154th Let Out FAP Attack Dogs on WP to Deflect Attention from AIM Corruption

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]ST keeps publishing letters asking about FMSS when WP has already
explained
[/h]


PostDateIcon.png
May 18th, 2013 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial



In the ST Forum page today (18 May), ST published a letter from a Mr S.
Ramamirtham (‘Time for managing agent to come clean’), essentially attacking WP
in the recent AIM saga in Parliament.

20130518_154626.jpg


Mr Ramamirtham wrote:


“When Workers’ Party (WP) chairman Sylvia Lim brought up the Action
Information Management issue last year, she surely expected the People’s Action
Party and the Government to come clean on the matter.


And they did come clean, first with a comprehensive report by the
National Development Ministry and then the debate in Parliament on
Monday.


In fact, it was revealed that the WP-appointed managing agent, in the
form of husband-and-wife company FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), was set up
just four days after the WP won Aljunied GRC in the 2011 General
Election.


Just who are this couple? Shouldn’t they speak up for themselves in the
face of so much public discussion?


Perhaps it is time for Ms Lim to call a press conference and introduce
the couple to the public, and let them answer all the burning questions that
have been raised in the media and, most importantly, come clean, like what the
Government did in Parliament earlier this week.


Accountability and transparency have to work both ways – not just for the
government of the day but also for the opposition
parties.”

In fact, WP has already come clean. Ms Lim has already explained in
Parliament as well as in the follow-up media statements, stating how FMSS came
about becoming the managing agent of Aljunied TC.

She wrote that after GE in May 2011, the then PAP managing agent, CPG
Facilities Management, asked to be released from its contract with Aljunied TC
(‘After
GE 2011, CPG actually wanted out of Aljunied TC
‘), thereby putting the
Aljunied TC in a fix.

At the time there were only 3 companies in the market providing TC management
and services: Esmaco, EM Services and CPG, all which are linked to PAP in one
way or another.

She said, “The set-up of FMSS was due to the very real possibility that WP
would be faced with no other company to manage AHTC.”

“None of FMSS’ shareholders and directors are WP members and FMSS is not a
WP-owned company. FMSS was engaged based on its directors’ experience in
property management, professional skills and track record in running Hougang
Town Council. One of the directors of FMSS was the former GM of Hougang Town
Council.”

She said that due to the urgency of continuing providing TC services to the
residents after the withdrawal of CPG, as TC Chairman, she decided to waive the
tender for the MA contract and engaged FMSS directly for the first year.

The waiver was within the rights of the Chairman under the Town Council
Financial Rules in certain circumstances. In the second year when things went
back to normal, an open tender was called. FMSS was the only one who submitted
the bid.

She said, “AHTC was aware of its duties when dealing with a sole tenderer,
and that the TC needed to ensure value for money for its residents. AHTC had
also commissioned a special external audit of the tender award as an additional
assurance of compliance and good governace practices, and that steps had been
taken to ensure value for money.”

In another statement, Ms Lim also added, “If the Minister, Dr Teo or the
Ministry believe there was any wrongdoing in WP’s management of the Town
Council, we invite them to make a report to the Corrupt Practices Investigation
Bureau or other relevant agencies to investigate the matter, rather than to make
these suggestions and insinuations. We assure these agencies of our full
co-operation.”

Hence, with the detail explanation put up by WP, it’s not known why ST keeps
publishing letters and articles asking about FMSS.

Who is S. Ramamirtham?

TRE did a cursory search on “S. Ramamirtham” on the Net and it appears that
Mr Ramamirtham is a frequent letter writer to the mainstream media:


“Opposition
not needed”, Today, 28 Jul 2001

“My call to all Singaporeans: Don’t
fall into the trap of the opposition. Singapore doesn’t need an opposition in
Parliament – it is of no use to the betterment of the country.”


“SM
Lee and PAP did well”, Today, 7 Sep 2001

“Singaporeans must be happy
that Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew has helped bring about a breakthrough in
negotiations on bilateral issues between Singapore and Malaysia…”


“Thorough
drubbing on Polling Day?”, Today, 5 Oct 2001

“The impression I get
from reading your article ‘Ripple effect’ (Today, Oct 2) is that Singapore’s
opposition parties are not only going to waste the voter’s time during the
coming election rallies, they also ought to be given a thorough drubbing by the
electorate on Polling Day… I think if the PAP is returned resoundly to power
again, it will be able to do a better job.”


“Where
there’s a will, there’s water”, Today, 15 Sep 2005

“Over the years,
the Singapore Government has, through the leadership of three Prime Ministers,
Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Mr Goh Chok Tong and now Mr Lee Hsien Loon, enlarged every
possible resource and supply of water that can benefit this country and its
people.”

In any case, if Mr S. Ramamirtham or ST continues to feel that there was any
wrongdoing in WP’s management of the Town Council, they can simply take Ms Lim’s
advice and make a report to CPIB rather than continuing to insinuate. Ms Lim has
said that they will fully co-operate with the relevant agencies in their
investigations.

.

Join our TRE facebook page here: http://www.facebook.com/TREmeritus
 
The corrupted practice of PAP is being exposed in the AIM episode. Now they are going on a smear campaign trying to deflect the attention.
 
