• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Ah-Neh-Land says they are stronger than 1962, want to try another war with PRC!

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/arun-jaitley-china-bhutan-defence-ministry-1962-war/1/990982.html


China trying to alter territories, India different from 1962: Defence Minister Arun Jaitley

Defence Minister Arun Jaitley today said Bhutan has appropriately pointed out that China was trying to usurp its land, and that India is not entering into any other country's land.
IndiaToday.in | Written by Prabhash K Dutta
[email protected]
New Delhi, June 30, 2017 | UPDATED 18:55 IST
A +A -
Highlights

1
China said India should recall the 1962 war and learn a lesson
2
Jaitley said China is trying to encroach on Bhutan's land
3
India is not entering into any other country's land: Jaitley

Defence Minister Arun Jaitley today brushed aside China's warning about the ongoing face-off along Bhutan border.

Asking India to withdraw troops from Bhutan border areas, China said that India should recall the 1962 war and learn a lesson.

Responding to the remarks made by the Chinese foreign ministry, Arun Jaitley said, "India of 2017 is different from India of 1962. Those were different situations."

Jaitley said China is trying to encroach on Bhutan's land. He said, "Statements issued by Bhutan make it clear that this is the land of Bhutan. It is located near India's land. There is an arrangement between India and Bhutan for giving protection in the border region."

Jaitley further said that Bhutan has appropriately pointed out that China was trying to usurp its land. India is not entering into any other country's land what China is doing, Jaitley said.

Earlier, Bhutan issued a demarche to China yesterday over the construction of a road towards its Army camp in Zomplri area of Doklam and asked Beijing to restore status quo by stopping the work immediately.

The demarche by Bhutan comes at a time when there is an ongoing face-off between Indian and Chinese troops in the Doklam (also known as Donglang) area of the Sikkim sector.

Doklam is a disputed territory and Bhutan has a written agreement with China that pending the final resolution of the boundary issue, peace and tranquillity should be maintained in the area.

This came after China accused India of having a "hidden agenda" in the current military stand-off with it in the Sikkim sector where Beijing has a territorial dispute with Bhutan.

MEA'S REBUTTAL

The Ministry of External Affairs has issued a point-by-point rebuttal. Here's the full text.

"The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs made a statement on 26 June 2017 alleging that Indian border troops crossed the boundary line in the Sikkim sector of the China-India boundary and entered Chinese territory. This has been reiterated since then in other Chinese official briefings.

2.The facts of the matter are as follows:

i. On 16 June, a PLA construction party entered the Doklam area and attempted to construct a road. It is our understanding that a Royal Bhutan Army patrol attempted to dissuade them from this unilateral activity. The Ambassador of the Royal Government of Bhutan (RGOB) has publicly stated that it lodged a protest with the Chinese Government through their Embassy in New Delhi on 20 June.

ii. Yesterday, the Foreign Ministry of Bhutan has also issued a statement underlining that the construction of the road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the 1988 and 1998 agreements between Bhutan and China and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between these two countries. They have urged a return to the status quo as before 16 June 2017.

iii. In keeping with their tradition of maintaining close consultation on matters of mutual interest, RGOB and the Government of India have been in continuous contact through the unfolding of these developments.

iv. In coordination with the RGOB, Indian personnel, who were present at general area Doka La, approached the Chinese construction party and urged them to desist from changing the status quo. These efforts continue.

v. The matter has been under discussion between India and China at the diplomatic level in the Foreign Ministries since then, both in New Delhi and Beijing. It was also the subject of a Border Personnel Meeting at Nathu La on 20 June.

3. India is deeply concerned at the recent Chinese actions and has conveyed to the Chinese Government that such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India.

4. In this context, the Indian side has underlined that the two Governments had in 2012 reached agreement that the tri-junction boundary points between India, China and third countries will be finalized in consultation with the concerned countries. Any attempt, therefore, to unilaterally determine tri-junction points is in violation of this understanding.

5. Where the boundary in the Sikkim sector is concerned, India and China had reached an understanding also in 2012 reconfirming their mutual agreement on the "basis of the alignment". Further discussions regarding finalization of the boundary have been taking place under the Special Representatives framework.

6. It is essential that all parties concerned display utmost restraint and abide by their respective bilateral understandings not to change the status quo unilaterally. It is also important that the consensus reached between India and China through the Special Representatives process is scrupulously respected by both sides.

