117) Observer(SG-HK) on October 11th, 2008 10.20 am Dear gemami, just for your information, I responded to your #48 post which contain no racist remarks or personal attacks, but somehow it was censored. Strange but again in today’s trying times, I think people just didn’t want respect freedom of expression, even a so-call indpendent coummunity blog space. How pathethic.118) Pondefecator on October 11th, 2008 12.23 pm You too? Other than the one time when you were overly sarcastic toward my post,
I have always the impression that you are a wise and credible man whose comments I had never dismissed out of hand. Well it’s their turf and their prerogative.
119) Observer(SG-HK) on October 11th, 2008 1.20 pm Podefactor, yes indeed. I am challenging them to openly response why the moderation and guess what, that message also got put under moderation. I guess this one too. Don’t go telling everyone how bad and bias the MSM and the Governing policy where I now find them just a waste of my precious time. So much for standing up for freedom of speech. Just appauling.
C & P from TOC, 'Means testing for public housing?' today.
