- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,177
- Points
- 48
He talking what bird language?
"It is open knowledge that Aim is owned by PAP. I was referring to other companies owned by PAP and clarifying that just becos the company directors are PAP members, it does not necc mean that they are PAP-owned companies. As to the no. of companies owned by PAP, I am afraid I do not have the info. I do not know of any others."
First, he say he was referring to other companies owned by PAP then later say he do not know of any. If he do not know any, then how to refer?
So now that TC are political organisation, then why is it under MND? Is MND also a political organisation?
"It is open knowledge that Aim is owned by PAP. I was referring to other companies owned by PAP and clarifying that just becos the company directors are PAP members, it does not necc mean that they are PAP-owned companies. As to the no. of companies owned by PAP, I am afraid I do not have the info. I do not know of any others."
First, he say he was referring to other companies owned by PAP then later say he do not know of any. If he do not know any, then how to refer?
So now that TC are political organisation, then why is it under MND? Is MND also a political organisation?
![]()
Tampines GRC MP Baey Yam Keng, at his Facebook chat on Sunday night
“I know there are naturally concerns if there is a conflict of interest or whether residents’ money (Service & Conservancy Charges) have been misused. However, we should also look at the industry practice of managing IT systems, whether Aim has failed in its commitment to the TCs, and if the fees it has been collecting have been unreasonable...
People might be reading too much into things and are drawn into some political motivations. However, we cannot forget that TCs are all political organisations...
PCF (PAP Community Foundation) is the community arm of PAP, and it runs kindergartens and childcare centres. I don’t think just because the directors are former MPs, the company is owned by PAP. There are MPs, both PAP and opposition parties, who have their own companies, it doesn’t mean these companies belong to the parties.
It is open knowledge that Aim is owned by PAP. I was referring to other companies owned by PAP and clarifying that just becos the company directors are PAP members, it does not necc mean that they are PAP-owned companies. As to the no. of companies owned by PAP, I am afraid I do not have the info. I do not know of any others.
I am sure more light will come out of the Aim fiasco. But I know there are many $2 companies around, it does not mean they are all fly-by-night companies.”

nah Baey!