[h=2]AIM saga – MND’s failure to distinguish politics from
policies
[/h]


PostDateIcon.png
May 17th, 2013 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions




Sometime after the last General Election, soon after I agreed to act as the
Chief Editor of The Online Citizen, a junior staff from the PAP Government asked
if he could meet me in my capacity as head of TOC, as well as some other young
people from TOC to discuss how disenchanted young people may be engaged.

I met him soon after with some friends from TOC, and at this meeting, this
person emphasised that he had taken leave and was meeting us in his personal
capacity. His message to us was simple. He said that the Government was
apolitical, that we should not confuse politics of a political party with
policy initiatives of the Government, and that he wished that youths would see
this distinction and would work with the Government in making better
policies.

Even though I knew that it was impossible to totally divorce politics
from policies and even if this junior staff’s proposal sounded like a tired old
proposal by the Government to engage, it sounded sincere enough, coming soon
after General Election 2011, that this Government will choose engaging the
disenchanted over Party politics.

But how this PAP Government has responded to Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East
Town Council (AHPE) in the AIM saga, has totally shattered any hope that the
ruling Party can or will make any distinction between politics, policies and
good governance.

“Where is the missing $1 million?” ~MND Press Statement (link: http://bit.Iy/145pNbA)

As the Ministry of National Development (MND) sets the broad legislative
framework and financial guidelines under the Town Councils Act and Town Council
Financial Rules to ensure proper governance and accountability by Town Councils,
MND should have sought clarifications from AHPE before making such insinuations.
That would have been the right thing to do, and would have amplified to the
disenchanted members of the public that this is a Government which can make
clear distinctions between politics and policies.


We also have to keep our system open and
contestable. The political system must be such that it is easy for people to
come in to contest, form a party and participate. To win cannot be so easy
because if you win, that is a big thing, and your voice will count so you must
achieve a high standard to win. But to contest it cannot be difficult. You
cannot require a lot of money…It is cheap to contest but the hurdle to get
elected should be high because you want to maintain the quality of the MPs and
the quality of the political leadership and the political debate. The way to
make the hurdle high is for voters to vote for the party and the leaders who
will serve them best. The system encourages that because once an MP is elected,
he looks after your constituency, he is responsible for your Town Council, he
does not just make speeches in Parliament.”
~PM Lee Hsien Loong at
Kent Ridge Ministerial Forum on 5 April 2011 (link: http://bit.Iy/mJUeiZ)
From PM Lee’s speech at the Kent Ridge Ministerial Forum we can understand
why MND has attacked AHPE so viciously, especially when they had the right as
well as the channel to clarify ‘the missing $1 million’. The opposition-held
town councils cannot do well if the PAP is to have any chance of recapturing it
at the next General Election. Is that another reason why opposition-held town
councils keep doing so badly in the Town Council Management Report? (see http://bit.Iy/12fXUuY and http://bit.Iy/12fXUuY)

Against this backdrop, it is understandable why AHPE appointed a company they
know for sure is not owned or affiliated to the People’s Action Party (PAP). In
fact, until the recent sitting in Parliament, no one knew if AIM is the only
company PAP owned. I can certainly imagine the ways in how a PAP-owned company
can sabotage an opposition-held town council, if the management of the town
council’s functions are outsourced to such companies.

So, coming back to the AIM saga, these are the facts:

wpdata1.jpg
And these facts clearly show that this PAP Government has not given citizens
appropriate answers about the AIM-saga, but is just trying to deflect blame by
pointing their fingers at the relationship between AHPE and FMSS. I wonder if
MND’s recent review of the AIM saga also involved analysing how AHPE can be
dragged through the m&d.

.
Ravi Philemon

* This article was first published in Ravi Philemon’s blog at
http://www.raviphilemon.net. He is a member of NSP.


.
 
Just what the fucking SPH and the PAP ordered....another mother cheebye head shaking kekling kiah cocksucker to blast out at their enemies......


Like the fucking indian show put up by that fatfuck bayi Inderjit Singh and his fellow kekling headshaker for their dumbassed allegations in the 2005 elections nominations day fiasco...what a bunch of cicksucking cretins....anybody here got a video of those 2 dogs and their melodrama???
 
The corrupted practice of PAP is being exposed in the AIM episode. Now they are going on a smear campaign trying to deflect the attention.

Standard practice of the PAP cockcroaches in white.
Perfected by smear of shit on sole of shoe Lee Kuan Yew
Taught in classes for maggots in white

FUCK AND SCREW, FUCK AND SCREW
TELL LIES AND MORE LIES AND TELL LIES AGAIN
 
Personally, I don't see what the problem is setting up a company to go into a contract. As all businessmen know, it is better to contract as a limited company rather than a sole proproetor.

Why is the PAP harping on this irrelevant point?
 
TODAY
Wednesday, May 9, 2001

What will JBJ fight for this time?

I READ with great sadness that MrJ B Jeyaretnam intends to contest the next General Election (TODAY, May 4).

