CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, public

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
SINGAPORE - Unlike someone leading a public agency, the chief executive of a private company cannot dodge responsibility and "kick the ball away".

That, to CapitaLand head honcho Liew Mun Leong (picture), is one fundamental difference between heading an entity in the private sector compared to one in the public sector.

In other words, a firm's chief executive officer has to find some way to "score" - solve whatever problem his company is facing - because stakeholders and shareholders will only look to him for an answer, he said.

Mr Liew, who spent 22 years in public service - rising to become the head of a statutory board - before plunging into the private sector 20 years ago, was speaking at the Charles Rudd Distinguished Lecture last night as part of National Engineers Day organised by the Institution of Engineers Singapore.

His one-and-a-half hour talk touched on the highlights and lessons learnt from being a civil engineer in the Defence Ministry, building Changi Airport and heading the statutory board Singapore Institute of Standards and Industrial Research - now part of SPRING Singapore - before going on to head one of Asia's biggest real estate companies, CapitaLand, 16 years ago.

Citing his experience in his first private sector job as chief of L&M Group, Mr Liew, 66, said shareholders wanted to pull out their bonds just two weeks after he joined the company because of the financial difficulties the firm was in then.

He had to, and managed to, convince them not to do so.

Leaders in the public sector, however, never have to be in the firing line, said Mr Liew, because ministers, not permanent secretaries or heads of statutory boards, will handle everyone from the public and the press to the regulators.

Another difference, he added, was in leadership style. Instead of using authority or hierarchy, leaders in the private sector had to use persuasion and motivation to earn respect.

Mr Liew pointed out that his years in the public sector helped him succeed in the private sector. For example, it taught him to be highly disciplined and to deliver under pressure - like helping to build Changi Airport in five years as a fresh-faced engineer.

Civil servants are also "brainwashed in integrity", he quipped, which the corporate world values highly.

As a chief executive whose tenure far exceeds the norm - American firms' chief executives typically stay on the job for about five to six years - Mr Liew said the secret to building a successful, long-lasting company is to invest in people.

Referring to how CapitaLand weathered the "perfect storm" soon after its inception in 2000 - the bursting of the tech bubble; Sept 11 attacks; Iraq war; the two Bali bombings; and Sars - Mr Liew said his mantra was: "If I have the right people with me, I'm not worried about any crisis."

Mr Liew, who announced that he will step down in June next year, said he does not believe in retirement.

Instead, he will go into a "not-in-employment" phase and continue helping the Changi Airport Group, which he chairs, as well as helping other companies in an advisory role.

He is also in talks for lecturing gigs with several universities and plans to write a book on his career.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

.

Quote :


His one-and-a-half hour talk touched on the highlights and lessons learnt from being a civil engineer in the Defence Ministry, building Changi Airport and heading the statutory board Singapore Institute of Standards and Industrial Research - now part of SPRING Singapore - before going on to head one of Asia's biggest real estate companies, CapitaLand, 16 years ago.


Bros , how come he did not mention

Mdm Ho Ching was working at SISIR

during his time ? :(
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Referring to how CapitaLand weathered the "perfect storm" soon after its inception in 2000 - the bursting of the tech bubble; Sept 11 attacks; Iraq war; the two Bali bombings; and Sars - Mr Liew said his mantra was: "If I have the right people with me, I'm not worried about any crisis."
Should be he got the right backers behind him............never worry gonna get the sack!
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Should be he got the right backers behind him............never worry gonna get the sack!


Sir , also he never mentioned he was CEO or something

at a troubled civil & construction public listed company ( cannot remember name of it ) ...
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Sir , also he never mentioned he was CEO or something

at a troubled civil & construction public listed company ( cannot remember name of it ) ...


Mdm its the L&M Group .
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Singapore L&M Served Winding Up Petition

SINGAPORE (Dow Jones)--Singapore-based construction company L&M Group Investments Ltd. (L13.SG) Thursday said it has been served a winding up petition and is seeking legal advice.

"The Company announces that Mr. Yeo Boon Siah has on 8 November 2005 served a winding-up petition against the Company. The hearing of the petition is scheduled in the High Court on 2 December 2005. The Company is seeking legal advice on the matter," the company said in a short statement.

&M Group Investments didn't provide any other details on the petition or about the person serving it.

The company's shares fell to S$0.005 Thursday, from S$0.01, before being suspended at noon (0400 GMT).

The group reported a net loss of S$26.5 million for the year ended Sept. 30 2004.

