Angry China in retaliation BAN & BOOTING OUT AMERICAN media in NEWS FREEDOM WAR! EYE FOR EYEA

[obama.bin.laden]

http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2020-03/18/c_1125727197.htm

新华国际时评：美打压中国媒体是自取其辱
2020-03-18 00:59:38 来源： 新华网
新华社北京3月18日电 题：美打压中国媒体是自取其辱
新华社记者
美国国务院日前以所谓“对等原则”为借口，限制五家中国驻美媒体的中国籍员工数量，变相驱逐中国媒体记者。此举创下了世界新闻史上罕见的一国政府大规模变相驱逐别国记者的“纪录”，给长期自我标榜为新闻自由“楷模”及“捍卫者”的美国留下一个难以洗刷的污点。
美国政府相关决策者并非完全意识不到这一点。因此，在回应媒体的质疑时，他们一边宣称“这只是限制人数，不是驱逐”，一边倒打一耙，反复攻击“中国限制驻华外国记者的新闻自由”，为自己对中国记者横蛮无理的打压限制寻找子虚乌有的借口。
然而，恶人先告状并不能抹杀事实真相，嗓门大也不代表占据了道义制高点。美国国务院此次对中国媒体“出手”蓄谋已久。一段时间以来，美驻华使领馆对中国媒体赴美签证申请屡屡实行冗长的“行政审查”，包括申请探亲或随任的记者家属也不放过。
待到此次正式发起“突然袭击”，美国国务院更是将法理依据、程序正义等统统抛到一边，做出种种荒谬之举。比如，既然已将中国媒体归类为“外国使团”和“政府代表”，却又宣称绝不会给中国驻美记者任何“相应外交待遇”，且还要继续以“媒体类签证”管理这些记者；再比如，明知中美两国航班往来大幅减少，仍以极短期限逼数十名中国记者尽快离美。凡此种种，有良知的美国人士纷纷表示“匪夷所思”！
有目共睹，中国媒体的驻美记者数十年如一日做的只有一件事：严格遵守美国法律法规，恪守新闻职业操守，秉持客观、公正、真实、准确的原则开展新闻报道；中国记者在美国既没有搞意识形态输出，也没有热衷于“挖掘黑幕”“爆料炒作”，他们的报道经得起历史和时间的检验。
遗憾的是，美方罔顾事实，我行我素，蛮不讲理。当媒体发问，你们有没有抓到中国媒体报道有问题的证据？回答是“不需要”；当被问及“很多国家也有国有媒体，为什么单挑中国媒体打压”？回答更为赤裸裸：“这次就是要针对中国。”
透过美方一意孤行的强硬态度、咄咄逼人的施压招数，明眼人看得到其深层的虚弱和不自信。曾几何时，包括新闻自由在内的所谓“普世价值”还是美国向全球进行意识形态输出和展现“软实力”的一张王牌。如今，美国却因为丧失了实力自信、体制自信，逐步发展到患上“意识形态入侵”妄想症的地步，甚至试图通过大量驱逐别国记者来制造寒蝉效应，为外部世界报道和认知美国建起一道“隔离墙”。
实际上，美国政府打压中国媒体不仅丝毫无助于解决自身问题，还向包括美国同行在内的全球媒体发出信义尽失之信号，是自取其辱。眼下美方最应该做的是立即采取措施纠正对中国媒体贴歧视性标签、限制中国记者数量、对中国驻美记者设置签证障碍等错误做法，保障中国媒体驻美新闻工作者的合法权益，不要执迷不悟，在错误的道路上越走越远。







最后一天，美国对中国60名记者下狠手，中方发言人：只好奉陪到底
2020-03-13 13:36 看理想新闻
在中国14亿人民万众一心、众志成城抗击新冠肺炎疫情之时，美国国务院以莫须有的理由，出台系列针对中国媒体驻美机构的歧视性措施。继此前宣布将5家中国媒体作为“外国外交使团”列管后，美方又宣布自3月13日起，对列管的5家媒体中国籍员工数量采取限制措施。


所谓“外国外交使团”，主要还是与美国1982年颁布的《外交使团法》有关。按照该法的规定，外国使团包括两类：一是任何涉及外交、领事或其他活动的使团、机构或实体。二是由外国政府，或代表主权或政治实体的组织实际拥有或有效控制的使团、机构或实体。美国国务院此次动用《外交使团法》把五家中国新闻在美国的分支列为“外国外交使团”的理由，就是他们认为符合第二种情况。


需要指出的是，一旦美国的措施生效后，这5家中国新闻机构在美分支要向美国国务院报告所有人员，登记旗下所有租赁或拥有的物业。此外，这5家新闻机构的所有人员还需同使馆工作人员一样进行出行申报，人事变动和财务状况也要接受美国的审查和监督。

