• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Alex Au - $1 for $4 in benefits. A thoughtful piece.

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Let’s start with a bird’s eye view. Individuals who don’t own cars pay, in the main, two kinds of taxes: personal income tax and the Goods and Services Tax (GST), which is currently rated at 7 percent. As you can see from the pie chart I found from the Finance Ministry’s website (above), each of these two types of taxes contribute about 15 percent to the total budget revenue. (Personal income tax is the pale lime slice; GST is the strawberry cream slice). Together, they make up about 30 percent. In other words, the government has more than than three times as much money as they collect from individuals for the various kinds of governmental spending.

Some of that spending cannot be considered ‘benefits’ except by a great stretch, e.g. defence or certain infrastructure projects. But still, there’s more money available for ‘benefits’ than the 30 percent collected from personal income taxes and GST. Hence, to have an overall Benefits-to-Personal Taxes ratio of 1.5 or more is therefore not remark-worthy at all.

- https://yawningbread.wordpress.com/...ice-part-2-low-income-tax-payers-hit-jackpot/
 
Back
Top