In addition to the loss, L&M's balance sheet showed net current liabilities of S$35.9 million and a deficit in shareholder funds amounting to S$18.1 million.

Citing these figures, the company's auditor - Moore Stephens - said L&M's ability to continue as a going concern hinges on its restructuring, successful completion of its ongoing projects and its ability to obtain new profitable ones.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Mdm its the L&M Group .

I like his claim that he built or helped build Changi Airport....may be even singlehandedly (sic ). Those in the know know otherwise.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Mdm its the L&M Group .


Dear TuaBui . Tks.

The Moral of The Story is that Liew
uses the wrong Analogy ( Football) .
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

I like his claim that he built or helped build Changi Airport....may be even singlehandedly (sic ). Those in the know know otherwise.

Maybe he invented the internet too.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Dear TuaBui . Tks.

The Moral of The Story is that Liew
uses the wrong Analogy ( Football) .


Mdm , maybe "Food Chain" a better Analogy ?



Food Chain : A succession of organisms in an ecological community that constitutes a continuation of food energy from one organism to another as each consumes a lower member and in turn is preyed upon by a higher member.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Liew Mun Leong is a glorified highly overpaid goverment servant and he is now claiming to be in the private sector?? These people have no shame. He is just the front man for LKY and Ho Jinx. During the 1998 fiancial crisis he was asked to buy up OBS assets in Bali, Spore and UK above market price to save his arse at LKY request. Liew was never a big fan of investing in China. he went to China cos old man told him to. He had no choice. Now he thinks he is some god sent big time hero entreprenuer making speeches to real entreprenuers. These people must all be laughing inside. Excepet that he had the last as he gets S$20m a year. He is in the same category as people like Jennie Chua. Except that Jenneie Chua know it, does not pretend to hde it and makes people laugh with her self depecating humour. Ther are many like this Liew characer who think they are some big time businessmen when they are nothing more than civil servants with a hugh pay packet thanks to LKY.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

LOL, 'private' company. Who owns most of the shares of Capitaland?

Ditto for SMRT, SembCorp, Singtel, NOL... all 'private' companies in name only.
So what if you're publicly listed on the stock exchange? Who owns you?
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Liew Mun Leong is a glorified highly overpaid goverment servant and he is now claiming to be in the private sector?? These people have no shame. He is just the front man for LKY and Ho Jinx. During the 1998 fiancial crisis he was asked to buy up OBS assets in Bali, Spore and UK above market price to save his arse at LKY request. Liew was never a big fan of investing in China. he went to China cos old man told him to. He had no choice. Now he thinks he is some god sent big time hero entreprenuer making speeches to real entreprenuers. These people must all be laughing inside. Excepet that he had the last as he gets S$20m a year. He is in the same category as people like Jennie Chua. Except that Jenneie Chua know it, does not pretend to hde it and makes people laugh with her self depecating humour. Ther are many like this Liew characer who think they are some big time businessmen when they are nothing more than civil servants with a hugh pay packet thanks to LKY.
pay me 20 million a year i can be even more shameless than him......
Dun waste time scolding these lapdogs.......vote out their masters and we can kill these leeches.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Even after voted out, GIC and Temasek is considered "private".

pay me 20 million a year i can be even more shameless than him......
Dun waste time scolding these lapdogs.......vote out their masters and we can kill these leeches.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

His mentor is PY, the same who match made the PM to his current boss. He is a failed businessman in the private sector and quickly returned to the govt company.
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

SINGAPORE - Unlike someone leading a public agency, the chief executive of a private company cannot dodge responsibility and "kick the ball away".

That, to CapitaLand head honcho Liew Mun Leong (picture), is one fundamental difference between heading an entity in the private sector compared to one in the public sector.

In other words, a firm's chief executive officer has to find some way to "score" - solve whatever problem his company is facing - because stakeholders and shareholders will only look to him for an answer, he said ...
fail oso never mind 1 la ...

wil juz go 2 another glc n b chairman la ... rook @ dat 'honest-mistake' fella ... went 2 nol, cmi, now oso chairman @ glc ...
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

that is so true.

fail oso never mind 1 la ...

wil juz go 2 another glc n b chairman la ... rook @ dat 'honest-mistake' fella ... went 2 nol, cmi, now oso chairman @ glc ...
 
Re: CapitaLand chief uses football analogy to show differences in heading private, pu

Since he chose to use a soccer analogy, I wud say his appt with SISIR and Capitaland was kelong lah. He was Ho Ching's blue eye boy.
 
Back
Top