China threatened Australia a target for ‘nuclear war’
- Thread starter rocket
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 19,761
- Points
- 113
China has gone all out in its tantrum against Australia, with a top academic warning that we are now a target for “nuclear war” because of our submarine deal with the United States and Britain.
Victor Gao, who was once communist leader Deng Xiaoping’s translator, said the AUKUS pact announced last week was a “gross violation of international law” that will have “profound consequences” for “brainless” Aussies.
Following top secret negotiations with Britain and the US, Prime Minister Scott Morrison last week announced a deal for eight nuclear-powered submarines – aimed at dealing with “threats to regional stability”.
It comes as Chinese ships have been forcing their way into Japanese and Indonesian waters and making threats to invade Taiwan.
However, Mr Gao said that by signing up to the submarine deal, Australia has placed itself in the firing line.
Armed with nuclear submarines, Australia itself will be a target for possible nuclear attacks in the future,” the vice president for think tank the Centre for China and Globalisation told ABC’s China Tonight.
“You do not need to know whom it will be.
“The watershed moment will be if Australia will be armed with nuclear submarines to be locally produced in Australia.
“That will mean Australia will lose that privilege of not being targeted by nuclear weapons to other countries and that should be a wake-up call for all Australians.
Victor Gao, who was once communist leader Deng Xiaoping’s translator, said the AUKUS pact announced last week was a “gross violation of international law” that will have “profound consequences” for “brainless” Aussies.
Following top secret negotiations with Britain and the US, Prime Minister Scott Morrison last week announced a deal for eight nuclear-powered submarines – aimed at dealing with “threats to regional stability”.
It comes as Chinese ships have been forcing their way into Japanese and Indonesian waters and making threats to invade Taiwan.
However, Mr Gao said that by signing up to the submarine deal, Australia has placed itself in the firing line.
Armed with nuclear submarines, Australia itself will be a target for possible nuclear attacks in the future,” the vice president for think tank the Centre for China and Globalisation told ABC’s China Tonight.
“You do not need to know whom it will be.
“The watershed moment will be if Australia will be armed with nuclear submarines to be locally produced in Australia.
“That will mean Australia will lose that privilege of not being targeted by nuclear weapons to other countries and that should be a wake-up call for all Australians.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 19,761
- Points
- 113
He went on to warn that Taiwan is “part of China” and slammed the ABC host for referring to an “invasion”.
“Listen to me – the reunification of Taiwan will happen by peaceful means preferably, and by non-peaceful means if necessary,’ he said.
“No country will be able to deprive China’s mission of national reunification.
“If the Australian Government want to stand in the way of that, be my guest – you will see what will be the consequences to Australia.”
Mr Gao’s comments are a continuation of a series of furious statements made by Chinese officials and Chinese media after Australia revealed its AUKUS pact last week.
An article, published by the Communist Party’s mouthpiece, the Global Times, claims that the new deal leaves Australia exposed.
“Among all of the US allies, the decision Australia made to acquire submarine technology from the US is the clearest indication of Canberra’s support for Washington’s idea of an international system to contain China’s economic rise,” the editorial states.
“As an independent nation to become a pawn of the US, the stakes are just too high for Canberra. Australia could face the most dangerous consequence of being cannon fodder in the event of a military showdown in the region
“Listen to me – the reunification of Taiwan will happen by peaceful means preferably, and by non-peaceful means if necessary,’ he said.
“No country will be able to deprive China’s mission of national reunification.
“If the Australian Government want to stand in the way of that, be my guest – you will see what will be the consequences to Australia.”
Mr Gao’s comments are a continuation of a series of furious statements made by Chinese officials and Chinese media after Australia revealed its AUKUS pact last week.
An article, published by the Communist Party’s mouthpiece, the Global Times, claims that the new deal leaves Australia exposed.
“Among all of the US allies, the decision Australia made to acquire submarine technology from the US is the clearest indication of Canberra’s support for Washington’s idea of an international system to contain China’s economic rise,” the editorial states.
“As an independent nation to become a pawn of the US, the stakes are just too high for Canberra. Australia could face the most dangerous consequence of being cannon fodder in the event of a military showdown in the region
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 107,047
- Points
- 113
Just another commie doggie. Masquerading as some 'expert' of a think-tank group. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Gao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_China_and_Globalization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Gao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_China_and_Globalization
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 19,761
- Points
- 113
China’s application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) just hours after announcement of the new tripartite AUKUS (Australia, United Kingdom and United States) security partnership may – or may not – have been coincidental. Regardless, both events illustrate the rapidly shifting geostrategic environment in the Indo-Pacific region.
AUKUS is a momentous agreement – for all three parties.
The “forever” partnership is especially consequential for Australia. For proponents, AUKUS is a prudent, practical and far-sighted response to the existential threat Australia perceives in the evolving and increasingly tense strategic environment emerging in the Indo-Pacific region. Like many, Australia is worried by the more bellicose approach being taken by Xi Jinping’s China. In responding to this challenge, the US remains for Canberra its indispensable partner.
AUKUS is a momentous agreement – for all three parties.
