• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious The real fake news masters...LHL, IndraLee Rajah...more to come before July 3

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Government has been warning about fake news recently, urging Singaporeans to be more critical and discerning when reading things online.

Yet, presently, it is ministers themselves, including the Prime Minister, who are making unsubstantiated allegations against the Prime Minister’s siblings and in-laws, on social media channels online.

In particular, they have been questioning the “troubling” circumstances surrounding the making of Lee Kuan Yew’s Last Will in December 2013.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has raised questions about the role of Lee Suet Fern, the wife of his brother, Lee Hsien Yang, in the inclusion of certain content of the will. While he didn’t outright accuse her of fraud, the insinuation seems to be that.

Also, the Senior Minister of State (SMS) for Law, Indranee Rajah, has repeated the same inference in a post on Saturday on her Facebook page.

All this while Singaporeans await the sitting of Parliament on 3 July where PM Lee said he will deliver a ministerial statement on the saga, and ministers say they will also be speaking on the matter.

First, it is disconcerting that the Prime Minister would himself cast such aspersions on Ms Lee, without offering more concrete proof of any wrongdoing. Ditto Ms Indranee, and especially so given she is the SMS for Law. One would have thought she would know better than to offer nothing more than insinuations.

Second, it is worth remembering that the Last Will was made and signed by Lee Kuan Yew 4 years ago.

PM Lee did not raise any questions about the will then, before probate was given by the courts.

It is also worth keeping in mind that PM Lee’s personal lawyer at the time was Lucien Wong, who was later appointed Attorney General in early 2017. It is thus reasonable to say that PM Lee had the best legal advice available to him.

Now, only after 4 years, is PM Lee and his government claiming that there are dubious circumstances surrounding the Last Will’s finalisation.

While the silence by PM Lee and the Government during the 4-year time lapse is questionable, even if consideration is to be given to their concerns, it should be the courts which should be the arbitrator, and not the court of public opinion.

In other words....


https://publichouse.sg/govt-should-take-matter-to-court-and-not-make-insinuations-on-social-media/
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Government has been warning about fake news recently, urging Singaporeans to be more critical and discerning when reading things online.

Yet, presently, it is ministers themselves, including the Prime Minister, who are making unsubstantiated allegations against the Prime Minister’s siblings and in-laws, on social media channels online.

In particular, they have been questioning the “troubling” circumstances surrounding the making of Lee Kuan Yew’s Last Will in December 2013.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has raised questions about the role of Lee Suet Fern, the wife of his brother, Lee Hsien Yang, in the inclusion of certain content of the will. While he didn’t outright accuse her of fraud, the insinuation seems to be that.

Also, the Senior Minister of State (SMS) for Law, Indranee Rajah, has repeated the same inference in a post on Saturday on her Facebook page.

All this while Singaporeans await the sitting of Parliament on 3 July where PM Lee said he will deliver a ministerial statement on the saga, and ministers say they will also be speaking on the matter.

First, it is disconcerting that the Prime Minister would himself cast such aspersions on Ms Lee, without offering more concrete proof of any wrongdoing. Ditto Ms Indranee, and especially so given she is the SMS for Law. One would have thought she would know better than to offer nothing more than insinuations.

Second, it is worth remembering that the Last Will was made and signed by Lee Kuan Yew 4 years ago.

PM Lee did not raise any questions about the will then, before probate was given by the courts.

It is also worth keeping in mind that PM Lee’s personal lawyer at the time was Lucien Wong, who was later appointed Attorney General in early 2017. It is thus reasonable to say that PM Lee had the best legal advice available to him.

Now, only after 4 years, is PM Lee and his government claiming that there are dubious circumstances surrounding the Last Will’s finalisation.

While the silence by PM Lee and the Government during the 4-year time lapse is questionable, even if consideration is to be given to their concerns, it should be the courts which should be the arbitrator, and not the court of public opinion.

In other words....


https://publichouse.sg/govt-should-take-matter-to-court-and-not-make-insinuations-on-social-media/

Today's papers provided more space to repeat her insinuations first posted on FB last night.
At this rate, who needs a parliament session to know what is going on?
Meantime, the real questions go unanswered.
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
Today's papers provided more space to repeat her insinuations first posted on FB last night.
At this rate, who needs a parliament session to know what is going on?
Meantime, the real questions go unanswered.

Exactly right...the writing is on the wall.

Once again, they just assumed that we are all daft.
 

Victory2016

Alfrescian
Loyal
All are so dishonourable - the son, the ministers, Keling woman, - all drag LKY's legacy through the m&d......LKY should have had the foresight to plan towards his demise but getting rid of these revisionists....
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Exactly right...the writing is on the wall.

Once again, they just assumed that we are all daft.
Can't blame them as the 70% clearly gives them confidence.
Expect more wayang then final decision to preserve and conserve the house.
Unless LHY and LWL camp can come out with more
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Lky are you turning in your grave yet?
That unfilial Son of yours installed by you to inherit your kingdom is now milking all your goodwill to lend legitimacy to his reign.
You abused the law so often now your Son is using it to Deny you your dying wish. Hahaha this is karma indeed.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
IR insinuated there is possible fraud the solution should come from judiciary under these circumstances n not play judge dredd,
Further what legal perspective r they by a committee with 3 members without legal qualifications, we could hv cooks janitors n coffeesoh to make decisions like hell they will make decisions but what ground?
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Lee Hsien Yang
11 hrs ·
SMS Indranee Rajah asks "Why is the government being asked to demolish the house now?" We have never asked the Government to allow us to demolish the house now, only after Wei Ling's departure.
In turn, we ask "Why was a secret committee on the house formed in 2016?" On 13 April 2015, PM Lee stated that since Wei Ling intended to continue living in the house, it was for the "government of the day" to decide.
Beyond the committee's opening letters, the committee was focussed primarily on parroting LHL's attacks on our father's will, and in particular, clause 7. (Just as SMS Indranee does now.) This was clearly an abuse of power by LHL.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Lee Hsien Yang
11 hrs ·
SMS Indranee Rajah asks "Why is the government being asked to demolish the house now?" We have never asked the Government to allow us to demolish the house now, only after Wei Ling's departure.
In turn, we ask "Why was a secret committee on the house formed in 2016?" On 13 April 2015, PM Lee stated that since Wei Ling intended to continue living in the house, it was for the "government of the day" to decide.
Beyond the committee's opening letters, the committee was focussed primarily on parroting LHL's attacks on our father's will, and in particular, clause 7. (Just as SMS Indranee does now.) This was clearly an abuse of power by LHL.


giphy.gif


siao gao bu
 
Top