有分析人士指出，美国的举动，正是在变相驱逐中国记者。如此做法，严重侵犯了中国新闻工作者正常合法的海外新闻报道权益，严重损害了中国媒体和中国新闻工作者的声誉，严重干扰了中国媒体机构海外正常运转和中国新闻工作者的海外正常工作。目前中国驻美工作的记者大概为160人，而按照美国的决定，中国驻美记者将被缩减至少60人。


算起来，美国变相驱逐中国60名记者的时间只剩最后一天。对此，中国外交部发言人华春莹，早已做出明确表态，她指出：美国国务院限期要求中国驻美媒体大幅削减记者人数，是对中国媒体记者实行“实际上的驱逐”，毫无依据和道理，是美方基于冷战思维和意识形态偏见的政治打压，暴露出美方所谓“新闻自由”的虚伪性以及赤裸裸的“双重标准”和霸权欺凌。中方对此坚决反对并予以强烈遣责。美国既然宣布游戏开始，中国必将奉陪到底。

特别声明：以上内容(如有图片或视频亦包括在内)为自媒体平台“网易号”用户上传并发布，本平台仅提供信息存储服务。







北京驱逐美国三大报社记者，美国政府以及三大报回击

风国际
03-18 13:58
关注
围绕着新冠肺炎（COVID-19）疫情，中美之间的媒体战升级，中国北京时间3月18日凌晨宣布进一步驱逐美国媒体记者，美国方面发声回击。


美国政府和媒体抨击北京驱逐令

美国国安会（NSC）3月17日在社交网络推特上回击说：“中国决定将（美媒）记者从中国驱逐出去，这是剥夺中国人民和世界获取中国真实信息的又一步。”

美国国安会还呼吁中国将工作重点从“驱逐记者”和“散布假消息”转向与所有国家一起阻止武汉冠状病毒的传播。

与此同时，美国务卿蓬佩奥3月17日也在记者会上回应说，希望中国重新考虑。


美国务卿蓬佩奥

此外，被驱逐记者的美国三大报也发声批评北京。《华尔街日报》总编默里在推特上回应说，中国的举动是对新闻自由前所未有的攻击，该报反对政府干预世界上任何地方的新闻自由。

《华盛顿邮报》的执行主编拜伦也发表声明说，中国的决定尤其令人遗憾，因为它是在一场前所未有的全球危机的背景下做出的，现在有关国际社会对COVID-19的反应的明确而可靠的信息是至关重要的。中国现在寻求的是严格限制这类信息的流动，这只会使情况更加恶化。

《纽约时报》的执行主编巴奎表示，该报记者从19世纪50年代就开始在中国工作。两国快速解决纠纷，允许新闻工作者向公众提供信息，这至关重要。世界各地人民的健康和安全取决于对其两个最大经济体的公正报道。


中美媒体驱逐战升级过程

据悉，美国2月份将中国5家中国驻美媒体列为“外国使团”，这引发了中国的强烈不满。而在此期间，美国《华尔街日报》就新冠肺炎疫情发表文章，这使得中国不满加剧。中国继而宣布，驱逐3名《华尔街日报》驻北京记者。

美国方面批评了北京干涉言论自由，并且也做出回击。美国务卿蓬佩奥3月2日下令要求中国驻美五家国家媒体大幅减少其工作人员，变相驱逐中国驻美记者。按照新的限制措施，这几家中国机构在美国的中国籍雇员将从目前的总共160人被减少到100人。

3月18日，中国外交部发表声明宣布，针对美方大幅削减、实际驱逐中国媒体驻美机构员工，中方要求《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》、《华盛顿邮报》年底前记者证到期的美籍记者从即日起4天内向外交部新闻司申报名单，并于10天内交还记者证，今后不得在中国，包括香港、澳门特别行政区继续从事记者工作。

 

[obama.bin.laden]

