• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Criminalising marital rape 'worth looking into'

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
Meaning, husband can be charged for rape if one fine day your wife not happy? She will use her pussy to control husband and deprive him of sex. If he cannot tahan and eat outside, he would commit adultery.

This means more shit for man, getting married means he can be brought to court if the wife thinks he is not providing enough (we know how demanding it can be, I have a friend who earns 5k and his wife demands 3k a month. He still has to pay for everything in the family inculding 2 kids and a family car). On top of that, he cannot demand for sex.

If a woman's past sexual history cannot be used as a reference to her character, means that next time, any woman that accuse a man of rape, he sure die cock stand.

At this rate, women are not asking for equality anymore, they are asking for power to ruleover man.



Law Minister K. Shanmugam said in Parliament on Tuesday that he found the arguments for criminalising marital rape worth looking into.

But as the law that grants immunity to husbands who force their wives to have sex with them is in the Penal Code, it comes under the jurisdiction of the Home Affairs Ministry, not the Law Ministry.

He was replying to Mr Vikram Nair (Sembawang GRC), who advocated the repeal of this law during a debate on amending the Evidence Act to prevent a rape victim's sexual history from being used to discredit her in court.

Mr Nair said the marital rape law was related to the amendment under debate - which Parliament later endorsed - as both disadvantaged the victims of sexual assault.
 
Back
Top