• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious BT , 18 Dec 2025 : Louis Vuitton Sues ValueMax Retail Pte Ltd , a Unit of SGX-Listed ValueMax Group Over Alleged Trademark Infringement .

shiokalingam

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
4,343
Points
113
.

ValuaMax Retail 18 Dec 2025.png
 
Last edited:
1766026890149.png



.
https://www.singaporelawwatch.sg/He...-valuemax-over-alleged-trademark-infringement

.

1766026949430.png

.

ValueMax Retail has denied infringing LV’s trademarks or passing off, pointing out that the items under dispute have symbols that are neither identical nor similar to any of the LV marks.


Global luxury and fashion goods company Louis Vuitton has sued a wholly owned subsidiary of mainboard-listed ValueMax Group : T6I 0% in the Singapore High Court for trademark infringement and passing off.

Louis Vuitton, known popularly as LV, is taking issue with two pieces of jewellery sold or offered for sale by ValueMax Retail, which LV claimed to be in direct competition with its jewellery business.

In its statement of claim filed in mid-September, LV alleged that ValueMax Retail had in July and August 2024 at its Yishun Street 22 store offered for sale these pieces of jewellery that were affixed with signs identical or similar to one or more of LV’s marks.

The suit had a case conference on Tuesday (Dec 16).

LV has four trademarks registered in Singapore: the “LV” monogram and three graphical motifs.

It claimed that the store sold a gold charm and offered for sale at least one other piece of jewellery – a pair of gold earrings – on Aug 5, 2025.

These are counterfeits that infringed its trademarks, LV alleged.

LV said its brand is one of the world’s most valuable and is also one of the most counterfeited luxury brands in the world.

There is therefore a need to deter similar infringement, as its reputation and goodwill will be damaged by counterfeit goods.

LV further alleged that ValueMax Retail had made misrepresentations to the public that the jewellery in question were LV goods or that there was an economic association or relationship between the jewellery and LV.

This would not only create confusion for the consumer, but also damage LV’s interest and dilute the distinctive character of its trademarks.

It claimed that it has suffered or is likely to suffer loss and damage.

The French behemoth said it is entitled to statutory damages under the Trademarks Act, which are up to S$100,000 for each type of goods or service in relation to which the trademark has been infringed, and up to S$1 million in total unless the claimant proves that its actual loss from such infringement exceeds S$1 million.

It is seeking an inquiry into the damages, an account of profits made by ValueMax Retail from the sale of the alleged counterfeits, or statutory damages.

It is also applying for an injunction to restrain ValueMax Retail from infringing the LV trademarks, passing off or attempting to pass off the defendant’s goods as LV’s and misrepresenting as having an economic association or relationship with the French company.

It is seeking an order for the delivery and forfeiture of all goods, materials or articles with ValueMax Retail in relation to the alleged counterfeits.

The other order it is seeking is for the full disclosure by ValueMax Retail of all of its trademark infringements and passing off.

The information sought includes the particulars of suppliers or those offered to supply the allegedly infringing goods, the particulars of buyers, distributors or exporters dealing with ValueMax Retail in the alleged counterfeits, and details of dealings in alleged infringing goods.


ValueMax Retail rebuts all allegations

ValueMax Retail denied infringing LV’s trademarks or passing off, pointing out that the items under dispute had symbols that were neither identical nor similar to any of the LV marks.

In its defence, it said it is a dealer in second-hand jewellery made of gold and precious stones, as well as branded watches and branded bags, buying these from various parties, including other second-hand dealers, pawnshops and consumers.

The store accused of selling counterfeits is a pawnshop with sales counters, it said.

It claimed that it made no representations as to the origin of the alleged counterfeits, nor any alleged economic association or relationship between the jewellery and LV.

ValueMax Retail rejected the claim that it is in direct competition with LV, as the nature of its business is different from that of the French group.
 
me think LV got a good case for VMR to answer :redface:

can see one of LV past cases here ,


 
Last edited:
Malu max. Reputation gone if pawnshop also kena bluff by counterfeit goods.

With the new high end fake watches out of China a lot already flow into local pawnshops. This might blow up next.
 
so called branded handbags, watches, etc... also all MADE IN CHINA lol.... when they sell you at the luxury store, need to perform magic trick like wear glove, handle very carefully, etc... just to give the customer an impression that this is precious but in fact nothing more than just garbage being valued by brainwashed morons mostly women who are willing to spread open their legs just to get it. That's marketing...
 