Xinhua International Review: U.S. suppresses Chinese media for humiliation
2020-03-18 00:59:38 Source: Xinhuanet
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, March 18th, the question: US suppression of Chinese media is humiliating
Xinhua News Agency reporter
The US State Department recently used the so-called "reciprocity principle" as an excuse to limit the number of Chinese employees of five Chinese media in the United States and expelled Chinese media reporters in disguise. This set a "record" for a government in a large disguise to expel journalists from other countries on a large scale in disguise in the history of world journalism, leaving a difficult stain for the United States, which has long advertised itself as a "model" and "defender" of press freedom.
US government policymakers are not completely unaware of this. Therefore, in response to media queries, they declared that "this is only a restriction on the number, not an expulsion", and they repeatedly attacked "China restricts the freedom of press of foreign journalists in China" and sought for their unreasonable crackdown on Chinese journalists. Zi Xu's unexcusable excuses.
However, the first complaint of the wicked cannot obliterate the truth, and a loud voice does not mean that it has occupied the moral high ground. The U.S. State Department has been planning to "shoot" Chinese media for a long time. For some time, the US embassy and consulate in China has repeatedly implemented lengthy "administrative reviews" of visa applications for Chinese media to the United States, including family members or family members of journalists who have applied for visas.
When the "sudden attack" is formally launched, the US State Department has put aside the legal basis and procedural justice, and made all sorts of ridiculous actions. For example, since the Chinese media have been classified as "foreign missions" and "government representatives", they have declared that they will never give any "corresponding diplomatic treatment" to Chinese journalists in the United States, and will continue to manage them with "media visas" These reporters; for another example, knowing that the flights between China and the United States have drastically decreased, they still forced dozens of Chinese reporters to leave the United States as soon as possible within a very short period of time. In all these cases, Americans with a conscience have expressed "unbelievable"!
It is obvious to all that Chinese media reporters in the United States have done only one thing for decades: strictly abide by US laws and regulations, adhere to journalistic ethics, and carry out news reporting in accordance with the principles of objectivity, fairness, truth, and accuracy; They did not engage in ideological output or enthusiasm for "digging the shady" or "exploding speculation." Their reports stand the test of history and time.
Regrettably, the United States ignores the facts and behaves in a way that is unreasonable. When the media asked, did you catch any evidence that the Chinese media reported a problem? The answer is "no need"; when asked, "Many countries also have state-owned media, why single out Chinese media to suppress it?" The answer was even more stark: "This time we are targeting China."
Through the stubborn attitude of the US side and its aggressive pressure to exert pressure, the discerning person can see its deep weakness and self-confidence. Once upon a time, the so-called "universal value" including freedom of the press was a trump card for the United States to export its ideology and show its "soft power" to the world. Today, the United States has gradually developed to the point of suffering from the "ideological invasion" delusion because of its loss of self-confidence and institutional self-confidence. It has even tried to create a chilling effect by expelling journalists from other countries, reporting to the outside world and understanding the United States. Build a "wall".
In fact, the US government's suppression of the Chinese media not only did nothing to solve its own problems, but also sent a signal of loss of faith to the global media, including its American counterparts, as a shame. What the US should do right now is to immediately take steps to correct wrong practices such as putting discriminatory labels on Chinese media, limiting the number of Chinese journalists, and setting up visa barriers for Chinese journalists in the United States to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese media journalists in the United States. , Going further and further down the wrong path.







On the last day, the United States attacked 60 Chinese journalists. The Chinese spokesman had to accompany him to the end
2020-03-13 13:36 Watch ideal news
At a time when China ’s 1.4 billion people are united in their efforts to fight the new crown pneumonia epidemic, the US State Department has issued a series of discriminatory measures against Chinese media agencies in the United States for unreasonable reasons. After previously announcing the five Chinese media as "foreign diplomatic missions," the United States also announced that it would take restrictions on the number of Chinese employees in the five media under control from March 13.


The so-called "foreign diplomatic missions" are mainly related to the "Diplomatic Missions Law" promulgated by the United States in 1982. According to the provisions of the law, foreign missions include two types: one is any mission, institution or entity involved in diplomatic, consular or other activities. The second is missions, institutions or entities that are actually owned or effectively controlled by foreign governments or organizations representing sovereign or political entities. The reason the US State Department used the "Diplomatic Missions Act" to list the five branches of Chinese news in the United States as "foreign diplomatic missions" is that they believe that it fits the second situation.


It should be pointed out that once the US measures come into effect, the five Chinese news agencies in the United States will report all personnel to the US State Department and register all leased or owned properties. In addition, all the personnel of these five news organizations need to make travel declarations as well as the staff of the embassy, and personnel changes and financial conditions must also be subject to review and supervision by the United States.

Some analysts pointed out that the US move is precisely disguising Chinese journalists. This practice has seriously infringed on the normal and legitimate rights and interests of Chinese journalists in overseas news reporting, seriously damaged the reputation of Chinese media and Chinese journalists, and seriously disrupted the normal overseas operations of Chinese media organizations and the normal work of Chinese journalists overseas. At present, there are about 160 Chinese journalists working in the United States. According to the United States' decision, Chinese journalists in the United States will be reduced by at least 60.


By all accounts, the United States has only the last day to expel 60 Chinese journalists in disguise. In response, Hua Chunying, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has already made a clear statement. She pointed out that the U.S. State Department's deadline to require Chinese media in the United States to significantly reduce the number of journalists is a "actual deportation" of Chinese media reporters, without any basis. The reason is that the US side's political suppression based on Cold War thinking and ideological prejudice exposed the hypocrisy of the so-called "freedom of the press", as well as the naked "double standards" and hegemonic bullying. China firmly opposes this and strongly reprimands it. Now that the United States has announced the start of the game, China will sacrifice to the end.

