• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Commie chinks say you can't be anonymous on sammyboy forum! Wants your real name.

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Papsmearer and scroobal, please use your real names to gain more influence and attract more sinkies to visit this forum.

Real-name system needed for Internet’s development

The Internet real-name authentication management, the so-called real-name system, was implemented several years ago despite the opposing voices of some online activists.

Recently it has been required that Internet users who make online follow-up comments need to go through real-name authentication, which has caused a new wave of discussion. Overseas media outlets have joined the opposition group and claimed that real-name authentication hurts freedom of expression online.

It is true that less online management means more freedom. However, no country can tolerate zero management for the Internet. In fact, real-name authentication has been adopted in more and more countries, and it has been accepted by an increasing number of Chinese people. Nowadays, the Internet has penetrated into people's daily lives. This means real-name authentication is necessary.

Expressing opinions online is a small part of Internet activity. For most people, it does not form a barrier in expressing their opinions if real-name authentication is required.

Real-name authentication does, to some extent, weaken the vitality of online speech. But the influence is usually on those who only temporarily participate in online speech. Those who actively participate in online discussions are unlikely to be affected.

The most influential online opinion leaders have already done real-name authentication. Although they may use other names online, people know who they really are. For them, real names are the basis for gaining influence. People who would feel affected most will be those that express extreme views online, or those who intend to spread rumors online and create disturbances.

When online real-name authentication was first implemented, it was described as real-name usage. The description gives the impression of tightening public opinion. It is true that online public opinion management has been strengthened a lot. However, this kind of strengthening is in line with how China promotes governance according to the rule of law.

China needs an orderly Internet, including an orderly public opinion field on the Internet. Otherwise, the Internet may become a source of turmoil in Chinese society, and it won't have healthy development itself. On the other hand, the robust development of the Internet has to be based on certain degree of freedom.

Neither a disorderly Internet nor a lifeless Internet is in line with the long-term interests of Chinese society. The online public opinion field needs guidance, just as the spirit of the Chinese Constitution does in real life. It cannot become a place full of anti-Constitutional opinion. Moreover, the Internet needs sufficient expression space.

With rapid changes of technology, it is impossible to completely control the Internet. Therefore, that should not be the goal of the Chinese government or the concern of the public. The development and management of the Chinese Internet will be an interactive process of maximizing society's benefits.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
You do not need real name. Just make an allegation and if the government can prove that it is wrong you are immediately discredited and nobody give a hoot who you are and what you subsequently claim or allege.

People who ask for real name are those that are attempting to stifle the internet knowing full well that they have the means and power to shut down genuine dissent and destroy the individual and send a clear message to others who think of coming out and telling what is actually going on.

We are not discussing advances in science or how to make otak otak where there is no reason hide behind a nic.

Even a simple thing of public interest such as a cabinet minister married to an American had to come out from wikileaks. Imagine the country has no clue about the family of a cabinet minister and we entrust our nation in their hands and we had him in the cabinet for yonks.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Imagine the country has no clue about the family of a cabinet minister and we entrust our nation in their hands and we had him in the cabinet for yonks.

Bwahahahahahahaa... Bro, you trying to get their knickers in a knot? They will love the wedgie you know?
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
You do not need real name. Just make an allegation and if the government can prove that it is wrong you are immediately discredited and nobody give a hoot who you are and what you subsequently claim or allege.

People who ask for real name are those that are attempting to stifle the internet knowing full well that they have the means and power to shut down genuine dissent and destroy the individual and send a clear message to others who think of coming out and telling what is actually going on.

We are not discussing advances in science or how to make otak otak where there is no reason hide behind a nic.

Even a simple thing of public interest such as a cabinet minister married to an American had to come out from wikileaks. Imagine the country has no clue about the family of a cabinet minister and we entrust our nation in their hands and we had him in the cabinet for yonks.



Can add come 13 Sept 2017. A Walk Over Presidential Election ?


A Mdm President and a First Gentleman :biggrin:
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
Bwahahahahahahaa... Bro, you trying to get their knickers in a knot? They will love the wedgie you know?



Bwahahahahahahahahaha .....
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2017-08-29-10-44-06_1.jpg
    Screenshot_2017-08-29-10-44-06_1.jpg
    174.7 KB · Views: 499

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
You do not need real name. Just make an allegation and if the government can prove that it is wrong you are immediately discredited and nobody give a hoot who you are and what you subsequently claim or allege.

People who ask for real name are those that are attempting to stifle the internet knowing full well that they have the means and power to shut down genuine dissent and destroy the individual and send a clear message to others who think of coming out and telling what is actually going on.

We are not discussing advances in science or how to make otak otak where there is no reason hide behind a nic.

Even a simple thing of public interest such as a cabinet minister married to an American had to come out from wikileaks. Imagine the country has no clue about the family of a cabinet minister and we entrust our nation in their hands and we had him in the cabinet for yonks.

"Do Good Do Together " -- Bwahahahahaha...
 

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
this is not just wrong english…it is grammatically offensive.

'Do Together' is just plain ungrammatical. The 'do' here is a transitive verb, requiring an object, e.g. 'do it'.

Even if you intended it to be a vulgar slang, you'd still say 'do it together'. Or as the Nike slogan goes, 'Just do it.'

Disgraceful.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't give away the answer too early. Once Halimah and her minders work out that it should be "Do good and do it together" , the World might end.

'Do Together' is just plain ungrammatical. The 'do' here is a transitive verb, requiring an object, e.g. 'do it'.

Even if you intended it to be a vulgar slang, you'd still say 'do it together'. Or as the Nike slogan goes, 'Just do it.'

Disgraceful.
 

yblzh

Alfrescian
Loyal
USA already admitted that their Pentagon and Navy all got hacked by Chinese and caused their fleet in Pacific to be always crashing commercial ships and their sailors died rapidly.

So what is the problem?
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
... Imagine the country has no clue about the family of a cabinet minister and we entrust our nation in their hands and we had him in the cabinet for yonks.
trust dem dat dey ownself check ownself n ownself clear ownself ...
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
'Do Together' is just plain ungrammatical. The 'do' here is a transitive verb, requiring an object, e.g. 'do it'.

Even if you intended it to be a vulgar slang, you'd still say 'do it together'. Or as the Nike slogan goes, 'Just do it.'

Disgraceful.



i worry for Mdm (Pres) and in particular her team assembled. 1st press conference already got so many hiccups.Sad.
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
'Do Together' is just plain ungrammatical. The 'do' here is a transitive verb, requiring an object, e.g. 'do it'.

Even if you intended it to be a vulgar slang, you'd still say 'do it together'. Or as the Nike slogan goes, 'Just do it.'

Disgraceful.




.



 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i worry for Mdm (Pres) and in particular her team assembled. 1st press conference already got so many hiccups.Sad.

Halimah and her minders are so hard up for her to be the next President! Talk of firing the first salvo by holding a press conference and stealing a march on the other 2 yet-to-be certified eligible wannabes. Hope they cock up and continue to misfire all the way till polling day and then lose to either Khan or Marican! That would be sweet sweet poetic justice!
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
'Do Together' is just plain ungrammatical. The 'do' here is a transitive verb, requiring an object, e.g. 'do it'.

Even if you intended it to be a vulgar slang, you'd still say 'do it together'. Or as the Nike slogan goes, 'Just do it.'

Disgraceful.

"do good together" would be better and would save more ink and space.
 
Top