American chief of SICC issues veiled threats in response to

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]American chief of SICC issues veiled threats in response to
tightening of foreign labour[/h]

PostDateIcon.png
November 13th, 2012 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial



overmyer.jpg

SICC Chief Phillip Overmyer


The PAP Govt has been gradually introducing policies to tighten foreign
labour in Singapore.

These include raising foreign worker levies, introducing stricter criteria
for S Passes and Employment Passes, lowering the dependency ratio ceilings to
hire foreign workers and more recently, raising the bar for foreigners applying
for Personalised Employment Passes (PEP).

The PEP, which among other things, allows foreign professionals to stay in
Singapore continuously for six months while being unemployed, will soon require
them to have a minimum annual fixed salary of $144,000 – up from the existing
$34,000 a year.

More measures to further calibrate the numbers of S Pass holders may also be
introduced soon.

Not surprisingly, Phillip Overmyer, Chief Executive of the Singapore
International Chamber of Commerce (SICC), which represents more than 700
multinational companies (MNC) based in Singapore, is not happy.

He said the frequent changes in such policies have not been helpful in their
(MNCs’) operations in Singapore. He wants the government to provide more clarity
on its foreign manpower policies for the next 5 years.

The SICC’s chief, who is an American, said, “What I really want to know
though, is not where are you going, next month or next year, but what’s very
important to the company is, tell me what the rules are going to be for the next
five years, because I want to build here in Singapore an operation that I can
support under the laws of Singapore.”

“When the law is sort of changed, well for this group we are going to change
it, and then a while later, we’re going to make another change in another group,
it becomes very, very hard for corporations to make a plan on how to produce a
product for the next four to five years.”

Overmyer added, “So our members are sort of waiting – let’s see what happens
when the government sorts all these out. In the meantime, we’ll struggle along a
little bit as best as we can.”

He then talked about companies “moving on” if they cannot “live with this new
situation”. He said, “The real issue will come up when, the companies finally
sit down and say, okay, company by company, they will have to decide, can I live
with this new situation, or is it time for me to move on, and that’s when we
will get a better understanding of where the companies are.”


In response, the Manpower Ministry (MOM) said the decision to slow the
foreign manpower growth was actually made two years ago based on the Economic
Strategies Committee (ESC) report. The Committee was set up in 2009 to
recommended strategies to restructure the economy away from labour-intensive
growth towards productivity and innovation-led growth for sustainable and
inclusive development. MOM added that changes introduced had been gradual, with
transition time given to existing workers who are affected and for companies to
adapt.

MOM stressed that foreign workers remain valuable to Singapore’s workforce
and economy, but should avoid over-dependence. While the government moderate
growth of foreign manpower, it will continue to welcome skilled foreigners who
complement the local workforce. The aim is to encourage companies to raise
productivity for a more sustainable growth.

Indeed, eyebrows were raised when it was revealed that foreign workers were
making a basic pay of only $500 a month at Panasonic Singapore, resulting in the
workers protesting against the management (‘Over 100 PRC workers at Panasonic Singapore start a petition‘).
At $500 a month, it sounds more like the salary of cheap labour than that of a
skilled foreigner.


Phillip Overmyer has been the Chief Executive of SICC since 2003. He was
previously Vice President of Samuels International, an international consulting
firm specializing in business, trade and investment matters for 1 year in 2002.
He was its VP Asia Pacific of Concert Global Services. Before that, he was in
the telecommunications industry for nearly 30 years including 12 years based in
Singapore. He was the Vice President of Global Services for AT&T in
Asia.

.

Join our TRE facebook page here: http://www.facebook.com/TREmeritus

.
 
I used to work for an american company & one of the things they did was to manage projects. Unfortunately they failed to win contracts because they had too many expensive americans in the team:rolleyes:

They would use use cheap 3rd world labor in their bids but when the costs of expat americans were added. It was just too high to win any bids.
 
Another talking cock chamber of commerce. There are no drastic changes, only minor tweeks to slow down net immigration, yet he can cry mother cry father. Either he is under encouragement from PAP to sing this tune publicly so that PAP can justify its past mistake, or he is complete idiot who should keep mouth shut. I suspect is the former, as a few other chambers of commerce also came out with similar statements.
 
The sad fact is that once 1 MNC pull out the rest will follow suit. Heard Micron is pulling out. It happened before in the 1980s so much so that the edb had to beg many if them to come back by offering many incentives. Looked like it's the beginning of the end for many many jobs here. They will the FTs with them. Many of the MNCs will not be coming back not with countries like Malaysian rolling out red carpets to these MNCs. Many of the new ministars will be made scrap goats.
No wonder the GLCs like ascendas developing a huge tech park in nusajaya in anticipation of this move.
 
See I told you so.

Motorola expands Malaysia presence

KEY REGIONAL BASE: US giant to open new call centre and network operations unit in Penang
MOTOROLA Solutions Inc, which has invested RM4 billion in Malaysia over almost four decades, plans to open a call centre and a network operations centre in Penang to support its global operations.

