• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat ceo's who quit trump's council

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
they're a bunch of liars and hypocrites themselves. blaming trump for not forcefully denouncing white supremacists on the get go after the charlottesville fallout, they easily fall for fake news and quickly associate white marchers at charlottesville with white supremacy groups. what's wrong with protesting the takedown of robert e. lee's statue? just because black groups are offended by lee's statue the city has to take it down? what do they want? erase history and never mention the civil war again?

when some extreme hate groups from both sides join in the fray to create trouble it does not equate to everyone marching as a white supremacist. there were genuine groups and individuals keen on preserving the general's statue. he was a good general, brilliant in much of the war, won majority of battles, outfought the north most of the time, respected by both north and south, feared by the north, and lived his final years teaching in a local university. before he passed away he kept a low profile during reconstruction and asked his supporters not to erect his statue. in fact, he wanted that part of history erased from american memory. many statues of american leaders including those of the confederacy are still around in public buildings in washington d.c. afterall, these are american leaders whether you like them or not. it's like anti-colonialists in sg heckling the sg parliament to take down the statue of raffles, or remove city hall as it was built by the british for overlording over coolies from china, jagas from punjab, laborers from tamil nadu, and malay plantation workers. again? what's wrong with protesting the removal of statues of historic individuals? given the current political correctness trend, one day washington's statue at wall street will be taken down too....because he was a white founding father who also happened to own black slaves.

and this pussy bunch of politically-correct ceo's are ready to join the fake media and label every lee statue supporter as a supremacist hateful of everyone else. what kind of bs is that? and immediately after the fallout the intel ceo resigned from trump's council and gave a speech about how his company is not bigoted but provides opportunities to minorities to balance and undo the race divide in the tech world. now we know with the report out that his speech was pure political correct bovine scatology. when you look closer at the chart, you'll find that all his claims are bogus. he even conjure the facade by hiding real numbers behind this category of employees called urm - under-represented minorities. wtf? is he going to be so politically correct that the board will allow him to throw the company under the "diversity" bus? no way, intel is competing in a tough and brutal market, and no political correctness and affirmative action will beat the competition and keep the company afloat. they need the best and brightest, and right now 69% of employees are either white and asian males or a shade of the two in between (asian means neh and chinks too). i'm calling him out and i'm gonna shame him with facts.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/intel-apos-diversity-report-shows-205100970.html

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich condemned hate speech and white supremacy on Twitter after the horrifying events in Charlottesville this weekend. On Monday, he resigned from Trump's American Manufacturing Council to "call attention to the serious harm our divided political climate is causing to critical issues..." Now, alongside a mid-year diversity report that documents some slow and flat growth in diversity at Intel, Krzanich is touting his company's "fast march" toward the full representation of women and unrepresented minorities in Intel's US-based workforce by 2018. That's only one year away.

In the blog post, Krzanich says that Intel is two years ahead of the original plan, which aimed to create a diverse, inclusive workforce. "We set out to achieve by 2020 an inclusive workforce that reflects the diversity we see every day in the world around us," he writes. "Doing this would bring the number of female, Hispanic, African-American and Native American employees in Intel's 50,000-strong U.S. workforce to full representation." The new goal, he says, is now moved up to 2018.

The mid-year report states that the five-year plan is on track to equally represent women, African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans in both technical and non-technical jobs. "In December of 2014, our gap to full representation was 2,300 employees. Today that gap has narrowed to 801 people – a 65 percent improvement."

IMG_0084.JPG

While it's nice to see a move toward a more diverse Intel workforce, it's hard to not feel discouraged with such a slow rate of growth over the past three years. White men are at the top of every chart in Intel's 2017 diversity report. With only a 0.3 percent growth in female employees across all sectors of the company (and a flat rate of growth for African Americans, Hispanics and Native Americans), how can Krzanich say his company will be on track in just one more year? By defining "full representation" as a function of "market availability."

