Chris de Souza: PAP MPs do not lack bite!!

hurley

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
1,170
Points
0
As a young Member of Parliament from Singapore's long-ruling People's Action Party (PAP) holding no official government portfolio, Christopher de Souza has perhaps more reason than his peers to prove his relevance as a legislator.

In response to critics who say that PAP MPs are not vocal enough, the 35-year-old lawyer and MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC argued that backbenchers like him put forth their views on issues passionately.

"I've debated things like gambling passionately, I debated the HOTA (Human Organ Transplants Act) passionately, and that's what we are there for," Mr de Souza said.

"We are there to represent the views of the people and request for policy changes, for fine-tuning and for the government to understand the issues on the ground. So, no, I totally disagree that PAP MPs do not have bite."

In an exclusive interview with Yahoo! Singapore, Mr de Souza shared his views on the upcoming General Election (GE) and his plan to help mothers in his constituency.

Electoral contests welcomed

While the next General Election — technically due by 2012 —has yet to be called, Mr de Souza expects it to be a heated contest. He thinks that more Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs) and almost all the Single Member Constituencies (SMCs) might be contested.

He is also likely to face some contest in his own backyard.

In a previous interview, James Gomez of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) had told Yahoo! Singapore that he plans to contest in the Holland-Bukit Timah constituency. In the past few weeks, members of the SDP have also been seen doing their walkabouts around the Bukit Timah Food and Market Centre.

"If SDP would like to come, then we invite them and we will invite the contest," said Mr de Souza.

The Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, which was formed in 2006, comprises of a 5-member team led by Minister Lim Swee Say. It won a walkover or victory in an uncontested race during the last election.

Prior to the 2006 election, the constituency was known as Holland-Bukit Panjang but was then renamed after Bukit Panajng was carved out into an SMC.

While elections are important, Mr de Souza stressed that serving the residents should be the first priority. "We serve the people not with elections in mind. We serve the people because we feel we want to and we want to serve."

When asked whether the PAP MPs are election ready, he said, "I think we are election ready, because it's not about scrambling at the last minute doing all the last minute initiatives."

The youth and mothers

He also highlighted that the party's campaign would still focus on bread and butter issues, such as economy, family, education and defence, all of which have always been its priorities.

With the youth being more educated and demanding greater political openness, Mr De Souza also said that the PAP hopes to further achieve engagement on topical or sensitive issues.

Still, he dismissed claims that the youth are under any climate of fear, saying that he has met young adults who are bold enough to discuss sensitive topics.

"I think you should be free to talk about the aspirations for the country, how to fulfill their dreams, what education they want, what they want for their own children," he said.

While they are encouraged to engage freely in political discourse, he noted that the youth should be respectful of 'outbound markers', especially regarding topics on race and religion.

Expressing concern for the mothers in his constituency, Mr de Souza said his aim is to do more for them, especially for those who are unemployed and fall under the low-income group.

One solution he says is to provide a full-day childcare centre which will allow mothers in the area to find employment and, in turn, contribute to the total household income.

One plan is to introduce a full-day PAP Community Foundation-run childcare centre at one of the void decks in Ghim Moh and another centre in Sunset Way estate to be operated by NTUC.

"So the mothers who want to work can send their children there and work. That can complement the salary of the household income, as well also to give mothers a break," said Mr de Souza.

Nothing like the human touch

Although he acknowledged the importance of social networking tools such as Facebook and Twitter in reaching out to others, Mr de Souza also relies strongly on that human touch to get a feel of his residents' sentiments.

"This is something I feel very strongly about, there's nothing like the human touch, about human interaction. Getting a sense how the person actually is," he said.

"I rely on house and market visits, shaking of a hand, looking at a person in the eye and ask can I help you, what do you need? Is everything all right? Those are some answers that you cannot get from Facebook."