The facilities - the Motorola Solutions' Global Solutions Support Centre (call centre) and Network Operations Centre - will be officially launched on Wednesday.

Both centres will lend support for talent development and technology transfer in Malaysia.

The United States-based global technology giant has definitely picked up the cue from the government to expand its existing business activities to include services.

Slightly less than half of Motorola's products are exported to the US (43 per cent), followed by Asia (31 per cent). Europe, Middle East and Africa make up the balance 26 per cent.

Motorola Solutions provides business- and mission-critical communication products and services to enterprises and governments. In Malaysia, Motorola is a key industry player and has helped to shape the communications landscape for more than 38 years.

Motorola's largest research and development (R&D) centre and manufacturing plant for radio products in Asia are located in Penang. The centre also provides critical system support and solutions development for customers across Asia.

Motorola has time and again affirmed that Malaysia will continue to be an important regional base for the company as many of its regional centres are located in the country.

In an email interview with Business Times late last year, its corporate vice-president for Asia Pacific, Phey Teck Moh, said the Malaysian government's policies, aimed at developing the nation into an emerging knowledge-based economy, have made it ideal for global multinational corporations (MNCs) like Motorola to explore and invest in the country.

Motorola Solutions is one of the six MNCs selected by the government to share their learnings to enrich the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP). The company focuses on the electronics sector, including expanding the wireless communication ecosystem and radio-frequency identification.

Two of Motorola's senior R&D managers took part in the planning process of ETP.

Motorola is also involved in the collaborative research in engineering science and technology initiative, or Crest, an important component of the ETP.
 
KL’s ringgit policy benefits MNCs



By G Sivalingam, For the Business Times, 4 May 2011

M’sian SMEs that are export-oriented and that use local inputs are not favoured by the govt’s exchange-rate policy

MANY countries resist the appreciation of their currencies in an effort to maintain their international competitiveness. China has for many years resisted the pressure from the United States to revalue the yuan to close the American trade deficit with China.

However, Malaysia has allowed the ringgit to appreciate by about 11 per cent against the US dollar between January and December 2010. There were no conscious attempts to rein in the appreciation of the ringgit.

It seems to be a conscious policy to allow the ringgit to appreciate to increase the export competitiveness of several leading sectors of the economy, the chief among which is the electrical and electronics industry. It is a leading generator of exports from Malaysia.

The latest Annual Report of the Central Bank of Malaysia (Bank Negara Malaysia) released in March 2011 argues that a policy to allow the ringgit to appreciate is rational because it helps firms, especially those that source for their inputs internationally and sell their final output in the domestic market.

A strengthening ringgit would mean the cost of inputs would go down. And as their unit cost of production decreases, the domestic producer will be able to compete with imported final goods in the domestic market.

However, there is no critical mass of such domestic producers, unless we include multinational corporations (MNCs) that source for inputs internationally and produce for the domestic market.

A case in point is Matsushita, which sells Panasonic consumer products in the domestic market. But, in this instance, Matsushita because of the government’s ringgit policy will have an advantage over other domestic producers of the same or similar products, who source their inputs domestically. So, is the government pro-MNCs at the expense of the relatively smaller domestic entrepreneurs, who use local inputs?

The policy is also oriented to help the MNCs that are part of a global supply chain and manufacturing network. The MNCs will be able to import raw materials and inputs at a lower cost and will be able to part assemble them to be sent to another destination of the same MNC for further assembly or final processing.

In other words, Motorola or Texas Instruments will be able to import raw materials and inputs at a lower cost after the ringgit appreciation and process and assemble them before they send them to another branch of the same MNC for further processing or assembly.

Since trade is between the branches of the same MNC, they will be able to invoice each other and pay each other in US dollars. At the same time, they will be able to source for raw materials and inputs worldwide at a lower cost because the ringgit has appreciated.

The MNC will benefit from a ringgit appreciation because imports will cost less in US dollars and exports will be denominated in US dollars and so will remain competitive.

There is, therefore, an implicit bias in the foreign-exchange policy adopted by Bank Negara because it favours the further expansion and profitability of the export-oriented labour-intensive manufacturing MNC sector.

More significantly, this positive encouragement given to MNCs producing labour-intensive products for further processing and assembly by branches of the same MNC overseas clearly does not encourage the growth of knowledge-intensive industries in Malaysia.

The foreign-exchange advantage will attract more labour-intensive industries unless there is a clear policy to discourage them. But it is argued by Bank Negara that domestic players now have an incentive to import foreign technology at a lower price after the ringgit appreciation and so should take on the task of generating technological change and upgrading skill for knowledge-intensive industries. In other words, Bank Negara is using foreign exchange as a tool to provide incentives to local firms to import capital and knowledge-intensive technology to create the economic transformation that is the focus of Malaysia’s New Economic Model.