Special statement: The above contents (including pictures or videos are also included) are uploaded and published from users of the media platform "NetEase account", this platform only provides information storage services.







Beijing expels reporters from three major US newspapers, U.S. government and three major newspapers fight back

Wind International
03-18 13:58
attention
Amid the epidemic of New Coronary Pneumonia (COVID-19) and the escalation of the media war between China and the United States, China announced in the early morning of March 18, Beijing time that the US media reporters were further expelled.


U.S. government and media slam Beijing eviction order

The National Security Council (NSC) responded on Twitter on March 17: "China's decision to expel (US media) reporters from China is another step in depriving the Chinese people and the world of access to true Chinese information."

The National Security Council also called on China to shift its focus from “deporting journalists” and “spreading fake news” to working with all countries to stop the spread of Wuhan coronavirus.

At the same time, US Secretary of State Pompeo responded at a press conference on March 17th, hoping that China would reconsider.


US Secretary of State Pompeo

In addition, the three major newspapers in the United States deported journalists also criticized Beijing. The Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief Murray responded on Twitter that China's move was an unprecedented attack on press freedom, and the newspaper opposed government interference in press freedom anywhere in the world.

"The Washington Post" executive editor Byron also issued a statement saying that China's decision is particularly regrettable because it was made in the context of an unprecedented global crisis, and the relevant international community's response to COVID-19 is now Clear and reliable information is essential. What China is now seeking to strictly restrict the flow of this information will only make the situation worse.

"The New York Times" executive editor Baku said that the reporter has been working in China since the 1850s. It is vital that the two countries resolve disputes quickly and allow journalists to provide information to the public. The health and safety of people around the world depend on impartial reporting on their two largest economies.


Sino-U.S. Media eviction war upgrade process

It is reported that the United States listed five Chinese media in the United States as "foreign missions" in February, which caused strong dissatisfaction in China. In the meantime, the US "Wall Street Journal" published an article on the new crown pneumonia epidemic, which aggravated China's dissatisfaction. China then announced the deportation of three Wall Street Journal correspondents in Beijing.

The United States has criticized Beijing for interfering with free speech and has responded. US Secretary of State Pompeo ordered on March 2 the Chinese media in the five US countries to significantly reduce their staff and disguise Chinese journalists in the United States in disguise. Under the new restrictions, the Chinese employees of these Chinese institutions in the United States will be reduced from the current total of 160 to 100.

On March 18, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China issued a statement announcing that, in response to the US ’s drastic reduction and the actual deportation of employees of Chinese media agencies in the US, the Chinese side required that the “New York Times”, “Wall Street Journal”, and “Washington Post” expiry of press passes before the end of American journalists will declare the list to the Information Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs within 4 days from today, and return the press card within 10 days. In the future, they will not be allowed to continue to work as journalists in China, including Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions.

Obama
bin

 

[laksaboy]

Thank you! Trump hates those libtard fake news merchants. 撸起袖子加油干！

 

[obama.bin.laden]

蓬佩奥指责中国“驱逐”美记者，耿爽：被骂一方有没有还击的权利？
环球网02-20 14:19
关注
耿爽在20日举行的外交部网上记者会上回应相关问询时表示，《华尔街日报》发表攻击抹黑中国的评论文章，还公然选用带有种族歧视色彩的标题，违背客观事实，违反职业道德，引起中国人民极大愤慨，也遭到了国际社会的广泛谴责。
【环球时报-环球网报道 记者白云怡】美国国务卿蓬佩奥19日发表声明称，对中方“驱逐”《华尔街日报》三名外国记者表示“谴责”，并称中方不应限制言论自由。对此，中国外交部发言人耿爽20日表示，此事并不像蓬佩奥说的那样是一个言论自由问题，而是对一个国家和民族的公然歧视，被辱骂者应拥有“还击的权利”。
耿爽在20日举行的外交部网上记者会上回应相关问询时表示，《华尔街日报》发表攻击抹黑中国的评论文章，还公然选用带有种族歧视色彩的标题，违背客观事实，违反职业道德，引起中国人民极大愤慨，也遭到了国际社会的广泛谴责。
“蓬佩奥先生动辄把言论自由挂在嘴边，难道发表公然侮辱一个国家和民族的歧视性文章，并且拒不承认错误，拒不道歉，就是美方所谓的言论自由吗？”耿爽反问道，“请问蓬佩奥先生：如果你认为《华尔街日报》有张口辱骂别人的自由，被辱骂者有没有还击的权利？”
特朗普将新冠病毒称为“中国病毒” 耿爽：美国首先要做好自己的事情

