• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious PLA new advanced warship passing NATO water with superority & advantages

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Now Ang Moh saw with their own eyes, the PLA got better warships missiles and radars, vs the Ang Moh beggars' Junk Karunguni boats.


http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2017-07-24/doc-ifyihrit1261906.shtml


英媒谈英国军舰监视中国赴欧战舰:二者一比好尴尬

2017年07月24日 08:38 环球网
//d0.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/13/a248c852699e4cf2ac696a0c28c482a3.jpg
//d8.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/14/f9945226b7594e3a8266749493bffbbc.jpg
//d1.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/05/d8a49c792b5c474fb087a14166d619f3.jpg
新浪扶翼 行业专区
//d4.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/24/0c466cb156574718b633eeb1295597d7.jpg

  [环球时报综合报道]中俄“海上联合-2017”演习23日进入第二天,双方开展图上推演方案。此次演习虽为年度例行,却仍在北约和西方国家引发了种种焦虑。一些媒体和网民不停地追问为何中国舰队要不远万里赴波罗的海军演,或惊讶中国海军壮大速度惊人,或认为中俄军演就是向北约“展示肌肉”,英国、荷兰、丹麦等国还派出战舰一路跟踪。

  这次演习受到北约的密切关注。英国广播公司(BBC)22日称,3艘中国军舰已进入波罗的海,曾经是苏联领土的波罗的海三国对此次中俄军演高度警惕,北约对普京的真实意图感到担心。

  英国《每日电讯报》22日称,中俄军演的目标是北约,观察人士强调中国“渴望成为海上强国”,此次中国在波罗的海与俄罗斯联合军演,“也是对美国、印度和日本不久前在印度洋联合演习的回敬”。

  美国《星条旗报》21日引述美国欧洲司令部的声明说:“我们在密切关注俄罗斯与其他参与国的演习,比如中国。我们支持他们在国际海域训练的权利,但我们希望各国遵守国际规则和法律。”

  美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)22日称,中国派军舰参加波罗的海军演,北约国家看在眼里。选择波罗的海作为军演地点意义很大。那里依然是俄罗斯与美国及其盟友之间关系高度紧张的源头之一。中国来到这片海域,发出的信号是,“希望与上述国家平起平坐”。英国《太阳报》认为,中俄军演将进一步给北约施加压力。中国与美国在朝鲜和南海问题上关系紧张,俄罗斯因为叙利亚问题与美国发生冲突。

  此前,当中国海军编队通过英吉利海峡时,英国皇家海军紧急派出“里士满”号护卫舰跟踪。此举引起英国网友激烈反应。网友“桑普森”在英国《太阳报》相关报道下留言,对该国海军力量不足表示不满:“我们需要在家门口展示海军力量的时候,军舰去哪里了?或许丹麦可以接济我们。节俭可真为我们国家做了贡献。”来自英国利兹市的一名网友说,“皇家海军服役24年之久的护卫舰监视中国现代战舰,好尴尬啊。”还有英国网友称,通过英吉利海峡的中国军舰可以和任何英国军舰媲美,而且他们的反舰导弹是一流的,“中国正给北约和特朗普发去明确信息”。

  据《瑞典晚报》报道,在中俄联合军演前夕,瑞典国防大臣胡尔特奎斯特说,这是中俄第一次在波罗的海联合演习,“希望这次军演开放度和透明度都很高”。瑞典国防部表示会在瑞典边界附近密切关注这次军演,“但我们会采取怎样的对应不会公开”。芬兰《赫尔辛基日报》称,中国参加这次军演是不了解这个地区有多紧张。报道称,波罗的海国家都希望和中国政府保持良好的外交合作关系。“中国是波罗的海国家的朋友,中国没有完全了解俄罗斯对波罗的海国家的军事威胁和不断制造的紧张局势!” 还有瑞典网民在推特上抱怨,“俄罗斯第二大城市在波罗的海边上,所以在这儿军演不奇怪,但中国和波罗的海不应该有任何关系”,等等。
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM TOO!

Ang Moh swallowed their own poison from PRC, 卵葩揸住! 发啊!


http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2017-07-24/doc-ifyihrmf3262580.shtml

我军回应穿越英吉利海峡及监视美军演:享有航行自由

2017年07月24日 10:39 新华网
//d8.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/13/1a3e726f8ce64732bb8adbc927995920.jpg
//d4.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/24/0c466cb156574718b633eeb1295597d7.jpg
//d4.sina.com.cn/pfpghc2/201707/05/4279700918f343719c2c9d6c1f9f0162.jpg
新浪扶翼 行业专区

  国务院新闻办公室定于2017年7月24日上午10时在国务院新闻办新闻发布厅举行新闻发布会,请军委办公厅军委法制局副局长陆玉大校,军委联合参谋部作战局副局长周尚平少将,军委政治工作部办公厅副主任张成文大校,国防部新闻局副局长、新闻发言人吴谦大校介绍中国人民解放军建设发展有关情况,并答记者问。

