• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat HOD Teacher Loses Job Because of False Child Molest Allegations! Almost Tio Jailed!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE - A former school teacher was cleared on Wednesday (Sept 20) of three charges under the Children and Young Persons Act.

In acquitting him, the judge said that there was a "real possibility" that the two boys involved had colluded to make false allegations against the accused.

The 40-year-old was accused of committing indecent acts with two boys, aged 13 and 14 then, and getting the younger boy to massage his groin area.


The three charges pertained to alleged offences against the younger boy.

The accused was head of department at a primary school at the time of the alleged offences in 2012.


District Judge John Ng said on Wednesday that the prosecution had not been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had committed the alleged acts against the then 13-year-old.

The boy, the judge said, was unable to provide specific descriptions of the offending acts in relation to any specified occasion.

On the other hand, the judge found the accused's evidence credible and raised doubts in the prosecution's case against him.

"The defence was able to provide indirect but credible evidence which made it unsafe to accept the evidence of (the boy)," he said.

The defence was able to show that the boys had a clear motive to lie, said the judge. Such a motive had likely sprung from the perceived unfair criticism and harsh treatment of the alleged victim by the accused, the judge added.

The accused was initially facing 11 charges.

During the trial, the prosecution proceeded on eight charges against him. The other three charges, involving the then 14-year-old, have been stood down.

In the midst of the trial, the prosecution amended two of the eight charges. It also applied for the accused to be given a discharge not amounting to an acquittal on five charges.

This was granted, leaving the accused with three charges, two of which were amended.

Mr Adrian Wee and Ms Rachel Soh defended the accused.

The maximum punishment under the Children and Young Persons Act is a $10,000 fine and five years' jail.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...nt-acts-with-pupils-after-judge-finds-alleged
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Re: HOD Teacher Loses Job Because of False Child Molest Allegations! Almost Tio Jaile

Wow, teacher's reputation completely ruined and lost job because of these lying kids. Why the AGC even bother to bring this case to court? Fucking stupid prosecutor. Its basically boy's words against the teacher. No evidence, circumstantial or otherwise. In other countries, the AG would be sued by the teacher and made to cough up millions $.
 
Top