7. India has consistently taken a positive approach to the settlement of its own boundary with China, along with the associated issue of the tri-junctions.

8. India cherishes peace and tranquillity in the India-China border areas. It has not come easily. Both sides have worked hard to establish institutional framework to discuss all issues to ensure peace and tranquillity in the India-China border areas. India is committed to working with China to find peaceful resolution of all issues in the border areas through dialogue.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.risingkashmir.com/news/india-of-2017-different-from-1962-india-to-china


India of 2017 different from 1962: India to China
Published at July 01, 2017 08:17 AM 0Comment(s)4294views
Tweet


India of 2017 different from 1962: India to China
Press Trust of India
New Delhi

India today hit back at China for making veiled threats with Defence Minister Arun Jaitely asserting that India of 2017 is different from what it was in 1962, even as New Delhi told Beijing its actions near Sikkim have "serious" security implications for this country.

A day after China's oblique reference to the war the two countries had fought 55 years ago, the defence minister also said the current standoff between Indian and Chinese troops was triggered by Beijing.

Expressing deep concern over China constructing a road in the disputed Doklam area near Sikkim, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said it was essential that all parties concerned display utmost restraint and abide by their respective bilateral understandings not to change the status quo unilaterally.

India's reaction follows a face-off between Indian and Chinese troops in the area, prompting Beijing to take a tough stance and demand withdrawal of Indian troops from the Sikkim sector as a precondition for "meaningful dialogue" to resolve the situation.

"India is deeply concerned at the recent Chinese actions and has conveyed to the Chinese government that such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India," the MEA asserted in a press release.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...ya-sabha-mp/story-h40SCFN76ORNTHzjqFPJ4K.html



India needs ‘full time’ defence minister because of China, Pakistan threats: Rajya Sabha MP

“The threats given by China and the killings of our soldiers on the border with Pakistan demand that India should have a full time defence minister,” the Congress leader said.
india Updated: Jul 02, 2017 08:30 IST
Press Trust of India, Panaji
Defence ministry
Defence minister Arun Jaitley with GOC of Baramulla based Division, Maj Gen RP Kalita during a visit to the forward areas of Rampur Sector of North Kashmi, in this file photo from May 19.(PTI)

Goa’s lone Rajya Sabha MP Shantaram Naik said on Saturday that India needs a “full time” defence minister considering the threat perception to the nation from the neighbouring countries.

“The threats given by China and the killings of our soldiers on the border with Pakistan demand that India should have a full time defence minister,” the Congress leader said.

“Chinese threat is looming large along the Sino-India border. Indians have been denied permission to visit the Kailash Mansarovar (through Nathu La). China is reminding us of the 1962 war,” he said in an e-mail to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley took additional charge of the defence ministry in March after incumbent defence minister Manohar Parrikar stepped down to go back to Goa as chief minister.

“The absence of a full time defence minister, with one bureaucrat, Ajit Doval (the National Security Advisor), running the defence ministry, has further encouraged the Chinese to believe that India cannot do anything beyond empty rhetoric,” he alleged.

Naik also criticised the GST rollout celebrations saying, “Your (the Centre’s) focus in celebrating the GST regime and fooling the people, just as the government did during demonetisation, will not help the nation.”
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2017-07-02/doc-ifyhrxtp6427615.shtml



印度国防部长回应中方警告:现在印度已不是1962年了

2017年07月02日 08:17 中国网
//d1.sina.com.cn/201604/01/1414092.JPG
//d1.sina.com.cn/201604/01/1414092.JPG
新浪扶翼 行业专区

  原标题:面对中国军方有深意的警告,印防长的回应让印网友兴奋了

  据《印度斯坦时报》6月30日报道,针对中国近日提及1962年战争,要求印度从历史中吸取教训,印度国防部长Arun Jaitley 周五公开表示,2017年的印度已经和1962年的印度不一样了。

  中印军队近日在两国边界锡金段中方一侧发生人员对峙,印度军队越过了从未成为争议的这段边界,并且向印媒散发倒打一耙的消息,宣称中国军队越界在印度领土上施工。

  对此,中国外交部发言人陆慷29日表示:这次事件的真相是,印度边防部队人员非法越过了中印边界锡金段进入了中国境内。真相是难以持续掩盖的。我们再次要求印方遵守历史界约规定,尊重中国的领土主权,立即将越界部队撤回到边界线的印方一侧,避免事态越演越烈,陷于更大的被动。

