• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Fat SPH bitch Selina Lum threaten Sammyboy forumners for online remarks

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
[h=1]Mind what you say online[/h]



[h=2]Selina Lum[/h]
Law Correspondent

In cyberspace, people say things they might not ordinarily say to another person in real life.
The anonymity and invisibility afforded by the Internet remove inhibitions.
Netizens say anything they want because there are no apparent real-world consequences for making throwaway toxic comments on a post or a news item that comes up on their feed or some other forum. After all, the people featured in those posts are just a name or a face on the screen. And who knows if the names and faces offered are real.


Last week, a judge drove home the message that, beyond the thumbs ups and the emoticons, online comments do have a real impact on real people.
In an unusual move, Judicial Commissioner Aedit Abdullah took netizens to task for comments made on online platforms which caused distress to a rape victim in the case before him. He did not specify the nature of the comments, which he said were disrespectful not only to the court process, but also to the victim. Such comments will discourage victims of offences from coming forward, he said.
To be fair, the judge also advised against passing remarks on accused persons, who are deemed innocent until proven guilty.


Everyone has the right to have his day in court, and it is ultimately for the court to hear both sides and weigh the evidence before coming to a decision.
For the ubiquitous netizen, judgment is passed swiftly. Scroll, type, click, close window. Perhaps revel in the upvotes or likes for a savage comment.
For a victim of a serious crime like rape, thoughtless comments made on the fly could be as painful as being assailed again.
The devil's advocate might argue that victims should just save themselves the grief by staying away from online comments. But when flippant remarks become normalised behaviour, adding to the stigma of rape, genuine victims - who may well be more than a name on the screen - may hesitate even further to seek justice.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Definitely JohnTan's wife. Or second wife. Or 100th wife.

I thought this one is JohnTan's wife.

974_1000.jpg
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
My wife still has a great figure like this, unlike the wives of most oppies. Why else do oppies have to visit those hookers instead of banging their own wives?

Womens-Dresses-font-b-Mature-b-font-font-b-Elegant-b-font-Casual-Work-Patchwork-3.jpg
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why is this ugly bitch talking about stigma of rape.
What the fuck would she know anything about rape???
Her cheebye looks like it has never been used.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
[h=1]Mind what you say online[/h]


To be fair, the judge also advised against passing remarks on accused persons, who are deemed innocent until proven guilty.

.

sure got such thing? isnt the then lawless ministar who keep infering his own judgment on various cases?
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Mind what you say online





Selina Lum


Law Correspondent

In cyberspace, people say things they might not ordinarily say to another person in real life.
The anonymity and invisibility afforded by the Internet remove inhibitions.
Netizens say anything they want because there are no apparent real-world consequences for making throwaway toxic comments on a post or a news item that comes up on their feed or some other forum. After all, the people featured in those posts are just a name or a face on the screen. And who knows if the names and faces offered are real.


Last week, a judge drove home the message that, beyond the thumbs ups and the emoticons, online comments do have a real impact on real people.
In an unusual move, Judicial Commissioner Aedit Abdullah took netizens to task for comments made on online platforms which caused distress to a rape victim in the case before him. He did not specify the nature of the comments, which he said were disrespectful not only to the court process, but also to the victim. Such comments will discourage victims of offences from coming forward, he said.
To be fair, the judge also advised against passing remarks on accused persons, who are deemed innocent until proven guilty.


Everyone has the right to have his day in court, and it is ultimately for the court to hear both sides and weigh the evidence before coming to a decision.
For the ubiquitous netizen, judgment is passed swiftly. Scroll, type, click, close window. Perhaps revel in the upvotes or likes for a savage comment.
For a victim of a serious crime like rape, thoughtless comments made on the fly could be as painful as being assailed again.
The devil's advocate might argue that victims should just save themselves the grief by staying away from online comments. But when flippant remarks become normalised behaviour, adding to the stigma of rape, genuine victims - who may well be more than a name on the screen - may hesitate even further to seek justice.

I think this fucking judge fail to understand that the govt probably is the worse offender of this anonymous social media attacks. Look at all the comments by PAP porlumpars against the oppos, and critics in FB and other social media. They must employ thousands of these assholes to anonymously make the oppo look bad.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thats correct. Soreading of propaganda fake news everyday are not lying to the people.

At backdoor got discount in hpl condo flat sales and without internet also got exposed.

With internet today their propaganda fake news are exposed fast and furious, and fully loaded by IB.


I think this fucking judge fail to understand that the govt probably is the worse offender of this anonymous social media attacks. Look at all the comments by PAP porlumpars against the oppos, and critics in FB and other social media. They must employ thousands of these assholes to anonymously make the oppo look bad.
 
Top