It is also hoped that as the domestic firms move up the technological ladder they will also increase their average wage levels as they will need to hire more skilled labour to handle the advanced technology.

The latest annual report of Bank Negara explicitly states that the ‘cheaper costs of imported inputs and capital would facilitate firms’ transformation from labour to capital-intensive production which could enhance firm productivity and ultimately profitability.

Increased productivity would encourage firms to pay higher wages and promote a more vibrant labour market with a larger pool of highly skilled workers.

While other countries have tried tax incentives to boost technological upgrading and increase wages, Bank Negara is, uniquely, hoping to generate the transformation to a knowledge-based, high-wage economy by allowing the ringgit to appreciate.

Bank Negara also argues that another sector that will potentially benefit from the ringgit appreciation is the construction sector because ‘the lower cost of imported inputs, together with stronger demand for properties in domestic markets, has helped construction firms to register stronger operating surplus during the year’.

In other words, the ringgit appreciation is acknowledged to help fuel the property price bubble already occurring in Malaysia.

Bank Negara, however, acknowledges that the ringgit appreciation has had a mixed effect on the services sector as it

(i) reduces the cost of imported inputs for producers who sell their

final output in the domestic market but it

(ii) hurts exporters of offshore services.

Bank Negara also explicitly acknowledges that the ringgit appreciation hurts MNCs which ‘mainly source inputs domestically in ringgit and export their services internationally in foreign currency’.

Bank Negara conducted a survey among businesses to assess the impact of the sharp appreciation of the ringgit on their profit margins.

The survey, which was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2010, showed that 28 per cent of the respondents reported that the ringgit appreciation had a favourable impact on their profit margins, whereas 34 per cent felt that the appreciation of the ringgit had an adverse impact on their profit margins.

More than a third (38 per cent) felt that the appreciation had no significant effect on their profit margins.

The survey was heavily biased towards the manufacturing sector as about 62 per cent of the respondents were from the manufacturing sector, 24 per cent were from the non-financial services sector and 14 per cent were from the construction sector.

If the majority of the respondents were export-oriented domestic small and medium enterprises (SMEs), that used local inputs, the results of the survey would have been different. These SMEs would probably be very adversely affected by the ringgit appreciation.

It is clear that SMEs in Malaysia that are export-oriented and that use local inputs are not favoured by the government’s exchange-rate policy. Bank Negara’s advice to them as stated in its latest Annual Report (page 78): ‘. . .be prepared to adapt to the changing environment, taking into account that such changes in relative prices,

if sustained, are a signal for a shift in real resources out of sectors with changing comparative advantage into sectors offering new opportunities with strong comparative advantage.’

The writer is visiting senior research fellow at the Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore
 
The sad fact is that once 1 MNC pull out the rest will follow suit. Heard Micron is pulling out. It happened before in the 1980s so much so that the edb had to beg many if them to come back by offering many incentives. Looked like it's the beginning of the end for many many jobs here. They will the FTs with them. Many of the MNCs will not be coming back not with countries like Malaysian rolling out red carpets to these MNCs. Many of the new ministars will be made scrap goats.
No wonder the GLCs like ascendas developing a huge tech park in nusajaya in anticipation of this move.

its about time we re-made the economy to rely less on low level manufacturing jobs (which are already dominated by malaysian and PRC aunties)

these MNCs are like locusts moving from place to place in search of the lowest labour costs. locusts like Phillip Overmyer should be encouraged to leave singapore.
 
It's not as simple as you think. It will start a huge chain reaction that will affect everybody hurting Singaporeans the most. Singapore will revert back to a third world country in 15 years.
 
It's not as simple as you think. It will start a huge chain reaction that will affect everybody hurting Singaporeans the most. Singapore will revert back to a third world country in 15 years.

I think you are being optimistic
 
Ang Moh Companies make money by 3rd world labor and debt inflated prices. We can also do the same. Anyway most Angmoh are only worth 1 USD/mth in value.
 
It's not as simple as you think. It will start a huge chain reaction that will affect everybody hurting Singaporeans the most. Singapore will revert back to a third world country in 15 years.

So many years on, we are still reliant on MNC to power our economy.If MNC find that we are so attractive, they will still come in. We boost 1st World infrastructure, good schools, good corporate governance, super efficient civil service, low corruption, safe street,good connectivity.

We have everything a MNC like to park their HQ here.

if the cost of doing business is too high, blame it on the govt. They are the greedy pigs who are reaping big time off the economy. Collecting 2.5 billion in foreign worker levies alone for yr 2011 !!
 
It's not unique to Singapore anymore. Malaysia fast catching up. Expect more announcements of relocation and retrenchments to come.
 
It's not as simple as you think. It will start a huge chain reaction that will affect everybody hurting Singaporeans the most. Singapore will revert back to a third world country in 15 years.

really? i tot we'll be back to fishing village in 5 years without dear leader... :rolleyes:

most of the peasants are living 3rd world lives anyway, so only the elites will be badly affected.
 
Back
Top