Intel defines full representation as the full market availability of women and underrepresented minorities, which means that it bypasses any actual efforts to create more space for diverse people in the workforce in the first place. The company has updated the way it measures market availability, which tracks how many skilled workers exist in both the US labor market as well as within Intel's own employee base, but it hasn't been updated since 2014.

As with the rest of the tech industry, Intel says that white and Asian males continue to represent more than 90 percent of mid- to senior-level technical roles. Intel is also having a hard time retaining minorities, too, though it has added "diversity playbooks" and other programs to help (predominantly white) managers hire and retain workers. Intel claims it's on track to train all of its more than 13,000 managers by the end of the first quarter in 2018, but is that enough? If nothing else, the company should be looking to programs to increase the market availability of the women and other underrepresented minorities in the first place.
 
Last edited:

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
As leaders of industry these CEOs have to be seen to be doing the right thing.

They are feeling pressure from employees & the public to disassociate their companies from Trump. Some groups have also threatened to boycott their products.

These CEOs are hard nosed businessmen, why should they stick their heads out for Trump? Trump has shown no loyalty to his supporters & often thrown them under the bus.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
As leaders of industry these CEOs have to be seen to be doing the right thing.

They are feeling pressure from employees & the public to disassociate their companies from Trump. Some groups have also threatened to boycott their products.

These CEOs are hard nosed businessmen, why should they stick their heads out for Trump? Trump has shown no loyalty to his supporters & often thrown them under the bus.

for consumer products and services that are sold to the general public, companies have to pander to the crowd, basically everybody. for some custom made products that are specifically targeted at a small demographic, e.g. rednecks with their duck hunting attires or white guys who love their custom made bikes, those (usually privately run) companies don't care about political correctness.

intel is in the component business, not directly involved with the consumer segment, i.e. they don't deal with consumers directly. their chips are in pc's, laptops, notebooks, and now smartphones. a nigger who protests in the streets with a blm banner has no clue what's in his iphone. all he cares about is his fb and instagram content on his iphone, plus the usual loud rap music that he plays on the subway to every other passenger's chagrin. apple will have to care not to offend this segment, but intel doesn't need to. yet, to be politically correct this intel ceo jumps on the diversity bandwagon and boasts about his company hiring minorities by the bushels as though other tech companies are not doing likewise. but if you look into the facts, charts and details, it's bs and he may as well admit it as tokenism. he's using token numbers to trick the public (in fact the percentage declined year on year), and most of these so called urm's are in clerical and chobolan positions rather than engineering ones. if he's truthful about the numbers, he would admit that over 69% of his tech workforce are white, neh, tiong males while the urm's are relegated to cafeteria, custodial, and clerical duties. he can mask all the bs numbers he wants, but i've been to intel and dealt with intel workers, and i can see with my own eyes.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I didn't make the rules lah. If you are CEO you represent a brand, people look up to you & expect you to behave properly. That's why brands terminate their sponsorship with sportsman who get into trouble e.g. Tiger Woods

As president Trump he is expected to behave presidentially which he is not.

Even LKY knew this & that is why he told his MPs not show off their wealth because it's not cool.
Maybe Trump is ignorant because his father was a member of the KKK & this influenced Trump's attitude.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I didn't make the rules lah. If you are CEO you represent a brand, people look up to you & expect you to behave properly. That's why brands terminate their sponsorship with sportsman who get into trouble e.g. Tiger Woods

As president Trump he is expected to behave presidentially which he is not.

