Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fetish

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=1]CHINA SPORTS BRAND LI NING SUFFERS GREAT LOSS DESPITE BEING BACKED BY SINGAPORE GIC[/h]
Post date:
3 Sep 2014 - 2:42pm








(Reuters) - In 2010, former Chinese gymnast Li Ning led a surging $4 billion sportswear business, a gold-medal pinnacle echoing his victories at the 1984 Olympic Games.

Now, the Li Ning (2331.HK) business is more reminiscent of the ex-sportsman's exit from the 1988 Olympics without a podium finish. As customers have turned to aspirational global brands like Nike Inc (NKE.N) or cheaper local firms, Li Ning has racked up heavy losses, losing four-fifths of its market value.

The company has long pinned a turnaround plan on targeting trendy, fast-growing areas of sport in China, like basketball, hoping to attract younger consumers with a mid-range pricing strategy. But company watchers fear what Li Ning sees as the middle ground could turn out to be a no-man's land, while still-loyal older customers may be turned off by the focus on youth goods.

"They tried to go younger, but in the course of doing that they lost a lot of those aged over 30 who were traditionally a more loyal customer base," said James Roy, senior analyst at China Market Research Group in Shanghai.
Equally, many younger customers have yet to buy into the strategy.

"It seems like (Li Ning) products are targeted mostly at students aged 13 or 14," Ding Jianan, a 22-year-old student, told Reuters in China's commercial capital Shanghai. "I can afford higher-priced items from Western brands, which offer better quality. In college, people like to compare each other's outfits so the peer pressure will push us to buy Nike or Adidas (ADSGn.DE)."

Li Ning, backed by private equity powerhouse TPG Capital and Singapore wealth fund GIC, last month reported a first-half net loss of nearly $100 million, more than three times that of the corresponding period a year earlier.






It said at the time its recovery could take up to two more years as it invests hundreds of millions of dollars in promotion and advertising. The company declined to comment for this article.

"It's hard to say if their direction (of transformation) is right or not when the loss is getting bigger and bigger," said Steve Chow, analyst at Sunwah Kingsway Group Research.

Read the rest of the article here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/01/us-lining-outlook-idUSKBN0GW33...
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

No Problem, if its get really bad just shift the GOAL POST.

Not mistaken, they also got kicked by the Reebok brand years ago.
 
GIC must be ran by idiots. Sportswear are lifestyle items. When you create a totally new brand with 0 brand value, how do you expect the products to be selling at similiar prices to Adidas, Nike, Reebok, Under Amour? They did nothing on the marketing front, and expect it to sell by itself, just by leveraging on star power???

Bunch of dipsticks
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

No Problem, if its get really bad just shift the GOAL POST.

Not mistaken, they also got kicked by the Reebok brand years ago.

No problem, the husband tells you, at 55 do not ask for your $$$, never ask for your $$$ wait beyond 90 like his dad...& still don't ask for your money...& THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS, so that, his 'wife', can buy more companies like these...

btw..the GIC man is very stingily, take train drop off Raffles Place walk...when overseas sleep in budget hotel etc...most likely another of those wash his undies, wear pagoda brand white singlet...still using the wife 40 years ago made, drawer strings underwear..etc..

No problem....your money is well taken care of...!!:rolleyes:
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

GIC must be ran by idiots. Sportswear are lifestyle items. When you create a totally new brand with 0 brand value, how do you expect the products to be selling at similiar prices to Adidas, Nike, Reebok, Under Amour? They did nothing on the marketing front, and expect it to sell by itself, just by leveraging on star power???

Bunch of dipsticks

Don't worry, GIC President 'SUPERMAN cum YODA' Lim Siong Guan will save the day for GIC!
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

i think they should the name to Kuan Yew instead.theres no brand power behind Li Ning.i mean who the fuck is Li Ning?
 
Don't worry, GIC President 'SUPERMAN cum YODA' Lim Siong Guan will save the day for GIC!

The 4 days world tour is a joke. The flight time alone will be around 2.5 days. He cover 4 to 5 countries in various continents in 1.5 days. That means, he only spend 3 hours or so, less travelling time, in each market. What can you do in 3 hours? Might as well get them to fly to singapore or do through video conferencing. What was he trying to proof??? Fucking dipstick
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

The 4 days world tour is a joke. The flight time alone will be around 2.5 days. He cover 4 to 5 countries in various continents in 1.5 days. That means, he only spend 3 hours or so, less travelling time, in each market. What can you do in 3 hours? Might as well get them to fly to singapore or do through video conferencing. What was he trying to proof??? Fucking dipstick

Only the daft 60% buy this kind of stories....maybe he was on a 'collection' trip?? 'collecting info'.... ha ha ha :rolleyes:
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

sack the defense ministar for not buying li ning shoes and sapporking the failing national company. better, hang him with escher piano strings.
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

sack the defense ministar for not buying li ning shoes and sapporking the failing national company. better, hang him with escher piano strings.

Achtung!....Adidas!!.....
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

When you invest other people's money and losses are easily explained as long term investments, this is what you get.

You want accountability, get a new broom (to) sweep clean.

Not difficult to guess why your CPF pays low interest rates and cannot be withdrawn at 55.

If the miserly amount is supposed to honour the pioneers, then Li Ning must be worshipped with the huge investments.
 
Re: Another GIC Mis-Step: No $ for SGs, But OK to Lose Hundreds of Millions on PRC Fe

This is the way the PAP bribes the Chinese.
 
Back
Top