Source: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/blogs/sing...te-christopher-souza-20110322-195554-863.html
 
((Although he acknowledged the importance of social networking tools such as Facebook and Twitter in reaching out to others, Mr de Souza also relies strongly on that human touch to get a feel of his residents' sentiments.

"This is something I feel very strongly about, there's nothing like the human touch, about human interaction. Getting a sense how the person actually is," he said.

"I rely on house and market visits, shaking of a hand, looking at a person in the eye and ask can I help you, what do you need? Is everything all right? Those are some answers that you cannot get from Facebook."))

ehh... is he trying to suan shorty mah for suggesting otherwise. :D
 
Maybe Chris de Souza does not understand that it does not matter how 'passionate' he can represent his ward, nor well-argued his points.

It is how he will vote for/against the issue/resolution, when it is put to the house, that is proof of the pudding.
 
Maybe Chris de Souza does not understand that it does not matter how 'passionate' he can represent his ward, nor well-argued his points.

It is how he will vote for/against the issue/resolution, when it is put to the house, that is proof of the pudding.

I think he understands. He was a Justice's Clerk, some 1st Class Honours from King's College, so he must be well acquainted with Constitutional Law and the Westminster style of Parliament.
 
I recall that Christopher De Souza is the one that rebuked LTK in parliament that lowering GST will help the rich. So by implication, high GST will help the poor. He should fight for additional GST increases so that he can improve the living conditions of the poor.
 
I think he understands. He was a Justice's Clerk, some 1st Class Honours from King's College, so he must be well acquainted with Constitutional Law and the Westminster style of Parliament.

Not only that, his father was also some retired SAF Col. So, he's someone who was born with a silver spoon!
 
"I've debated things like gambling passionately, I debated the HOTA (Human Organ Transplants Act) passionately, and that's what we are there for," Mr de Souza said.

so was he debating for or against the 2 issues?

if "for", then the below statement is a lie:
We are there to represent the views of the people and request for policy changes, for fine-tuning and for the government to understand the issues on the ground.

If he was "against", then this would be false:
So, no, I totally disagree that PAP MPs do not have bite

Empty talk!
 
so was he debating for or against the 2 issues?

if "for", then the below statement is a lie:


If he was "against", then this would be false:


Empty talk!

You have just 'snooked' a King's College trained lawyer.

I have noticed that PAP lawyers have impressive academic credentials, but somehow impressiveness has failed to translate into coherency in speech.

First, it was Michael 'Calamity' Palmer who was dumbstruck by GMS on national TV; then it was followed by a Senior Counsel who, in an attempt to showcase her advocacy skills, pushed her compatriot Calamity Palmer further into the pit.

Now we have a former Justice's Clerk who could not even pack his arguments into one coherent force.

The biggest blunder of all came from a doctor, a Puthu Cherry, who swore to fight for Singapore even though he had never fired a bullet in his life. I doubt he could assemble and disassemble a M16 or AK47.
 
The biggest blunder of all came from a doctor, a Puthu Cherry, who swore to fight for Singapore even though he had never fired a bullet in his life. I doubt he could assemble and disassemble a M16 or AK47.

Their 'fight' mean using their big mouth in international court , non-physical. No need for violence one hor.
 
Aiyo! Politician mah.Talk very big,do time all shrink like mouse. See the PAP in Potong Pasir last election? Say wan to do shelter,then lost time say because he lost he dont wan foot the bill. KNS!

Talk a lot later no action.You can come my house everyday say hello.End of the day when my house on fire,you the first to run away.
Like when Mas Selamat run away,ppl blame WKS.He sit there quiet.In his mind is"My million dollar job leh!Cannot dun have!Go outside cant get better job!"

So you cant blame minister loh.Who tell u give them so much money?Who tell you vote them in?
Dun complain loh.Anything happen sure Citizen fault. Its your fault!!!
Your house kena loot by robber... Police ask you"Why robber loot your house but not other ppl house? Must be your fault!"
 
Back
Top