• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

$1000 vs $46,000 Justice ?

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,134
Points
83
I am sure you the read the article about the Vet Nurse fined $46,000 for neutering cats and then we we have Woffles Wu getting fined $1000 for twice providing the wrong name.

Seems completely out of whack.

Not sure if the uncle who brought her the cats also ended up with a hefty fine.




AsiaOne
Thursday, Jun 28, 2012

SINGAPORE - Looking to make a quick buck, a nurse working for a local vet conspired with another to turn her Bishan Street flat into an animal clinic where she charged at least $50 to sterilise each cat.

The Straits Times reported that Sarah Saralah Chandrasekeren, 26, used her dining room table for the operations to sterilise 366 cats between November 2010 and last September.

She was aided in her crime by Ho Chee Chin, 47, who delivered cats he collected on behalf of the Cat Welfare Society to the clinic Chandrasekeren was working for.

Chandrasekeren was then a surgery nurse helping Dr Lim Ai Cheng at his Geylang East Avenue 3 clinic.

Ho was acquainted with her, and when he learnt of her financial troubles, he hatched the plan to deliver the cats to her occasionally for her to sterilise them in her home.

She would then hand him a receipt with the Clinic for Pets company stamp for Ho to submit to the Cat Welfare Society.

In return, he would earn a $5 commission for each cat he delivered.

The duo were discovered when the Cat Welfare Society discovered that there were two different company stamps being used on the receipts it collected from the clinic and alerted Dr Lim.

Chandrasekeren had continued to use the company's old stamp instead of the new stamp with a different design.

For the theft of the receipt book, she was fined $600.

The two were also slapped with 10 charges for the use of her home as a vet centre, and 36 charges for treating animals without an AVA licence.

They were each fined $1,000 for each charge, bringing the total amount to $46,000.

Each charge carries a maximum penalty of up to $10,000, a jail sentence of one year, or both.


[email protected]
 
nurse qualified to perform sterization one meh?

i tot only doctors can do so? :D
 
I am sure you the read the article about the Vet Nurse fined $46,000 for neutering cats and then we we have Woffles Wu getting fined $1000 for twice providing the wrong name.

Seems completely out of whack.

Not sure if the uncle who brought her the cats also ended up with a hefty fine.




AsiaOne
Thursday, Jun 28, 2012

SINGAPORE - Looking to make a quick buck, a nurse working for a local vet conspired with another to turn her Bishan Street flat into an animal clinic where she charged at least $50 to sterilise each cat.

The Straits Times reported that Sarah Saralah Chandrasekeren, 26, used her dining room table for the operations to sterilise 366 cats between November 2010 and last September.

She was aided in her crime by Ho Chee Chin, 47, who delivered cats he collected on behalf of the Cat Welfare Society to the clinic Chandrasekeren was working for.

Chandrasekeren was then a surgery nurse helping Dr Lim Ai Cheng at his Geylang East Avenue 3 clinic.

Ho was acquainted with her, and when he learnt of her financial troubles, he hatched the plan to deliver the cats to her occasionally for her to sterilise them in her home.

She would then hand him a receipt with the Clinic for Pets company stamp for Ho to submit to the Cat Welfare Society.

In return, he would earn a $5 commission for each cat he delivered.

The duo were discovered when the Cat Welfare Society discovered that there were two different company stamps being used on the receipts it collected from the clinic and alerted Dr Lim.

Chandrasekeren had continued to use the company's old stamp instead of the new stamp with a different design.

For the theft of the receipt book, she was fined $600.

The two were also slapped with 10 charges for the use of her home as a vet centre, and 36 charges for treating animals without an AVA licence.

They were each fined $1,000 for each charge, bringing the total amount to $46,000.

Each charge carries a maximum penalty of up to $10,000, a jail sentence of one year, or both.


[email protected]

Mr Kuan would have bailed her out of this.
 
No, I didnt read about this. And I don't understand it either. But, I'm sure the AG's chambers will have a perfect answer...
 
There is a scale of punishments administered by the courts based on Edibility Index.

If they think you can be 'jiak' (eaten), so a small fry, then they bestow the heaviest fine. If they find you are a great big white, then cannot 'jiak' lah, so impose 'wayang wayang' fine.
 
In the Game of Russian Poker, jiak lu 3 tuk kow (eaten from head to end, like Plug, claim, Royal Flush & etc).
This is the style of PAP, just they (PAP) have done that before, and can continue to do it. But haven't they realized this method (jiak lu 3 tuk kow) cannot be applied anymore. The power of Internet.. (even like China made several blockage in the internet, nothing is FOOL proof).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top