5.5万 | 00:42
新闻夜线2评
“限籍令”下：宁静出面辟谣，刘晓庆无辜躺枪，张铁林求生欲极强



Pompeo accused China of "deporting" US journalists. Geng Shuang: Does the accused party have the right to fight back?
Global Network 02-20 14:19
attention
Geng Shuang said in response to relevant inquiries at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' online press conference on the 20th that the Wall Street Journal published a review article that attacked and discredited China, and also openly selected racist headlines, contrary to objective facts and professional ethics This caused great indignation among the Chinese people and was widely condemned by the international community.
[Global Times-Global Network Reporter Bai Yunyi] US Secretary of State Pompeo issued a statement on the 19th saying that he "condemned" three foreign journalists from the "Wall Street Journal" and said China should not restrict free speech. In response, Geng Shuang, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said on the 20th that the matter is not a question of freedom of speech, as Pompeo said, but a blatant discrimination against a country and nation. right".
Geng Shuang said in response to related inquiries at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' online press conference on the 20th that the Wall Street Journal published a review article that attacked and discredited China, and also openly selected racist headlines, contrary to objective facts and professional ethics. This caused great indignation among the Chinese people and was widely condemned by the international community.
"Mr. Pompeo is always talking about freedom of speech. Is it possible to publish discriminatory articles that blatantly insults a country and nation, and refuse to admit his mistakes or apologies? Is this what the United States calls freedom of speech?" Geng Shuang asked. "Excuse me, Mr. Pompeo: If you think the Wall Street Journal has the freedom to openly abuse others, does the abuser have the right to fight back?"
Trump calls the new crown virus the "Chinese virus" Geng Shuang: The United States must do its own thing first

55,000 yen | 00:42
News Nightline 2 Comment
Under the "limitation order": quietly come forward to dispel rumors, Liu Xiaoqing lies innocent, Zhang Tielin has a strong desire to survive

 

[obama.bin.laden]

 

[obama.bin.laden]

http://www.fortunetimes.sg/cn/?p=25956

中国反击美管制 驱逐美3家报章记者
2020年03月18日 星期三
5871



WeChatFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsApp
Email分享

媒体敦促美国和中国两国政府尽快解决争端，不该剥夺媒体报道真相的自由，尤其是目前新冠疫情蔓延时期，真实且可靠的信息在当前尤其重要。（图：互联网）

（纽约2020年3月18日）随着美方对驻美国的中国“媒体”收紧管制之际，中国当局也勒令在中国大陆境内为三家美国媒体工作的所有记者在10天内交还“媒体证”，然后离开中国。

上述三家媒体包括了《纽约时报》（New York Times）、《华盛顿邮报》（Washington Post）和《华尔街日报》（Wall Street Journal）。

根据英国 《卫报》（The Guardian）的报道，中国当局通常只给记者发放12个月的签证和媒体证，因此这项举措将影响大多数记者，并迫使许多拥有数十年中国报导经验的记者离职。他们不仅将被禁止在中国大陆境内工作，也将被禁止在香港工作。

《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》和《华尔街日报》 三家媒体在美国记者遭到大规模驱逐后，分别发表声明回击中国，炮轰中方此举“不负责任”（irresponsible） ，具有“冷战”思维， 并对媒体自由展开了“史无前例的攻击”，尤其是在当前新冠病毒（COVID-19）疫情正在全球传播之际。

《纽约时报》执行编辑指出，中方驱逐外国记者的做法是极度不道德的事情，尤其是新冠病毒疫情“大流行”尚未结束。该报委员会指出，中国上述制裁行动是“冷战的不幸重演”，且不应该在这个这么糟糕的时候，这是因为新冠病毒正在全球范围传播，大家需要独立且可信赖的信息，尤其是对于来自疫情的发源地——中国的所有相关信息。
中国驻美媒体参杂了间谍？

在美国加强了对中国官方媒体的管制后，就中国的反击，《纽约时报》委员会说， 美国出版社并无法与“苏联”（Soviet）和“中共”（Chinese Communist）派遣海外的组织相提并论。“这是因为众所周知他们庞大的员工中包括了间谍。”该委员会也指出，中国不喜欢不倾向他们的报道。

《华盛顿邮报》驻中国的记者施家曦（Gerry Shih）也面对驱逐的命运，他透过推特（Twitter）指出，在中国境内的采访工作已经变得越来越困难；《华尔街日报》总编辑莫瑞（Matt Murray）则将中方此举称为，在危难时期，“对媒体自由展开史无前例的一次攻击。”