  CNN记者:上周末,中国军舰出现在澳大利亚昆士兰附近水域,被认为是在监测澳大利亚和美国正在进行的联合军演。当地官员表示,这个举动是不友好的挑衅行为。在这之前,我们也注意到中国海军军舰穿越英吉利海峡,与俄罗斯军队举行军演。此外,在美国进行“萨德”反导系统测试时,有中国军舰出现在美国阿拉斯加附近水域。中方这一系列比较高调的动作,是出于什么样的考量?是向国际社会释放出一种什么样的信号?这是中国军队建设“蓝水海军”过程中,国际社会要接受的一种新常态吗?谢谢。

  吴谦:我先说一点,我认为中国军队的行动谈不上什么高调。正如我刚才所讲到的,中国军队积极扩大军事交往,广泛参与国际维和、远海护航和人道主义救援减灾等行动,这体现了大国军队的良好形象和责任担当。我还想强调一点,在非领海海域,中国军队舰机和其他国家舰机一样,都享有航行自由的权利。谢谢。

红毛狗仔,丢你老母!
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1057697.shtml


Oz media fusses over China’s freedom of navigation trip
Source:Global Times Published: 2017/7/24 0:18:39
Australian media reported that a Chinese spy ship was detected in the waters off Queensland where the joint military drill Talisman Sabre between the US, New Zealand and Australia was being held.

The Australian Defense Force said in a statement that "the Chinese ship remained outside Australian territorial waters, but was inside the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone in the Coral Sea. The vessel's presence has not detracted from the exercise objectives. Australia respects the rights of all states to exercise freedom of navigation in international waters in accordance with international law."

However, Australian media were shrill on the issue, claiming the navigation by the Chinese spy ship was "aggressive" and "worrying." While staunchly supporting US "freedom of navigation (FON)" operations in the South China Sea, Australian media outlets are startled at, and are unwilling to accept, the "sudden" appearance of the Chinese spy ship in their adjacent waters. European public opinion also felt unease as Chinese warships steamed through the English Channel and entered into the Baltic Sea for joint military drills with Russia. A sense of vigilance has arisen spontaneously among NATO countries.

While the US and its allies always conduct joint patrols unilaterally in the South China Sea, China's naval vessels and spy ships have now started to appear in the waters significant to the West. Obviously, this is just a beginning of China's future operations.

This shift will provide both sides more perspectives from which to view FON operations. For instance, Australians may gradually realize the seriousness of the South China Sea issue and thus understand Chinese vigilance, and Chinese may become more confident in face of US patrols and provocations.

There's an essential difference between a Chinese spy ship's low-key presence in Australia's adjacent waters and US warships sailing within 12 nautical miles of China's Nansha and Xisha islands. China-Russia joint drills in the Baltic Sea have brought about different military effects from US drills in the South China Sea as well. Reactions by the Australian and European public were surprising to Chinese.

This teaches China that patrolling in Western waters may be an ideal response to Western interventions in the South China Sea issue. China should speed up the construction of its blue water navy.

In mid July, American media reported that a Chinese spy ship sailed within 100 miles of Alaska to witness the recent test of a THAAD anti-ballistic missile system. The Pentagon is suspected to have used the news as excuse to raise its budget. In the future, Chinese warships should be able to go to waters off Guam, Hawaii, the Caribbean Sea, or even to the San Diego base on the US West Coast. Such trips will be much more useful than only condemning US warships flexing their muscles in the South China Sea.

While China remains strategically moderate and has no intention to pursue maritime hegemony, it will not allow an aggressive US and its allies to push the frontline of their geopolitical machinations further into our court.

China will build more warships and meanwhile make full use of them. The PLA Navy has a mission to safeguard China's national security. Now it is time to explore new ways to carry out such a mission.

Posted in: EDITORIAL
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

It's obvious the ah tiongs r spying..if they talk about freedom of navigation..than also applies to the yanks in SCS
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

It's obvious the ah tiongs r spying..if they talk about freedom of navigation..than also applies to the yanks in SCS

Idiot Beggars US stir shit in SCS calling it Navigational Freedom, so now PLA forced the Ang Moh to eat their own poison, stick the same lame excuse up their white ass. The Ang Moh now Lan Lan.



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-military-idUSKBN1A91QE

Chinese jets intercept U.S. surveillance plane: U.S. officials

Idrees Ali

3 Min Read
FILE PHOTO: A U.S. Navy EP-3E Aries signals reconnaissance aircraft, escorted by an EA-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft, performs a flyby over aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman in the Arabian Gulf April 24, 2016. U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Bobby J Siens/Handout/File Photo via REUTERS

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two Chinese fighter jets intercepted a U.S. Navy surveillance plane over the East China Sea at the weekend, with one jet coming within about 300 feet (91 meters) of the American aircraft, U.S. officials said on Monday.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said initial reports showed one of the Chinese J-10 aircraft came close enough to the U.S. EP-3 plane on Sunday to cause the American aircraft to change direction.

