• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

AIM bought the software to help town councils

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
28,295
Points
113
Aim put in a bid for the rights of the IT software because it wanted to help the town councils, its chairman S. Chandra Das said.

If that is the case, why is AIM charging management fees on top of monthly lease of software?
 
Aim put in a bid for the rights of the IT software because it wanted to help the town councils, its chairman S. Chandra Das said.

If that is the case, why is AIM charging management fees on top of monthly lease of software?

The answer is simple. You need manpower n resources to help
 
Strange...a two dollar company is pre qualified to take part in tender? Shldnt that raise alarm bells ?
 
Strange...a two dollar company is pre qualified to take part in tender? Shldnt that raise alarm bells ?

Is there any legal restrictions on $2 companies taking part in a tender for such a project sir?
 

Is there any legal restrictions on $2 companies taking part in a tender for such a project sir?

There should be a minimum paid up capital for projects of this nature to qualify for open tender ; unless it was a closed tender then I can't comment . All other companies invited to tender were all big paid up capital entities and only AIM responded to the tender which raises series of questions to ponder at.
 
AIM is not any ordinary $2 company.
It's backed by 3 pappy lackeys who were former MPs no less.
That in the 60.1% minds is as good as a public listed company status.
 
What resources? Where is their office and how many staff do they have? How was the fees collected used? What kind of maintenance was conducted for a software that was going to be obsolete and decommission in a couple of months?
 
AIM is not any ordinary $2 company.
It's backed by 3 pappy lackeys who were former MPs no less.
That in the 60.1% minds is as good as a public listed company status.

Please lah,the pap think we sinkees are all 3 year old kids and want to bluff its way out .
The pap's entanglement in this scandal is so deep that all the black and white evidence shows prima facie case of corruption,collusion and nepotism.
 
Aim put in a bid for the rights of the IT software because it wanted to help the town councils, its chairman S. Chandra Das said. ...
a $2 coy ...

wif no proper own offis, no staff, no relevant expertise n knowledge, no nutting ... want 2 help town councils? ... wat a joke! ...

n ze biggest joke is town councils actuarry awarded tender 2 dem! ...
 

Is there any legal restrictions on $2 companies taking part in a tender for such a project sir?

Not sure.

But the White Scums and Minibond TeoHP are morally, professionally, logically required to consider such factor when awarding the tender.
 
Precisely:D

Why did they NOT restrict a S$2 dollar company from participating in a tender:confused::confused:



they are the DIRECTOR,PRODUCER, SCRIPT WRITER AND LEADING ACTORS

even their email is HOTMAIL

director signed of WITHOUT NAME

this type of company machiam those SIM LIM SQUARE SALESMANS
 
Last edited:
Aim put in a bid for the rights of the IT software because it wanted to help the town councils, its chairman S. Chandra Das said.

If that is the case, why is AIM charging management fees on top of monthly lease of software?

AIM wanted to help only PAPzi town councils. But ALL ton councils exist to cater to the needs of its residents. Somewhere along the way the town councils seem to have forgotten their obligatory role to the residents. Selling off the ownership for the rights to the software from residents to a private company without ensuring that residents to receive similar or better services is a sign of poor management and rendering of services.

Lastly, the talk that PAP MPs require high salaries because when they retire they do not go on talks or write books is put to rest as we know that a large number of former PAP MPs are hired in GLCs and in companies such as AIM. Whether AIM makes money from this transaction is only a question of time. Should AIM still insist that they did not make money then we should ask how much it costs to develop the original software and whether AIM will stop collecting money from the town councils once they have recovered the full amount that they paid for the software.
 
Back
Top