《华盛顿邮报》的执行编辑巴伦（Marty Baron）指出：“我们明确谴责中方驱逐美国记者的行为。尤其是目前全球正面临前所未有的危机，而国际间对获取COVID-19明确和可靠的信息至关重要的时候，中国当局此举非常令人遗憾。中国现在严格限制这类信息的流动，只会使到情况更加恶化。

《纽约时报》的执行编辑迪安·巴奎特（Dean Baquet）指出，中国做了一个“严重的错误”（grave mistake），并敦促美国和中国两国政府尽快解决争端。 “我们强烈谴责中国当局驱逐美国记者的决定，在世界需要有关新冠病毒大流行的自由、公开和可靠信息之际，这一行动尤其不负责任。 ”

员工遭到驱逐的上述三家报社，以及另外两家美国报纸《时代》（Time）和《美国之音》 （Voice of America），也被要求“以书面形式申报其在中国的员工、财务、运营和房地产信息”。
中方称此举是对美方无理管制的反击

中国表示，这是对美国上月收紧对中国官方媒体机构管制的回应，美国将中国官方媒体机构归类为外国使团（foreign missions）。 中国外交部指出：“近年来，美国政府对驻美国的中国媒体机构和个人展开‘无根据的管制’（unwarranted restrictions），故意让中国媒体在进行报道时困难重重，导致他们遭受越来越多的歧视和出于政治动机的压迫。”

“上述措施（驱除美国媒体）是完全必要的，也是对美国当局举措的一种对策。中国是对中国媒体机构在美国遭受的不合理压迫，被迫做出反击。”

美国国务卿蓬佩奥（Mike Pompeo）之后反驳了中国外交部的这种比较，并称驻美国的（中国）记者享有在中国不存在的新闻自由。

“我们几周前确认（纳入外国使团）的那些人不是媒体。他们是中国政治宣传（Propaganda）机构的人员。我们已经根据美国法律确定了这些外国使团。（中国）这些不是苹果对苹果（的比较），我对中国今天的决定感到遗憾，它进一步剥夺了世界新闻自由的权力。”



https://www.thestandnews.com/politics/中國要求紐時-華郵-wsj-交還記者證-不得在中港澳採訪/

中國要求紐時、華郵、WSJ 美籍記者交還記者證　不得在中港澳採訪
2020/3/18 — 1:29

AAA

中國政府今日宣布，就美方打壓中國媒體採取多項反制措施，要求《紐約時報》、《華爾街日報》、《華盛頓郵報》三間美國媒體，年底前記者證到期的美籍記者於 10 天內交還記者證，今後不得在中國從事記者工作，包括香港、澳門。
官方新華社今日發稿，斥美國政府對中國媒體駐美機構和人員的正常新聞報導活動無端設限，無理刁難，不斷升級對中國媒體的歧視和政治打壓，特別是 2018 年 12 月要求有關中國媒體駐美機構註冊為「外國代理人」，2020 年 2 月將 5 間中國媒體駐美機構列為「外國使團」。
新華社指，中方宣布自即日起，要求《紐約時報》、《華爾街日報》、《華盛頓郵報》年底前記者證到期的美籍記者，從即日起 4 天內向外交部新聞司申報名單，並於 10 天內交還記者證，今後不得在中國，包括香港、澳門繼續從事記者工作。
中方亦要求《美國之音》、《紐約時報》、《華爾街日報》、《華盛頓郵報》、《時代周刊》五間美國媒體駐華分社向中方申報在中國境內所有工作人員、財務、經營、所擁有不動產信息等書面材料。
中方指，上述措施完全是對美方無理打壓中國媒體駐美機構被迫進行的必要對等反制，完全是正當合理防衛，「中方敦促美方立即改弦更張、糾正錯誤，停止對中國媒體的政治打壓和無理限制。如果美方一意孤行，錯上加錯，中方也必將採取進一步的反制措施」。


http://www.fortunetimes.sg/cn/?p=25956


China counters U.S. control, expels 3 U.S. newspaper reporters
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
5871





WeChatFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsApp
Email Share


The media urged the governments of the United States and China to resolve the dispute as soon as possible and should not deprive the media of the freedom to report the truth, especially the current period of the new crown epidemic. Real and reliable information is especially important at the moment. (Figure: Internet)


(New York, March 18, 2020) As the US tightens its control over Chinese "media" in the United States, the Chinese authorities have also ordered all journalists working for three US media in mainland China to return their "media cards" within 10 days. And then leave China.


The three media outlets include the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal.


According to the British "The Guardian", Chinese authorities usually only issue visas and media cards to journalists for 12 months, so this move will affect most journalists and force many people with decades of Chinese reporting experience. The reporter leaves. Not only will they be barred from working in mainland China, they will also be barred from working in Hong Kong.


