If the world is serious about going green, the whole world has to make a pact on this and take action. Agreed!!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Trump to pull US out of Paris Agreement
- Thread starter kelton65
- Start date
If the world is serious about going green, the whole world has to make a pact on this and take action. Agreed!!
This is what I love about the west.
They respect the individual and take the individual's opinion into SERIOUS consideration.
this is why democracy will go nowhere like India.
It is ironic that the biggest polluters of the earth, the Chinese, are stepping forward.
And then also, doubly ironic that Asian nations are pushing ahead with a modified TPP without US involvement - an agreement that would essentially enable MNCs to BYPASS whatever the paris accord says, or whatever REMAINS after the Chinese have step up and taken control of it.
Everyone's a bloody hypocrite here!
And then also, doubly ironic that Asian nations are pushing ahead with a modified TPP without US involvement - an agreement that would essentially enable MNCs to BYPASS whatever the paris accord says, or whatever REMAINS after the Chinese have step up and taken control of it.
Everyone's a bloody hypocrite here!
It is paradoxical too coming from the President of the UNITED states as multilateral agreements mirror federalist model to a certain extent. Is he going to say federal judges or even the President should not dictate rules over the individual states and the President should negotiate one to one with each state on immigration and jobs instead of signing an Executive Order?
Last edited:
Pointless reading the agreement. The devil is not in the details and we all know that Trump has no idea what it does, what it means and what it is supposed to do. But he knows the rednecks and the bible thumpers are in the same zone as him. If Obama rejected the Paris Agreement he probably would have asked the G7 to convene it again.
The White House Admin staff dare not even state his actual position. Never seen so many well qualified people in the Admin looking like dills or more accurately are prepared to be a dill.
The White House Admin staff dare not even state his actual position. Never seen so many well qualified people in the Admin looking like dills or more accurately are prepared to be a dill.
PAP will follow any agreement, how ever terrible, to the ends of the earth.
the constitution is not written as a multilateral agreement but as a set of laws governing the federation of multiple states. in a multilateral agreement "sovereign" nations as opposed to states stripped of their "sovereignty" (in fact founding member states of u.s.a. did not have sovereignty in the 1st place as they were colonies of the english king) deal with each other in trade issues and other lofty ideals such as anti-human and anti-drug trafficking, etc. in the u.s. constipation, oops constitution, former colonies and new states are subject to federal laws with little to zero hope of secession and or pulling out of a coital relationship even if it's bdsm abusive day in day out.
obviously, you do not know what the fuck you're talking about nor his support base nor how the wh works.....thus resorting to calling names and dropping your sindian cow dung.
Dont forget any governments get together parties like this climate change party are for jiak hong only. So is TTP party.
Can go free trip in Paris for shopping at tax payers expenses.
End of day goods are made in China w stickers french cap brands.
Fuck what climate change lah .... shopping maybe...
Can go free trip in Paris for shopping at tax payers expenses.
End of day goods are made in China w stickers french cap brands.
Fuck what climate change lah .... shopping maybe...
anything organized by the un, such as the unfccc, on climate change is a complete farce. look at these useless bureaucratic jiaklioabee clowns.
The other bunch of parasitic twits are the people that make up the EU Parliament. They're probably even more jiakliaobee than the UN.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament - 750 MEMBERS!!!!!
And let's not forget the European Commission that has a staff of 23,000 who shuffle documents from one desk to the next.
over 175 clowns and their cuntries. what have they done in the u.n. existence since the end of ww2? it will require the u.s. to set things right again when shit hits the fan.
was at brussels and luxembourg to visit their offices, and i'm still reeling from shock at the sprawl of buildings, offices, titles and staff assigned to them. at least they are modern, classy and well mannered, but overly bloated and ineffectually organized - a monster organization of fancy names with nothing to do.
while $1b has been spent by the u.s. on the funding, obama pledged $3b to get the accord going in 2015. when the u.n. learned that u.s. would be bearing the brunt of the minimum amount of $100b to be funded by developed nations to spur developing nations to sign on, 195 cuntries happily agreed. what a crock of shit for u.s. taxpayers. follow the money, and we know where this is going.
from npr...
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...o-what-exactly-is-in-the-paris-climate-accord
$100 Billion
"To help developing countries switch from fossil fuels to greener sources of energy and adapt to the effects of climate change, the developed world will provide $100 billion a year," NPR's Christopher Joyce reports.
But that amount is identified as a "floor," not a ceiling.
"Developed countries won inclusion of language that would up the ante in subsequent years," he explains, "so that financial aid will keep ramping up over time."
If money is the issue, the US can simply stay within the Paris agreement & STOP paying $$.
They can then open discussions on getting better terms.
By withdrawing from the accord Trump is giving up on all the potential money that the US companies could make developing & selling green technologies.
His claim that he was doing it for Pittsburgh is laughable because Pittsburgh voted for Hilary & they have adopting many green technologies & see it as the future. Suspect that the main reason he decided to withdraw from Paris was because it was supported by Obama.
