• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious NMP Fucks National Youth Council For Copying His Work For Free!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
ST_20170908_XLESSON_3404475.jpg


Drama Box yesterday called out the National Youth Council (NYC) for appropriating the theatre company's forum work, The Lesson, without prior consent and in a manner that "perpetuates prejudices and discriminations".

On Sept 4, the NYC held a public engagement programme in which youth participants, who played the role of members of a community, got to vote on which three out of four families would get an HDB flat in their community, as the group relocated from its current estate.

Some members of the audience later told Drama Box that they were reminded of the theatre company's two-year-old work, The Lesson, restaged here in July.


In The Lesson, the audience pretends to be residents of a township who want a new MRT station. To get it, they must vote on which of seven landmarks, including a marsh and a columbarium, must be destroyed to make way for the station.

On Sept 6, the council sent an e-mail apology to Drama Box, and its chief executive officer David Chua apologised on Facebook for "the disrespect our team has shown for your work (The Lesson) in adapting it for our youth engagement".

He added: "In the excitement to find new ways to connect with our youth, we were too hasty in putting into action what we had learnt and did not consult with Drama Box and its partners. This was not right - please accept our apology."


Drama Box artistic director Kok Heng Leun, who is a Nominated MP representing the arts sector, responded on Facebook, saying he appreciated the apology, but it reflected a "lack of understanding of the issues at hand".

He said "it is either arrogant or ignorant to believe that one can emulate the same idea without appreciating the critical approach The Lesson embodies".

He also called the council's scenario "patronising" as it seemed to prioritise heterosexual family units and imply that alternative families "deserved to be displaced".

Towards the end of his post he concluded: "NYC has appropriated The Lesson and that is why we are upset. The Lesson was meant to create space for dialogue, to understand, to negotiate, to allow everyone a voice, and embrace diversity. What has happened is disrespectful because it went against the fundamental belief of this work, of the artists involved and Drama Box."

Audiences voting on how a play ends is not new - the 1985 musical The Mystery Of Edwin Drood had seven possible endings determined by viewer preference.

As a legal expert told The Straits Times, copyright does not protect ideas, it protects the form that these ideas take, for example, a published script or novel.

However, Mr Kok told The Straits Times: "It's a matter of how you approach engagement. It's easy to see something and be excited and jump on board. When you jump on board without actually understanding it, you do more harm than good."

In response to queries from The Straits Times, the NYC said in an e-mail statement that it "takes a serious view towards intellectual property and copyright issues".

"When NYC realised that we had failed to consult and acknowledge Drama Box in the adaption of The Lesson, we reached out to acknowledge and apologise for our mistake."

"We hope to collaborate with various arts groups to co-curate and co-deliver programmes that can positively impact our young people," it added.

Mr Kok said he is looking forward to discussing this issue with the council.

The Straits Times understands that both parties are arranging a meeting for further dialogue.

"They are trying very hard now and we have to keep open minds," said Mr Kok.

http://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/arts/council-sorry-over-disrespect-for-work
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
What kind of areshole apology is that. Fucking disgrace, collects tax payer funded salary but ends up stealing people's work to earn their pay check. And the idiots actually stole the work of an NMP and to make it even worse, they stole the work of the one of only two renegade NMPs. Clearly they have no idea who is who in Singapore. After Shanmugams unethical conduct involving the Lee siblings, is this even a surprise.
 

KNNBPCB

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
What kind of areshole apology is that. Fucking disgrace, collects tax payer funded salary but ends up stealing people's work to earn their pay check. And the idiots actually stole the work of an NMP and to make it even worse, they stole the work of the one of only two renegade NMPs. After Shanmugams unethical conduct involving the Lee siblings, is this even a surprise.

Terrible behaviour, but based on past examples, he deserves a promotion or a pay rise. :p
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hey JT, can you please stick to your persona, your petticoat is showing. This forum got itself a new lease off since your appearance. :smile:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Hey JT, can you please stick to your persona, your petticoat is showing. This forum got itself a new lease off since your appearance. :smile:

Personally, I think the NYC shouldn't have folded and apologized. If I were in charge, I would have taken that mfcuker to court and wear him down. There's a precedence for this in this patent tussle involving some fat fuck and our good scdf. Given that our legal system here follows past precedence, the NYC would have a very good case and would probably win.
 
Top