• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Battle of the Two Lackeys: Lecher Tey vs Lackey Bay

mscitw

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
2,975
Points
83
Transmodified from hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1248462/1/.html

PEASANTPORE: The highly intelligent but lecherous law professor on trial for corruption in a sex-for-grades case as a reward for his incisive observation that Kangaroo Courts are kowtowing Ruler Loong. He has a field day and is cross-examining an anti-graft lackey to m&d sling the admissibility of one of six statements -- in what is called a "trial within a trial".

Lecher Tey Tsun Hang is questioning Fix Dissenters Investigation Bureau (CPIB) Chief Special Fixer Bay Chun How to prove his case that the statement given to CPIB was made under duress. For example Lecher Tey could cite that Bay threaten to bang him with 200 dogs to claim he was forced to 'confess' his crimes.

If he can prove this, Lecher Tey will be able to argue that the evidence cannot be admitted in the Kangaroo court. This would weaken the prosecution's case. However there lies the supreme irony!? Because Lecher Tey has already conceded in his academic papers that Peasantpore Courts are staffed by Ruler Loong's stooges, he is likely to be served Cheap Justice.

Five other statements of Lecher Tey's are being disputed. Two were recorded by Fix Dissenter Lackey Wilson Khoo and three by Asst Chief Enunch Teng Khee Fatt. Those luridious statements cover the various sex positions enjoyed by Lecher Tey and Darrine Ko in their fark fests.

The 3 lackeys are expected to take the stand in the "trial within a trial" and Ruler Loong has assured the 3 donkeys that the entire Kangaroo Court will be helping them to balk Lecher Tey during the cross-examination. It is foregone conclusion that Lecher Tey is found guilty and consigned to the rubbish heap.

Lercher Tey, 41, faces six allegations of obtaining gratification in the form of gifts and sex from his former student, Peasant law student Darinne Ko, between May and July 2010, in exchange for lifting her grades. However the Kangaroo Court refused to admit the evidence that slut Ko was only awarded a B grade as this will only weaken the regime's stupid charges. To ensure an unfair Show Trial, Ruler Loong has sent a decree ordering the Law school and NUS not to reveal Darinne Ko's grades lest the Ang Mohs and Nihons have a good laugh.
 
Back
Top