The “forever” partnership is especially consequential for Australia. For proponents, AUKUS is a prudent, practical and far-sighted response to the existential threat Australia perceives in the evolving and increasingly tense strategic environment emerging in the Indo-Pacific region. Like many, Australia is worried by the more bellicose approach being taken by Xi Jinping’s China. In responding to this challenge, the US remains for Canberra its indispensable partner.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 19,761
- Points
- 113
TAIPEI: Taiwan has formally applied to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), the official Central News Agency said on Wednesday (Sep 22), less than a week after China said it too had submitted an application.
Economy Minister Wang Mei-hua will give details on Thursday, the agency quoted Deputy Economy Minister Chen Chern-chyi as saying.
Economy Minister Wang Mei-hua will give details on Thursday, the agency quoted Deputy Economy Minister Chen Chern-chyi as saying.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
- Messages
- 6,840
- Points
- 113
Great.
Although I am not a fan of communism (a Jewish invention btw), I must applaud Tiongs coz they look more than CECA or any middle eastern, latin american, african or other asian country to be likely to challenge yankees and ang moh kias.
aussies and other anglos need some reality check from time to time.
a kick up their backside if you like
let's face it
losers like turkic donkeys who happen to be either tyrannical authoritarian vassal states of russkies, or a mere poodle of yankees as we see in anatolia, won't ever be able to come close to the tiongs - commies or not.
sounds weird since it seems like i'm praising slanty chinks.
maybe it's just the yankee poodle slanties like stinkypura gooks taiwanse japs hongkies etc who have formed a wrong impression of slanties as yankee ball lickers, ang moh porlumpars, brainwashed morons.
that said communism (a jewish invention) is not to my liking at all. the good thing abt tiongkok is it does not export commie revolution any more, at least for now.
where ALL slanties lack, is in the genetic department.
they lack inventiveness, creativity, originality. brains, talent. ingenuity.
the most they can do is tweak a few settings after ang moh kias or some other races have brought about an invention to the fore
apart from tweaks and minor improvements here and there, slanties are notable for their absence in making radical new breakthroughs.
this is as true of japs as of gooks as of taiwanese as of stinkies as of tiongs as of other slanties.
genes seem to be the only barrier.
Although I am not a fan of communism (a Jewish invention btw), I must applaud Tiongs coz they look more than CECA or any middle eastern, latin american, african or other asian country to be likely to challenge yankees and ang moh kias.
aussies and other anglos need some reality check from time to time.
a kick up their backside if you like
let's face it
losers like turkic donkeys who happen to be either tyrannical authoritarian vassal states of russkies, or a mere poodle of yankees as we see in anatolia, won't ever be able to come close to the tiongs - commies or not.
sounds weird since it seems like i'm praising slanty chinks.
maybe it's just the yankee poodle slanties like stinkypura gooks taiwanse japs hongkies etc who have formed a wrong impression of slanties as yankee ball lickers, ang moh porlumpars, brainwashed morons.
that said communism (a jewish invention) is not to my liking at all. the good thing abt tiongkok is it does not export commie revolution any more, at least for now.
where ALL slanties lack, is in the genetic department.
they lack inventiveness, creativity, originality. brains, talent. ingenuity.
the most they can do is tweak a few settings after ang moh kias or some other races have brought about an invention to the fore
apart from tweaks and minor improvements here and there, slanties are notable for their absence in making radical new breakthroughs.
this is as true of japs as of gooks as of taiwanese as of stinkies as of tiongs as of other slanties.
genes seem to be the only barrier.
Philippines welcome Australia submarines and Indonesia Pak Joko invited Australia to join ASEAN as full member.
All the countries surrounding Australia are very happy with Australia submarines and there is nothing wrong!! Why China is unhappy? hahahaha
All the countries surrounding Australia are very happy with Australia submarines and there is nothing wrong!! Why China is unhappy? hahahaha
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 60,834
- Points
- 113
because tiongs haven't grown up yet. still behave like spoilt brats throwing temper tantrums.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,868
- Points
- 113
beats me why people support china or india,
to spore they have been nothing but trouble since the 90s
to spore they have been nothing but trouble since the 90s
I doubt those countries like Japan and Australia will allow China's admission into this CPTPP. Already, Japan has announced that they are doubtful if China can fully comply and commit to the terms and conditions as stipulated in the CPTPP's membership. It will be a direct slap in the face to China if Taiwan were to get in instead of China.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,868
- Points
- 113
its not the people methinks, every society has good or bad people, its the fucking govt, all govts in the world is fucked up
this idiot does not represent the citizens, the citizens probably only want peaceful lives
- Joined
- May 5, 2021
- Messages
- 808
- Points
- 43
Think about this. The US trade deficit with China is still very high, at over 300B dollars.
What Australia cannot or will not sell to China, US is most willing to sell to China.
What is Australia to the US if it's not for the sake of US interests?
Joe Biden can't even remember the Australian PM's name.
What Australia cannot or will not sell to China, US is most willing to sell to China.
What is Australia to the US if it's not for the sake of US interests?
Joe Biden can't even remember the Australian PM's name.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2008
- Messages
- 26,897
- Points
- 113
Aussies still think they are the default white raja in Asia Pacific?
there was no such issues before china built islands near malaysia, singapore, thailand, vietnam, philippines and indonesia.
did australia build any islands near to singapore ?
Similar threads