  另据印度媒体此前报道,印陆军参谋长拉瓦特称,印度在为“2.5线战争”做准备,就是应对中国、巴基斯坦和国内的安全威胁。

  对此,国防部新闻发言人吴谦29日表示:印度陆军参谋长的言论是极其不负责任的。我们希望印军个别人能够汲取历史教训,停止发表这种叫嚣战争的危险言论。

  30日,印度国防部长Arun Jaitley 声称:目前的对峙是由中方引发的,而且不丹声称争议地区属于不丹,“不丹政府昨日发表声明,明确表示,争议地区属于不丹,它位于印度附近,根据印度和不丹协议,印方应确保此地安全”。

  针对中方“希望印度能汲取历史教训,停止叫嚣战争”的警告,Arun Jaitley 表示:“如果他们试图提醒我们,2017年的印度已经和1962年的印度不一样了”。

  Arun Jaitley还声称,中国正在试图改变现状,认为我们来到争议地区想要抢占别国领土,这种想法绝对是错误的。

Ah-Neh netizens crying for war already! Missiles pse! Make Prata Ripped Again! 1962 was a small lesson 2017 must bleed with limbs dismembered! Eyeballs gouged out!

  对此,有印度网友表示:

  要打起来了!

  说得好。中国闭嘴吧。

  采取强硬立场,继续前进!!

  我们终于为自己战斗了,为这一天骄傲。

  希望中国参与了边境活动的指挥官、将领和领导都受到神的惩罚,因为他们错误的愿望和白日梦。
标签: 印度领土不
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
in 1962 PRC not yet got nuke, only very poor old styled conventional weapons, and they whacked Ah Neh badly, captured all the survivors who surrendered.

Chinese captured all the lands in disputed, Indians abandoned their injured and fled, but they were captured by Chinese in WHOLE BRIGADE unit include a Brigade Commander. Indian unit surrendered. Indian KIA 4885 Injured 1047, Chinese KIA 722, injured 697. One Indian Brigade Commander killed, one POW, (Indian had 11 brigades in that war 26000 strong, mostly fled)

Indian army abandoned countless amount of weapons, ammos, vehicles, equipments etc, all captured by Chinese.


many war photos pse click:
http://wap.eastday.com/node2/node3/n403/u1ai605295_t72.html



揭秘中印军队的巨大差距,战俘比例高达2:4000
2016-05-09 17:34 来源:科罗廖夫

  1962年的对印自卫反击战,是新中国为取得新疆、西藏以及西南地区的持久稳定和平,精心策划和庙算的一次有准备有组织的反击战争。中印战争最实质目的,是为了解决西藏问题,是为了彻底消除印度从英国继承过来的,对整个西藏的特权和影响力,这个才是最关键,印度直至50年代还在西藏留有驻军,享有免税等一系列特权。

  在1962年10月之前,不知马王爷几只眼的印军十分嚣张,不断蚕食我领土,经常挑衅我边防部队,欺压驱赶我边民,蓄意制造流血事件。实际上自1951年印军在边境采取咄咄逼人之势以来,中国政府和军队是一忍再忍,甚至主动后撤。印军却认为我军好欺负,反而自1959年8月起变本加厉地向中国边境地区采取攻势,公然袭击我军边防巡逻队和边境哨卡,打死打伤我边防官兵多人,越过实际控制线修建大量入侵据点,一时边境局势急剧恶化。

  为此,毛泽东以战略眼光决定“以战止战”,期望打一场有限战争能争取30年的边境安宁。1962年10月20日,中印边境自卫反击战全面打响,中国人解放军以摧朽拉枯之势向印军发起全线反击。当时战区一线有印军11个旅26000多人,被解放军横扫如秋叶,打得屁滚尿流,抱头鼠窜。连我前线指挥员、身经百战的西藏军区张国华司令员都说:参加革命33年,从没有打过这么痛快的仗。此战我军打出了国威军威,狠狠教训了不知天高地厚的印军。要不是我军主动停火、后撤,恐印军的精锐主力将被悉数全歼。

