-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
BRITISH NEWS SAYS TOTAL OF 8 MIGHT DIE FROM SIA TURBULENT
- Thread starter Timerty
- Start date
the turbulence hit and the vaccines that those blur fucks took....double whammy.
That is serious
My chinese gf said it cannot be turbulence. She bonked many pilots and know all kinds of planes inside out.
My helper told me her minah friend whom piak many sia muud technicians said that cannot be engine problem.
Notice the silence by CAAS?
Looks like a coverup is in the works.
Looks like a coverup is in the works.
Of course not.
Then is it pilot problem?
Dear all, I have privy knowledge that Boeing's manufacturing contractors might cut costs at their sites and use inferior parts like nuts and screws. Although these items are non essential they add to the sum of total.
2nd, the pilots for SQ321 must face inquiry as to why there was no early response to turbulence ahead. This is unacceptable as passengers' lives esp AMDK not sinkies depend on you.
Are these pilots adequately trained or they are those fly by night lousy stock?
2nd, the pilots for SQ321 must face inquiry as to why there was no early response to turbulence ahead. This is unacceptable as passengers' lives esp AMDK not sinkies depend on you.
Are these pilots adequately trained or they are those fly by night lousy stock?
Maybe the reason why SIA made so much money (compared to other airlines) recently was due to a directive to fly the planes at a low altitude, regardless of weather condition. Saves fuel money. 
https://www.quora.com/How-does-an-airplane-preserve-fuel-by-going-to-a-lower-altitude
Airplanes can preserve fuel by flying at lower altitudes under certain conditions, although this may not always be the case. The primary reason for potential fuel savings at lower altitudes is related to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance and the way engines operate at different altitudes.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-an-airplane-preserve-fuel-by-going-to-a-lower-altitude
Airplanes can preserve fuel by flying at lower altitudes under certain conditions, although this may not always be the case. The primary reason for potential fuel savings at lower altitudes is related to the aircraft's aerodynamic performance and the way engines operate at different altitudes.
- Reduced Drag: At lower altitudes, the air density is higher compared to higher altitudes. This higher air density can result in reduced drag on the aircraft, as the wings generate more lift for the same airspeed. This can allow the aircraft to fly more efficiently, requiring less power to maintain the same speed.
- Engine Efficiency: Jet engines are typically more efficient at lower altitudes. This is because the denser air at lower altitudes provides better combustion conditions for the engines, leading to improved fuel efficiency. Engines may be able to produce more thrust for a given amount of fuel at lower altitudes.
- Shorter Flight Distance: In some cases, flying at a lower altitude may result in a shorter flight distance due to more direct routing or avoiding detours caused by weather or air traffic. This can lead to fuel savings by reducing the overall flight time.
Similar threads