I assume he's confident of not being declared a bankrupt by election time. If he's declared a bankrupt before that, he's going to blame the Government for attempting to keep him out of the polls.

When the Prime Minister called a by-election in 1992 in his Marine Parade GRC, to give Mr Jeyaretnam a chance to contest, the latter could not form a GRC team.

And what did we have that year? The "hunger striker" Dr Chee Soon Juan, who contested on the SDP ticket and later took over the secretary-general's post from Mr Chiam See Tong.

Hasn't Mr Jeyaretnam learnt that he is not wanted or needed on the Singapore political scene?

What is he going to fight for this time if he decides to contest or even support opposition candidates?

His favourite topics: Workers' rights? Human rights? Upgrading programmes? Public accountability? What's new in his arguments?

He talks about being accountable to the public. Will the Open Singapore Centre be transparent as well?

The best thing for Mr Jeyaretnam to do is to sit back, reflect on what he has achieved or never achieved and enjoy his retirement.

If any award should be given to him, it should be one for the politician best known for having spent all his money paying libel damages to Singapore's leaders, election after election.

And the biggest beneficiaries - the various charities in Singapore and the Community Chest.

Our leaders have donated the monies to these charities whenever they received them.

So, Mr JBJ, take a break. Gone are the Anson days you used to rave about. No one remembers Anson, not the younger generation who will make up the larger electorate in Singapore.

Don't end up in the soup again. There's really no money left in the kitty to help you.

S. Ramamirtham
 
fucking shameless ah neh running dogs. jbj is a sinkee who fought for sinkees till the very last. and limpeh respect jbj. at least he never give up believing sinkees will have a better tomorrow without the pappies.

fuck pappies and fuck lky and lhlm chow chee bye how come lhl cancer never return arh?

this type of chee bye face can also be pm. knn, limpeh rather go elsewhere then be ruled by this cancer loong.
 
Who is S. Ramamirtham?

TRE did a cursory search on “S. Ramamirtham” on the Net and it appears that
Mr Ramamirtham is a frequent letter writer to the mainstream media:


“Opposition
not needed”, Today, 28 Jul 2001
“My call to all Singaporeans: Don’t
fall into the trap of the opposition. Singapore doesn’t need an opposition in
Parliament – it is of no use to the betterment of the country.”

“SM
Lee and PAP did well”, Today, 7 Sep 2001
“Singaporeans must be happy
that Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew has helped bring about a breakthrough in
negotiations on bilateral issues between Singapore and Malaysia…”

“Thorough
drubbing on Polling Day?”, Today, 5 Oct 2001
“The impression I get
from reading your article ‘Ripple effect’ (Today, Oct 2) is that Singapore’s
opposition parties are not only going to waste the voter’s time during the
coming election rallies, they also ought to be given a thorough drubbing by the
electorate on Polling Day… I think if the PAP is returned resoundly to power
again, it will be able to do a better job.”

“Where
there’s a will, there’s water”, Today, 15 Sep 2005
“Over the years,
the Singapore Government has, through the leadership of three Prime Ministers,
Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Mr Goh Chok Tong and now Mr Lee Hsien Loon, enlarged every
possible resource and supply of water that can benefit this country and its
people.”


Dogs are known to be loyal to their Masters..

But this Keling put all dogs to shame with his amazing loyalty towards the PAP..
 
TODAY
Wednesday, May 9, 2001

What will JBJ fight for this time?

I READ with great sadness that MrJ B Jeyaretnam intends to contest the next General Election (TODAY, May 4).

I assume he's confident of not being declared a bankrupt by election time. If he's declared a bankrupt before that, he's going to blame the Government for attempting to keep him out of the polls.

When the Prime Minister called a by-election in 1992 in his Marine Parade GRC, to give Mr Jeyaretnam a chance to contest, the latter could not form a GRC team.

And what did we have that year? The "hunger striker" Dr Chee Soon Juan, who contested on the SDP ticket and later took over the secretary-general's post from Mr Chiam See Tong.

Hasn't Mr Jeyaretnam learnt that he is not wanted or needed on the Singapore political scene?

What is he going to fight for this time if he decides to contest or even support opposition candidates?

His favourite topics: Workers' rights? Human rights? Upgrading programmes? Public accountability? What's new in his arguments?

He talks about being accountable to the public. Will the Open Singapore Centre be transparent as well?

The best thing for Mr Jeyaretnam to do is to sit back, reflect on what he has achieved or never achieved and enjoy his retirement.

If any award should be given to him, it should be one for the politician best known for having spent all his money paying libel damages to Singapore's leaders, election after election.

And the biggest beneficiaries - the various charities in Singapore and the Community Chest.

Our leaders have donated the monies to these charities whenever they received them.

So, Mr JBJ, take a break. Gone are the Anson days you used to rave about. No one remembers Anson, not the younger generation who will make up the larger electorate in Singapore.

Don't end up in the soup again. There's really no money left in the kitty to help you.

S. Ramamirtham

We will always remember the Spirit of Anson..

We will always remember the sacrifices of the Late Mr JBJ..

We will always remember PAP scums like S Ramamirtham Pundek who mother was an old hooker from Desker Rd..
 
Back
Top