  此战,我军牺牲722人,负伤697人;击毙印军第62旅旅长霍希尔·辛格准将以下4885人,击伤1047人。两军阵亡比为1:6.8。更惊人的是我 军参战数万余人,当时统计竟无一人被俘。参战中国军队在中印战争期间并未发现有干部战士被俘,只在90年代时,中国才发现印度还秘密关押着两名被俘中国战士,后被接回国内。印军却被俘第7旅旅长季·普·达尔维准将以下3968人,近四千人俘虏。两军战俘比例高达2:4000。以战役级别计算,这不仅在我军战史上是个奇迹,在世界现代战争史上也是绝无仅有的。

  两军的战俘比可谓是惊天差距,这值得研究,看似是偶然,却实属必然。首先,我军是师出有名的正义之师,全军上下士气高昂,誓死捍卫祖国领土,拥有不怕牺牲、不怕疲劳、不怕艰苦的豪迈勇气。思想政治工作有力,官兵一致,高度统一,宁肯战死,决不投降,从精神上、意志上完全压倒对手。如在班公洛地区进攻作战中,工兵战士罗光燮奋勇冲向雷区排雷。他的左腿、右臂相继被地雷炸断,排雷器材已用完,眼看地雷还未排完,攻击部队无法前进,他立即用身体向雷区滚进,为部队冲锋开辟了通道,最后壮烈牺牲。我军有众多这样具有大无畏牺牲精神的官兵,焉能不胜。反观印军,基本是一支有浓厚殖民地雇佣传统的军队,以当兵为养家糊口的职业,官兵普遍以应付差事的观念应付战事,作战目的不明,作战只求保命,士气低落,焉能不败。

  其次,我军经过长期各种残酷战争的洗礼,形成完整和独特的战略战术体系,战法灵活,战术得当,尤其善于打迂回穿插、分割包围的运动战。我军训练有素,适应山地作战,参战部队大多经历过残酷的西藏平叛作战,具有实战经验。指挥员胸有全局,指挥有方。步炮协同有力,武器使用娴熟。战士单兵素质强,攻如猛虎、守如泰山。如我军在追击溃退的印军时,速度奇快,常常能跑到印军的前头,一个班可以抓180个印军俘虏。再看印军,士兵净是些40岁上下的胡子兵,既无斗志也没体力,单兵武器更差,还使用着二战前的英制李·恩菲尔德手动步枪和布伦轻机枪,根本不是我军“五六式”系列单兵自动武器的对手。军官指挥混乱,战术呆板,根本无法协同。当胡子兵遇到我“娃娃兵”时,除有工事依托的二战老兵尚能抵抗外,其余基本是拔腿就跑,跑不动时便举手投降。

  第三,我军在达到作战目的后,快速与有条不紊地组织了基本无损失的撤兵。作战中军队的撤退环节,是最易受到敌人攻击的关键时刻,组织不好就要吃大亏。抗美援朝战争和对越自卫反击战中的我军被俘人员,基本是在这个环节出现的。此战,我军在前推几十公里后有计划地组织撤兵,各部队建制完整,交替掩护,避免侧翼暴露或孤军滞后。加之被打蒙了的印军,根本没有料到我军会乘胜退兵,基本没有打反击的作战行动。而在战争初期,印军的撤退恰恰和我军相反,各部队自顾自地逃命,相互之间根本无配合可言。有的部队建制被打乱,如没有头羊的羊群漫山遍野乱窜乱撞,根本组织不起有效抵抗和自保,反被乘胜追击的我军抓了大量的俘虏。

  第四,在极其困难的雪域高原,我军组织了有效的后勤保障。打现代战争,某种程度就是打后勤。战场上的战俘,有相当一部分是失去行动能力的伤员,因无法获得救治及后撤而被俘。此战,我军十分重视后勤保障,紧急突击修建了数条战区应急公路。动员支前民工5.2万余人,征用了骡马1.1万余匹,伴随部队实施山地前运后送。野战医院靠前配置,医护兵、担架队紧跟作战部队,确保伤员得到及时救治及后撤。印军显然做不到这一点,印军俘虏中就有不少是被遗弃的伤员。

