• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Smash porridge store culprit is a Siao Char Boh and 2 useless unkers

rambo22

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pang was brought to court on Wednesday in handcuffs. Police prosecutors sought to remand her for two weeks at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), but defence lawyer K Ravendran objected.

He said Pang has a five-month-old baby and had not made care arrangements for the child.

The district judge granted Pang bail of S$5,000 to arrange for childcare before being remanded at IMH for psychiatric assessment.

Pang has a history of psychiatric treatment, the court heard, but has not been attending follow-up appointments or taking her medication.

Tan Sung Meng, 46, faces a charge of committing a rash act endangering the safety of others, while Pang Pei Pei, 40, faces a charge of committing mischief.

The two are accused of acting together with Ang Sim Poh, who has not yet been charged.
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1 stone kill 3 kukujiao.
Siao charbo tio kept in buangkok green
Siao charbo has free meals and free counseling
Siao charbo baby will be taken care by welfare

Buangkok green shd expand their area. Many mad humans in the wild.
 

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Capture.png


SINGAPORE - Two Singaporeans who were allegedly involved in the ruckus that took place at a porridge eatery along Upper Serangoon Road last Saturday (May 27) were hauled to court on Wednesday morning.

Pang Pei Pei, 40, was charged with mischief by throwing bowls, tables and chairs into Heng Long Teochew Porridge restaurant, causing damage to the premises.

She allegedly committed the offence with Tan Sung Meng and Ang Sim Poh at around 3.45am last Saturday.

They are accused of causing $5,000 in losses to the eatery.

Tan, 46, was charged with committing a rash act by throwing the same items into the eatery.

He allegedly committed the offence with Pang and Ang.


Police said in a press release on Tuesday that two men and one woman aged between 40 and 53, were arrested after the incident. The Straits Times understands that a fourth person, a man, is still at large.

According to earlier reports, a group of customers at the restaurant were upset when their bill came up to $28.

The restaurant was back in business by noon that day.

Pang is represented by lawyers K. Ravendra and Tay Hao Ran. She was offered a bail of $5,000 and will be back in court on June 7.

Tan, who is unrepresented, was also offered a bail of $5,000 and will be back in court on June 21.

Offenders convicted of mischief and caused at least $500 in losses can be jailed up to two years and fined.

Those convicted of committing a rash act can be jailed up to six months and fined up to $2,500.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Eating in sg is getting expensive thanks to pap.
When was last time These chao ah Beng and ah Lian ate supper? Order pomfret and duck meat for 4 and still complain expensive. How much they were expecting to be charged? (Pardon the pun)....$10?
 
Top