One of the officials said the Chinese jet was armed and that the interception happened 80 nautical miles (148 km) from the Chinese city of Qingdao.

The Pentagon said that the encounter between the aircraft was unsafe, but added that the vast majority of interactions were safe.

Incidents such as Sunday's intercept are relatively common.

In May, two Chinese SU-30 aircraft intercepted a U.S. aircraft designed to detect radiation while it was flying in international air space over the East China Sea.

China closely monitors any U.S. military activity around its coastline.
FILE PHOTO: A U.S. Navy EP-3E Aries aircraft is directed by ground crew after a flight from Bahrain September 25, 2017. U.S. Air Force/Staff Sgt. Rhiannon Willard/Handout/File photo via REUTERS

In 2001, an intercept of a U.S. spy plane by a Chinese fighter jet resulted in a collision that killed the Chinese pilot and forced the American plane to make an emergency landing at a base on Hainan.

The 24 U.S. air crew members were held for 11 days until Washington apologized for the incident. That encounter soured U.S.-Chinese relations in the early days of President George W. Bush's first term in office.

Separately, the Pentagon said the U.S. military would soon carry out another test of it's Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system.

"These tests are done as a routine measure to ensure that the system is ready and... they are scheduled well in advance of any other real world geopolitical events going on," Pentagon spokesman Captain Jeff Davis told reporters.

The director of the Missile Defense Agency, Lieutenant General Sam Greaves, said in a statement that a test would be carried out at the Pacific Spaceport Complex in Alaska.

Last month the United States shot down a simulated, incoming intermediate-range ballistic missile similar to the ones being developed by countries like North Korea, in a test of the nation's THAAD missile defenses.

The United States deployed THAAD to South Korea this year to guard against North Korea's shorter-range missiles. That has drawn fierce criticism from China, which says the system's powerful radar can probe deep into its territory.



r
 

yellowarse

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

It's obvious the ah tiongs r spying..if they talk about freedom of navigation..than also applies to the yanks in SCS

It's geopolitical tit-for-tat. You sail in my waters claiming FON, I'll do the same in yours using FON. How else to make the US see that their actions are belligerent and bordering on an act of war?

And, of course, the double standard by Australia is telling.

Territorial disputes aside, FON operations using battleships and destroyers are essentially hostile operations meant to project a show of power to non-allied powers. It has nothing to do with 'freedom' of navigation at all.

Ultimately, in big power politics, there's no objective notion of good and evil. Might is right, and power comes from the barrel of a gun.
 
Last edited:

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

If the Chinks are not careful the almighty USA will bomb them out of existence.
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

If the Chinks are not careful the almighty USA will bomb them out of existence.

sure or not ?
USAss can't even handle a bunch of inferiorly armed groups in the ME leh.

if the Chinks are overly careful
not only wuld they end up being a nation of submissive people forever,
other countries wuld suffered the same fate too.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Beggar USA already given up leading role to China. But china wants their blood in their hand first revenge US angmoh of the past humilating opium wars with China.



If the Chinks are not careful the almighty USA will bomb them out of existence.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
kitchens on tiong whoreships are still equipped with 6.9 hundred year old wok with 6.9 feet in diameter to cook everything from flied lice to river pork soup. where got advanced?
 

PAP_Junta

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

If the Chinks are not careful the almighty USA will bomb them out of existence.

If not for China buying time for USA's ass to stay in one single piece, USA had already been used by Kim NK to test ICBM nuke like a FOC test target. Even NK the USA can not handle. Do not dream to handle China nor Russia. The USA is a useless piece of shit today.
 

Semaj2357

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
kitchens on tiong whoreships are still equipped with 6.9 hundred year old wok with 6.9 feet in diameter to cook everything from flied lice to river pork soup. where got advanced?
and marine fuel with 96.9% tar content can be used for bbq charsiew / suckling pig - tastier than gutter oil :wink:
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

If the Chinks are not careful the almighty USA will bomb them out of existence.

Sure or not? USA dare not even bomb North Korea. Methinks China has more bombs than the USA!:biggrin:
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: PRC replied to Ang Moh on Chinese instrusion spy & passage = NAVIGATION FREEDOM T

Go China!!! Go go go China

Hooo hoo hoo!!
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If I were in charge of the white man's military, I would have ordered radar-lock on the chink vessel and opened fire upon it. The chinks need to be taught a lesson.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
If I were in charge of the white man's military, I would have ordered radar-lock on the chink vessel and opened fire upon it. The chinks need to be taught a lesson.

White men already lost everything, including electronic warfare. Chinese can jam western radar easily. Chinese use Quantum Radar can not be jammed. White men are unable to catch up at all.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
........................
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2017-07-27 16:34:43.jpg
    IMG_2017-07-27 16:34:43.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 217
Top