  对印自卫反击战结束于1962年11月21日,中国政府宣布中国边防军全线停火,同时后撤到实际战前控制线,没有乘胜追击扩大战果。

  主要原因是1962年11月20日古巴危机结束,美国总统肯尼迪宣布取消对古巴的海上封锁,与此同时,苏联政府命令红军武装力量解除最高战备状态。两个超级大国使用武力对峙一个月的古巴危机正式结束。这时已经取得不俗战果的中国军队就应该而且必须撤退了,不仅仅是战争的后勤压力问题。

  1962年,中国还尚未拥有原子弹核武器,面对两个超级大国的干涉和核讹诈,说话还没有1964年爆炸第一枚原子弹以后那么硬气,中国军队仅仅是狭着抗美援朝的余威,在真正的国力和军事实力方面,还不是举足轻重的大国。

  美苏两霸结束古巴对峙危机以后,有了额外精力来对付其他地区的热点,包括中印之间的冲突。如果中国此时还要把战争继续打下去,一方面会让印度做出全面战争升级的举动,超出中国有计划有控制打反击战的初衷。另一方面也会受到美苏两个超级大国的联合阻击,因而中国必须干净利索的结束这场局部战争。

  中印边境一战,中国人民解放军彻底打痛也打醒了阿三。印军这才明白印军和解放军根本就不是一个等量级的,从自不量力转为心有余悸,此后不敢再在边境轻举妄动了,如此才换来边境一线50多年的安宁。可近些年来,在印度鹰派的鼓噪下,印军总想着报1962年的“一箭之仇”,在中印边境不断增加兵力,加强战场道路、机场等设施建设,中印边境不时仍会出现紧张对峙。但是,在中国国力军力大增的今天,解放军勇武的战斗精神犹在,武器装备和作战体系更是今非昔比。印军若再敢出格挑衅,下场只会比当年更惨。




Chinese only had nuke in 1964:

lGvWsiAFOIRoqp75D8YJBW3DTytQP9ZIA3LidI0oD5PxB1469849074137.jpg
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Today's Chinese military strength can wipe out Ah-Neh-land population within 15 mins, with ICBM nuke. Stay at home watch news after hitting nuke buttons. ICBMs flies from China to India less than 10mins to impact.

Ah Neh's nuke are too easy to intercept. And are unable to survive a Chinese 1st strike. Chinese nukes mostly are inside deep Giant underground infrastructure known as underground Great Wall, which is nuke-proof.
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
India under the British Empire was part of the Eight Nation Alliance that plundered China providing as many as 10K Indian troops.

A nuclear war between India and China would be the best show in Asia!
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
India is really a joke,,they do not have a full time defence minister? guess defence and the armed forces are not a priority for them,,,despite the fact they have border dispute with Pakistan and China,,,,despite the fact they have terrorist issues etc...and defence is not a priority?? ah neh land is a joke,.,




http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...ya-sabha-mp/story-h40SCFN76ORNTHzjqFPJ4K.html



India needs ‘full time’ defence minister because of China, Pakistan threats: Rajya Sabha MP

“The threats given by China and the killings of our soldiers on the border with Pakistan demand that India should have a full time defence minister,” the Congress leader said.
india Updated: Jul 02, 2017 08:30 IST
Press Trust of India, Panaji
Defence ministry
Defence minister Arun Jaitley with GOC of Baramulla based Division, Maj Gen RP Kalita during a visit to the forward areas of Rampur Sector of North Kashmi, in this file photo from May 19.(PTI)

Goa’s lone Rajya Sabha MP Shantaram Naik said on Saturday that India needs a “full time” defence minister considering the threat perception to the nation from the neighbouring countries.

“The threats given by China and the killings of our soldiers on the border with Pakistan demand that India should have a full time defence minister,” the Congress leader said.

“Chinese threat is looming large along the Sino-India border. Indians have been denied permission to visit the Kailash Mansarovar (through Nathu La). China is reminding us of the 1962 war,” he said in an e-mail to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley took additional charge of the defence ministry in March after incumbent defence minister Manohar Parrikar stepped down to go back to Goa as chief minister.

“The absence of a full time defence minister, with one bureaucrat, Ajit Doval (the National Security Advisor), running the defence ministry, has further encouraged the Chinese to believe that India cannot do anything beyond empty rhetoric,” he alleged.