Even LKY knew this & that is why he told his MPs not show off their wealth because it's not cool.
Maybe Trump is ignorant because his father was a member of the KKK & this influenced Trump's attitude.

what's the meaning of "presidential" and "presidentially"? this modern term is coined by the mainstream media and jiakliaobee political pundits in washington d.c. when teddy roosevelt was president he was never "presidential". he was saying things today's folks would cringe. same with george washington, thomas jefferson, andrew jackson, franklin roosevelt. in fact, fdr was neither politically correct nor guarded in his words. during ww2, he tasked his propaganda machinery to put out a poster to distinguish hated japs from friendly chinks. the poster described how jap eyes were slantier than chinks, shorter, noses sharper, evil, backstabbing, cunning and cruel while chinks were harmless, innocent, weak, and loyal. the poster was to help americans not to miss-identify chinks as japs to prevent public lynching of the wrong ethnic group. but for american japs, they could be lynched and incarcerated in concentration camps.

times have changed, and by "presidential" it actually means "great! you won the white house, congrats and now just shut up, smile, behave like a wax exhibit, and recite according to what hollywood scripts tell you to do in a ceremony so as not to roil other cuntries' sensitivities and those of (insecure and highly violatile) minorities." that's the modern day meaning of "presidential".
 
Last edited:

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what's the meaning of "presidential" and "presidentially"? this modern term is coined by the mainstream media and jiakliaobee political pundits in washington d.c. when teddy roosevelt was president he was never "presidential". he was saying things today's folks would cringe. .....


Easier to understand what is not acting presidential & acting like what Trump did. Trump was trying to argue his point of view & refused to concede that others may not agree with him.

As president he should be trying to diffuse the situation & not fanning the fires. As the mother of the girl who died in Charlottesville said Trump should “Think before you speak,”
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Easier to understand what is not acting presidential & acting like what Trump did. Trump was trying to argue his point of view & refused to concede that others may not agree with him.

As president he should be trying to diffuse the situation & not fanning the fires. As the mother of the girl who died in Charlottesville said Trump should “Think before you speak,”

i like this kind of abrasive culture shock. we need an arsehole in the white house, not goodie two shoes.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Which statues were involved in the opium trade and started 2 opium trade wars w China. Get it pulled down too. Knn.

Time to clean up US white supremist criminal biz past and not hide and change their criminal history to Saint hood history. Teach the right history in schools but not lied to US decendants.

Civil wars or wars w other countries using criminal biz trades are worst history, the US descendant has to decide and weigh the merit.

In Singapore white Raffles created Singapore to established military base to prepared invasion of China and alos blocked and bomb any Chinese gunboats passin through SEA heading to UK and Europe. Or even bomb Chinese Budhha boats loaded w China opium heading to Europe to start the Yellow Peril.

Go bring down Rafflles statue and cut the bs he established Singapore was on goodwill to trade w China based on clean non criminal biz trade. It was estsblished for criminal drug trade and war with China or any Asian countries and invasion of Asia.

Time has come Sinkie for u to change Singapore history and put LKY statue replace drug traficker Raffles white supremist drug lord.

Lky did more good, and no criminal biz trade w the West, and bring no shame to overseas Chinese history in Singapore than the white supremist BE Raffles.

No dogs and Chinese allowed to enter Angmoh pubs and establishments becos shameful drug traffickers cannot mixed w opium addicts Chinese by orde of the BE queen, even if they wanted to.

Raffles brought shame BE in to SEA history as the biggest monopoly drug trafficker in Singapore Labuan and Straits Settlement in Malaysia.

Angmoh ji pai tua kee 这次大事 victim people are diiging out their past history time to clean up their dirty closets.
 
Last edited:

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Chinese shd also start to bring down Bell Corporation, Princeton and Columbia unis and many more US elite biz built tgeircwealth using opium money at the expense of China.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
When a country is bankrupt they start stir shit to create wars and crisis to themselves so as not to pay back their IOU loan debts.

Expect more troubles to come in US soil ownself bully ownself to avoid pay debts.

This is the work of Rothschild?

Better sell off yr US captial asset now. Expect more capital flight out of US soon and moving thier $$ to China soil with their MIUS made in US crisis.

And ownself moved ownself capital flight out of US to avoid pay back IOU loan debts.

HUAT AH.....
 
Last edited:
Top