well said

I agree with you totally

Low-life ah bengs like Ramseth and the other fuckers here act like they know everything but in real life, they don't even have education beyond O levels.

Taking criticism is one thing but these sinkie peasants don't improve themselves even if they can take criticism.

That is the difference between the west and the useless Chinese Sinkies - Sinkies simply don't care about life long learning and self-improvement.

What sinkie peasants care about are:
Prostitutes
KTV
Gambling
Downloading illegal things from the net

Totally agree!!!! I am still looking forward to those old sinkie farts to reply in posts and threads. Those who think they are the lord of the world and whatever they say means the gospel truth and everyone are expected to go by their so-called form of conduct, even for supporting a party.

I am expected to have tons of fun here. Till now i try to think why they behave like that, i think that is another digusting chinky traits that limits other people's potential while boosting their own selfish ego. It is considered a low life human trait in this modern time.
 
Last edited:
The inability to take criticism is a chinky trait the world over. It's hardly confined to the PRC.

It's not confined to the leadership either. The low-life Ah Bengs are exactly the same.
Sam,u r wrong.

There is one high profile Chinese leader who can take the worst of criticism.

He is president Ma Ying-jeou of ROC-Taiwan
 
ah u's goot o fren, dat flabby o chap, is smart ...

dun allow internet! ... :mad:
 
Well said

That is the difference between the west and the useless Chinese Sinkies - Sinkies simply don't care about life long learning and self-improvement.

What sinkie peasants care about are:
Prostitutes
KTV
Gambling
Downloading illegal things from the net

The sinkies only care about their ego and even talk non-stop just to have an inch above other while they completely Moronised themselves.
 
Well said

I agree with you totally

Low-life ah bengs like Ramseth and the other fuckers here act like they know everything but in real life, they don't even have education beyond O levels.

Taking criticism is one thing but these sinkie peasants don't improve themselves even if they can take criticism.

That is the difference between the west and the useless Chinese Sinkies - Sinkies simply don't care about life long learning and self-improvement.

What sinkie peasants care about are:
Prostitutes
KTV
Gambling
Downloading illegal things from the net

Warning! don't simply criti-arsed the Sinkies often, they are products of old fart's 50 years one- party regime. Indeed you are criti-arse-ing the PAP if you arses Sinkies.
 
It is due to the flawed Confucian teaching of having to respect those in authority and one's elders no matter what the circumstances, leading to the inability to laugh at oneself and reflect on one's shortcomings.
 
Back
Top