Naik also criticised the GST rollout celebrations saying, “Your (the Centre’s) focus in celebrating the GST regime and fooling the people, just as the government did during demonetisation, will not help the nation.”
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I hope war breaks out between ah nehs land and China. Then we can round up all ah nehs employment pass holders in internment camps in pulau ubin
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nazi xi jinping up to no good again. Just before he cane go pkwer, pla were harassing uninhabited japanese islands. Then it harassed vietnamese and philipino fisheremen. Then the artificial islands came up and their utter disregard for international law.
Only the malays know how to treat chinese aggresion and send them scuttering back to their "tongsan".
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
PLA actually have every specifically designed and tested missiles tailored for every targets, and DF-25 is one for Ah-Nehs.

This is to ensure max effectiveness and no wastage of resources, and correctly deployed and trained for each. I can give you examples, and each missiles have ideal range; speed; payload capacity; warhead types; penetration aids; trajectory style; ballistic characteristics suitable for their targets:

DF-11 (350km@800kg) & DF-15(600km@500~900kg) for Taiwan. (range@payload)

DF-15(600km@500~900kg) & DF-16(1000~1600km@1~2tons) for South Korea & Japan [DF-16 nickname= Okinawa Express]

DF-21(1800~3000km@600~1000kg) for Singapore & South China Seas

DF-25(3200km@2000+kg) for India = Prata Express

DF-26(6000km@1500~2000kg) for Guam & West Pacifics

DF-31(8000~11270km@99~1350kg) nuke USA & UK single warhead

DF-41(14000km) 3/10/50 nuke warheads nuke USA UK & global upto 50 mini nuke warheads


There are too many other examples including cruise & SLBM etc not going to go through all.

Prata Express DF-25 can ideally range whole of India with multiple warheads including nukes from convenient Chinese bases. To wipeout whole Ah-Neh population, only less than 2 dozen missiles is sufficient. To save cost some closest targets like airfields and radars & missile bases can be taken care of with cheaper DF11/DF-15 single stage missiles.

Quantity available for DF-25 is way way over kill to target Ah-Neh-land, but purposes are actually vast, and they are fitted with all sorts of different warheads, their function can actually include anti-satellite & anti-missile. When there is a war, it is of key importance to strike away satellites ASAP to take care of business. As can see on the last picture, when PLA missile army moves DF-25 by train loads, how many trains were used in a single movement operation? At least 4 rail tracks full of DF-25 TELs, meaning HUNDREDS in a missile army formation unit.


Img354715767.jpg



n11a00_p_02_02.jpg


1192449452_a9c74ab3dbd580a4dc74d45eab499606.jpg



https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/东风-25


东风-25中程弹道导弹

维基百科,自由的百科全书
(重定向自东风-25)
Tango-nosources.svg
本条目没有列出任何参考或来源。(2012年3月6日)
維基百科所有的內容都應該可供查證。请协助添加来自可靠来源的引用以改善这篇条目。无法查证的内容可能被提出异议而移除。

东风-25型导弹,代号DF-25,中华人民共和国研制的第二代战略导弹,是一种先进的中程地地战略导弹,它是在原东风-21中程弹道导弹基础上改进而成。

东风-25弹道导弹由2个推进器组成,是一种使用固体燃料推进剂并且机动运行发射的中程弹道导弹。2004-05年第二炮兵部队对外简单介绍了有关东风-25型弹道导弹情况。据称这种导弹可以提供2种打击模式,单弹头打击和多弹头分导打击模式。最大载荷搭载能力略超過2000公斤,最大射程2700公里。发射载车是一辆6X6轮式重型载重车辆,具有公路和简易道路通行能力。

东风-25弹道导弹是中国最先进的第二代战略导弹之一,中国的第二代战略导弹包括东风-21/25/31/41及巨浪二型,这些导弹全部以机动发射,可带核弹头,准确而且存活系数高。
参见

东风系列导弹

查 论 编
 
Last edited:

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Today's Chinese military strength can wipe out Ah-Neh-land population within 15 mins, with ICBM nuke. Stay at home watch news after hitting nuke buttons. ICBMs flies from China to India less than 10mins to impact.

Ah Neh's nuke are too easy to intercept. And are unable to survive a Chinese 1st strike. Chinese nukes mostly are inside deep Giant underground infrastructure known as underground Great Wall, which is nuke-proof.

If there is a nuclear exhange the world will suffer.