The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal issued separate statements to attack China after a large-scale deportation of American journalists, bombarding the Chinese move as "irresponsible", with a "cold war" Thinking, and launched an "unprecedented attack" on media freedom, especially as the current epidemic of the new coronavirus (COVID-19) is spreading globally.


"New York Times" executive editor pointed out that China's practice of expelling foreign journalists is extremely immoral, especially the "pandemic" of the new crown virus epidemic has not ended. The newspaper committee pointed out that the above-mentioned sanctions by China are "an unfortunate reenactment of the Cold War" and should not be at such a bad time. This is because the new crown virus is spreading globally and everyone needs independent and reliable information, especially for information from Origin of the epidemic-all relevant information on China.

Chinese media in the United States mixed with spies?


In response to China's counterattack after the United States strengthened its control over Chinese official media, the New York Times committee said that American publishers could not compare it with organizations dispatched by the "Soviet" and "Chinese Communist" overseas. "This is because they are known to include spies in their huge staff." The committee also noted that China does not like reports that do not favor them.


Gerry Shih, a reporter for The Washington Post in China, also faces the fate of deportation. He pointed out via Twitter that interviews in China have become increasingly difficult; Editor Matt Murray described the Chinese move as "an unprecedented attack on media freedom in times of crisis."


Marty Baron, executive editor of The Washington Post, said: "We explicitly condemn the deportation of American journalists by China. In particular, the world is currently facing an unprecedented crisis, and international clear and reliable information on COVID-19 has been obtained. At a crucial time, the Chinese authorities' move was very regrettable. China's strict restrictions on the flow of such information will only make the situation worse.


Dean Baquet, executive editor of the New York Times, noted that China had made a "grave mistake" and urged the US and Chinese governments to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. "We strongly condemn the Chinese authorities' decision to expel U.S. journalists, and this action is particularly irresponsible at a time when the world needs free, public and reliable information about the New Coronavirus pandemic."


The three newspapers whose employees were expelled, as well as two other American newspapers, Time and Voice of America, were also required to "declare in writing their employees, finances, operations in China And real estate information. "

China claims this move is a counterattack against unreasonable US controls


China said it was a response to the US ’s tightening of controls on Chinese official media agencies last month, which the United States classified as official foreign missions. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated: "In recent years, the US government has unwarranted restrictions on Chinese media organizations and individuals in the United States, deliberately making it difficult for Chinese media to report, causing them to suffer more and more. Discrimination and politically motivated oppression. "


"The above measures (to expel the US media) are absolutely necessary and a response to the actions of the US authorities. China is forced to fight back against the unreasonable oppression of Chinese media organizations in the United States."


US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo later refuted the comparison by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, saying that (Chinese) journalists in the United States enjoyed freedom of the press that does not exist in China.


"The people we confirmed a few weeks ago (incorporated in foreign missions) are not the media. They are members of the Chinese Propaganda Agency. We have identified these foreign missions under US law. (China) These are not Apple-to-Apple (Comparative), I regret China's decision today, which further deprives the world of press freedom. "




https://www.thestandnews.com/politics/中國要求紐時-% E8% 8F% AF% E9% 83% B5-wsj-% E4% BA% A4% E9% 82% 84% E8% A8% 98% E8% 80% 85% E8% AD% 89-% E4% B8% 8D% E5% BE% 97% E5% 9C% A8% E4% B8% AD% E6% B8% AF% E6% BE% B3% E6% 8E% A1% E8% A8% AA /


China asks New Zealand, China Post, and WSJ American journalists to return journalist badges to not cover China, Hong Kong and Macau

3/18/2020 — 1:29

AAA

The Chinese government announced today that it has adopted a number of countermeasures against the US in suppressing Chinese media, requiring the American journalists, including the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post, to expire within 10 days before the end of the press card Returning a journalist's card will not allow journalists to work in China in the future, including Hong Kong and Macau.

The official Xinhua News Agency issued a statement today, criticizing the U.S. government for unreasonably restricting the normal news reporting activities of Chinese media agencies and personnel in the United States, making it unreasonably difficult, and constantly escalating discrimination and political suppression of the Chinese media. In particular, in December 2018, the Chinese media US agencies are registered as “foreign agents” and in February 2020, five Chinese media agencies in the US were listed as “foreign missions”.

The Xinhua News Agency stated that the Chinese side announced from now on that they would require American journalists whose New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post expiry of their press passes before the end of the year to declare the list to the Information Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs within 4 days from today. Return your journalist ID within 10 days, and you will not be allowed to continue to work as a journalist in China, including Hong Kong and Macau.

The Chinese side also requires the five U.S. media outlets in the "Voice of America", "New York Times", "Wall Street Journal", "Washington Post", and "Time" to report to China all staff, financial, operating, Written materials including real estate information.

