CASE closing the stable door after the horse has bolted

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
14,837
Points
113
Shouldn't CASE have addressed this BEFORE issuing a CASE Trust stamp to travel agencies?

Published on Feb 10, 2014

Consumer protection: Case replies

WE UNDERSTAND the frustration of consumers affected by the sudden closure of Five Stars Tours ("Tour agency's sudden closure shakes consumer confidence" by Mr Francis Cheng; Jan 23 and "Don't forget aim of protecting consumers" by Mr Tan Chin Aik; Jan 29, both published online).

The case shows the lack of protection for consumers in the travel industry, especially those who have already paid partially or in full for their tour packages at travel fairs.

These tours are often conducted many months later and consumers could be adversely affected if the travel agency suddenly closes down.


We have decided to work on an insurance protection scheme for travel agencies. This will protect the payments made by consumers in advance for travel packages.


We will start with CaseTrust-accredited travel agencies and we hope to extend it to the whole travel industry if there is enough support from industry associations and the Government.


While we work on the insurance scheme, we also urge consumers to buy travel insurance to minimise their risks.


Also, while the CaseTrust accreditation scheme represents the retailers' commitment to fair and ethical business practices, it cannot ensure the financial stability of the company.


We hope that consumers will not lose confidence in the CaseTrust accreditation.


We are sorry to hear of Mr Tan's unpleasant experience with Five Stars in 2012.


We will see how we can use this feedback to improve how CaseTrust-accredited companies handle complaints and disputes.


Lim Biow Chuan

President
Consumers Association of Singapore

Copyright © 2014 Singapore Press Holdings. All rights reserved.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top