Radiation & nuclear clouds will be created. It will worst than Fukushima.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If there is a nuclear exhange the world will suffer.

Radiation & nuclear clouds will be created. It will worst than Fukushima.

The dangers from Fukushima have been proven to be exaggerated. The radiation didn't spread very far, and most sinkies are still visiting Tokyo for holidays. Japan is even going to host the olympics in 2020.

Given that nukes haven't been used since WW2, all the reports on the powers of the nukes are probably wildly exaggerated to prevent a WW3 from happening.
 

sleaguepunter

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If there is a nuclear exhange the world will suffer.

Radiation & nuclear clouds will be created. It will worst than Fukushima.

a nuclear exchange btwn both the largest and second largest population will set to reduce world population by a few hundred millions if not billion. looking from another angle, may not be a bad thing in the short term.:rolleyes:
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
If there is a nuclear exhange the world will suffer.

Radiation & nuclear clouds will be created. It will worst than Fukushima.

World is confirmed dying Total Extinction by over-poputlation & over-consumption. Stevens Hopkins warned flee out of earth or be extincted in 100 yrs.

Nuke whole planet is an exercise that can be completed within 1 hr. Radioactivity will cause the survivors cancers, but only 1 or 2 generations, after which, (as like in Hiroshima & Nagasaki) the radiation level decayed out & man at least can survive with a reasonable tiny population level.

So you some very up close photos of nuke warhead from Ex-USSR and kept in nuke museum. Fuse and fuel removed.

museumoftherocketforces-20.jpg


museumoftherocketforces-12.jpg


Storage and transportation in special steel crates:
museumoftherocketforces-11.jpg


Far behind is famous 200 ton SS-18 Satan ICBM that flies to USA from USSR with 10 warheads.
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
World is confirmed dying Total Extinction by over-poputlation & over-consumption. Stevens Hopkins warned flee out of earth or be extincted in 100 yrs.

In just twenty years, the world could be quite a different place due to technological and demographic changes. Humans have made breakthrough after breakthrough to increase energy, food and water production by exponential amounts. There's also lots of reserve of raw materials like iron, wood, crude oil, fish etc left for future generations.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
In just twenty years, the world could be quite a different place due to technological and demographic changes. Humans have made breakthrough after breakthrough to increase energy, food and water production by exponential amounts. There's also lots of reserve of raw materials like iron, wood, crude oil, fish etc left for future generations.

You are dreaming and spouting craps that you have no fucking idea.

Technologies and engineering is no hope, and they are the main culprits which squandered away the LIMITED Resources, and CONVERTED them all into WASTE & POLLUTION. One-Way conversion always.

Remember that the RECYCLE is a hoax, because it spends huge amount of energies & resources including materials, in the recycle process itself!

Energies spent eventually converted to HEAT & Global Warming & Climate destruction. Not reversible!

Oil & gas will be finished globally within 47+ years, our Cousin @ Independence Brunei will see end of all it's oil & gas production within next 2 to 5 yrs, 2yrs for oil, 5 yrs for gas. Remember, that these oil & gas were accumulated creation from billions of years, and we spent it within just one generation - in Brunei it is the generation of this existing sultan. His children will NOT have oil & gas!

Technological Breakthrough is nothing but breaking the planet further, and we are at the very end of breaking the planet already, after man's good ways of living from Paleolithic Age 2.5 million years ago.

The breakthrough by Xijinping's combustible ice is example. Crude oil took billions of years to create & is used up so rapidly, converted to global warming & pollutions. So combustible ice at most is game over in one more generation. But POLLUTIONS ACCUMULATES.

Even if man had ways to bring resources in from outside planet, and even got ways to extract waste & heat to outside of planet, it will still be an overpopulation issue, plus extinction of other spices. Eventually man = the ultimate waste will clutter the whole planet! Need to be dumped out as well.

Why want so much of man in the 1st place? What for? Why ruin planet earth to pamper (mostly useless) man? Why ruin the universe one planet by another?


Ang Moh HUMANITY == STUPIDITY == ULTIMATE FOOLISHNESS


Fucktard CB Ang Moh false claim that their fucking god appointed them to manage this planet & exploit everything, their crimes driven from this stupid falsehood is too serious as it a TOTAL EXTINCTION. Must punish & destroy fucking Ang Mohs & their god. No other ways at all.
 
Top