The Chinese side stated that the above measures were completely necessary to counter the necessary reciprocal countermeasures of the Chinese media in the United States, and were completely justified and reasonable defense. "China urges the United States to immediately change its course and correct its mistakes, and stop the political suppression of the Chinese media. Unreasonable restrictions. If the United States insists on doing it alone and makes mistakes, China will surely take further countermeasures. "

 

[obama.bin.laden]

http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2020-03/19/c_1125737318.htm

外交部：中国媒体已隐忍太久，美方却变本加厉
2020-03-19 18:57:25 来源： 新华网

关注新华网
微信
微博
Qzone
新华社北京3月19日电（记者王卓伦）外交部发言人耿爽19日在例行记者会上说，对美方种种打压和歧视性做法，中国媒体已经隐忍太久，但委曲未能求全，美方却变本加厉，中方将被迫根据对等原则对美国媒体记者采取相关措施。
有记者问:针对美方打压中国媒体驻美机构的行为，中方18日宣布了反制措施。其中第三条提到，美方在签证、行政审查、采访等方面对中国记者采取歧视性限制措施，中方将就此对美国记者采取对等措施。你能否介绍美方限制措施的具体事例？中方将采取的对等措施具体指什么？
耿爽说，美方对中国记者采取的歧视性限制措施，中国记协已经对外公布，中国有关媒体最近也有所披露。近年来，美国政府对中国媒体驻美机构和人员的正常新闻报道活动无端设限，无理刁难，不断升级对中国媒体的歧视和政治打压。
他表示，中国媒体驻美记者生活和工作正常秩序遭到严重破坏，许多人甚至回国休假后因美方无故拒签而无法返美工作，申请签证时被要求提供很多额外材料。特别是2018年12月美方要求有关中国媒体驻美机构注册为“外国代理人”，2020年2月将5家中国媒体驻美机构列为“外国使团”，随即又对上述5家媒体驻美机构采取人数限制措施，变相大量“驱逐”中方媒体记者。
“事实充分证明，美方标榜的所谓新闻自由是十分虚伪和具有欺骗性的。中方多次就美方错误做法向美方提出严正交涉，表达坚决反对和强烈谴责。”耿爽说。
耿爽表示，当遭遇不公待遇和无理打压，面对“双重标准”和霸权欺凌，中国记协已经代表中国媒体对美方进行了揭露，表明了坚决反对态度。“我们支持中国媒体坚定维护自身的声誉和利益，中方将被迫根据对等原则对美国媒体记者采取相关措施。”
图集


Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Chinese media have endured for too long, but the US has intensified
2020-03-19 18:57:25 Source: Xinhuanet


Follow Xinhua
WeChat
Weibo
Qzone

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, March 19 (Reporter Wang Zhuolun) Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said at a regular press conference on the 19th that the Chinese media have been tolerating the suppression and discriminatory practices of the US for too long, but failed to make perfect. The US side has intensified, and China will be forced to take relevant measures against US media reporters in accordance with the principle of reciprocity.

A reporter asked: In response to U.S. suppression of Chinese media agencies in the United States, China announced countermeasures on the 18th. The third article mentioned that the United States has adopted discriminatory restrictions on Chinese journalists in visas, administrative examinations, and interviews. China will take reciprocal measures against American journalists in this regard. Can you introduce specific examples of US restrictions? What exactly are the reciprocal measures China will take?

Geng Shuang said that the US has adopted discriminatory restrictive measures against Chinese journalists. The China Association of Records has announced it, and relevant Chinese media have also recently disclosed it. In recent years, the U.S. government has unreasonably restricted the normal news reporting activities of Chinese media agencies and personnel stationed in the United States, making it unreasonably difficult, and has escalated discrimination and political suppression of Chinese media.

He said that the normal order of life and work of Chinese media reporters in the United States was severely disrupted, and many people were unable to return to the United States to work because of the U.S. refusal of visas for no reason, and were asked to provide many additional materials when applying for visas. In particular, in December 2018, the United States requested relevant Chinese media agencies in the United States to register as "foreign agents." In February 2020, five Chinese media agencies in the United States were listed as "foreign missions." U.S. agencies have taken measures to limit the number of people and disguised a large number of Chinese media reporters in disguise.

"Facts have fully proved that the so-called press freedom advertised by the United States is very hypocritical and deceptive. China has repeatedly made solemn representations to the United States on the United States' wrong practices, expressing its firm opposition and strong condemnation." Geng Shuang said.

Geng Shuang said that when encountering unfair treatment and unreasonable suppression, facing "double standards" and hegemonic bullying, the Chinese Record Association has disclosed the US on behalf of the Chinese media, showing a firm opposition. "We support the Chinese media to firmly safeguard their own reputation and interests, and China will be forced to take relevant measures against American media reporters in accordance with the principle of reciprocity."
Atlas