Alex Au will be crossing the heart on Saturday

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
The more I know about Tan Cheng Bock, the less I want to vote for him. Pealing away his gentle, avuncular demeanour, I find a troubling hole I cannot fathom. I cannot find an answer to a fundamental question: What does the man stand for?

I have no doubt he has compassion for the common people; I have no doubt that he is more in touch with the average Joe and Jill than the other leading PAP-associated candidate. This easy familiarity probably made him a fine constituency MP. In this presidential campaign however, there is an uncomfortable disconnection among the various ideas he has expressed, as if there is no overarching political philosophy.

And this possibility made my inability to read Tan Cheng Bock’s overall political philosophy all the more troubling. Where does he stand? I kept asking myself. What does he believe in?

Even Straits Times reporters have noted that Cheng Bock is hardest to read. Reporter Elgin Toh, for example, has written that of all the candidates, his position has shifted the most in the course of the campaign.

To an extent, I am voting tactically because I personally like Tan Kin Lian, but at this stage I think his chances are poor. I have no doubt about his personal integrity and where his heart lies. However, at several points in the campaign, he gave me the impression that he was out of his depth in areas outside of finance; he had not thought through other issues enough. He might make a good candidate at the next presidential election, but alas, he appeared rather less than ready for this one.


So I am endorsing Tan Jee Say. I am voting for him because as far as I can see, he is forthright about his views and holds values that are in rough alignment with mine. These are values anyone with a concern for human rights and human dignity would be comfortable with. He has made an effort to acknowledge the concerns of the gay, lesbian and transgender communities. And not least, because I judge that his convictions are sincere and strong, he has the will to stand by them and, of all the candidates, the fortitude to withstand the bullying that will surely come

- http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2011/08/25/i-endorse-tan-jee-say/
 
Tan Jee Say is against 377A, Alex Au is hoping the removal of the section so that his gay partner can poke his asshole!
 
Alex Au is disgusting. He's trying to politicise everything with poking backside. Disgusting using western liberalism to cover up his shamelessness. If 1 day I meet him, I sure spit on his face and shaft a broom up his backside. Pui!!!

This kachng kia every issue also can link to 377a can poke backside or not? KNN really disgusting. Pity his parents.
 
Last edited:
Alex Au is disgusting. He's trying to politicise everything with poking backside. Disgusting using western liberalism to cover up his shamelessness. If 1 day I meet him, I sure spit on his face and shaft a broom up his backside. Pui!!!

This kachng kia every issue also can link to 377a can poke backside or not? KNN really disgusting. Pity his parents.

sure or not , spit on his face. type in the forum, you can say anything you want, but you got the balls to do it or not.
 
I dont recall he said that anywhere. During the CNA telecast, the poser was whether he minded if the Act was removed and he answered clearly that he does not mind the removal of 377A.

Are you English educated? Do you need help?

Tan Jee Say is against 377A, Alex Au is hoping the removal of the section so that his gay partner can poke his asshole!
 
Back
Top