These 'franchise' pawnshops started business around the time the first casino became operational in 2010, and are responsible for driving many vintage independent pawnshops out of business. :cool:

A proper pawnshop should be like this: no pretentious marketing, no uniformed personnel, no window display, no bright lights. Go inside, do your business, and leave.

AG0ilSxLGqsaV3fsXRPn9xi--MHRvxXTJWj4rLPoNglW-sjbRGDZRq1gW4O3BpAhfYjqWWLrotvAr1wYadGYPNJQBKdQj9y0Cqzhehf4tOHSgGXyjZPFRsISJteZ4fKheXd3DSVOb3E=s0


Compare to these jewellery shop wannabes:

AF1QipPgUQAha0H7LYLt5h3dtjzk20uXCffmQKe-UcIp=s0
AF1QipOo9g-8BE5KIgtqfCYiARLpPtD8-s0bJuTPRuSb=s0
 
so called branded handbags, watches, etc... also all MADE IN CHINA lol.... when they sell you at the luxury store, need to perform magic trick like wear glove, handle very carefully, etc... just to give the customer an impression that this is precious but in fact nothing more than just garbage being valued by brainwashed morons mostly women who are willing to spread open their legs just to get it. That's marketing...

Please stop believing that Tiong propaganda, a shameless and desperate attempt to persuade you to spend more money on Chinese products, even the branded ones, from their 'source factories' (read: 'counterfeit sweatshops').
 
so called branded handbags, watches, etc... also all MADE IN CHINA lol.... when they sell you at the luxury store, need to perform magic trick like wear glove, handle very carefully, etc... just to give the customer an impression that this is precious but in fact nothing more than just garbage being valued by brainwashed morons mostly women who are willing to spread open their legs just to get it. That's marketing...
But the zham is real, not counterfeit.
 
These 'franchise' pawnshops started business around the time the first casino became operational in 2010, and are responsible for driving many vintage independent pawnshops out of business. :cool:

A proper pawnshop should be like this: no pretentious marketing, no uniformed personnel, no window display, no bright lights. Go inside, do your business, and leave.

AG0ilSxLGqsaV3fsXRPn9xi--MHRvxXTJWj4rLPoNglW-sjbRGDZRq1gW4O3BpAhfYjqWWLrotvAr1wYadGYPNJQBKdQj9y0Cqzhehf4tOHSgGXyjZPFRsISJteZ4fKheXd3DSVOb3E=s0


Compare to these jewellery shop wannabes:

AF1QipPgUQAha0H7LYLt5h3dtjzk20uXCffmQKe-UcIp=s0
AF1QipOo9g-8BE5KIgtqfCYiARLpPtD8-s0bJuTPRuSb=s0
To be fair those new wave pawnshop chains did revamp the industry.
Giving lower interests and higher valuation for one. The older pawnshops had it good for too long.
The only bad outcome is that they did away with the pawnshops public auction.
 
.
does the “lv” monogram of valuemax mean “lau virgin?”

Even cheapo common brands now also have fakes. There’s no escaping. Just check out the fake online stores in TikTok

so called branded handbags, watches, etc... also all MADE IN CHINA lol.... when they sell you at the luxury store, need to perform magic trick like wear glove, handle very carefully, etc... just to give the customer an impression that this is precious but in fact nothing more than just garbage being valued by brainwashed morons mostly women who are willing to spread open their legs just to get it. That's marketing...


Can buyers of return to Valuemax Pawnshop at Yishun and ask for full refunds ? :cry:
 
To be fair those new wave pawnshop chains did revamp the industry.
Giving lower interests and higher valuation for one. The older pawnshops had it good for too long.
The only bad outcome is that they did away with the pawnshops public auction.


Heard some PShops makan the pawn items since gold prices have shot up sky high without proper informing pawners to renew tickets.
 
Malu max. Reputation gone if pawnshop also kena bluff by counterfeit goods.

With the new high end fake watches out of China a lot already flow into local pawnshops. This might blow up next.

means its Share price also indirectly inflated by all these counterfeits stocks . Jialat liao.
 
Even cheapo common brands now also have fakes. There’s no escaping. Just check out the fake online stores in TikTok

.



Bn Jack Ma famously said , China's counterfeits are better than the originals.
once their brand is established, they need not make profits from selling the brands

Just sue and sue and collect the compensation will becum more profitable.
 
Back
Top