• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Looks like India finally has MORE people than China!

Do you BELIEVE that China's population is REALLY BIGGER than India's?

  • Yes, and I believe that it will [b]REMAIN BIGGER[/b] than India's until the end of the world! :cool:

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I'm not sure...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3

flatearther

Alfrescian
Loyal
And this is according to a Chinese researcher at a US university:

"China may have 90 million fewer people than claimed (that’s twice of Spain’s population) | South China Morning Post"
scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2095311/china-population-much-smaller-you-think-researchers-say
(PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 23 May, 2017, 11:47am; by Wendy Wu)

China’s population may be much smaller than official data suggests, according to a group of researchers, meaning the nation will be replaced by India as the world’s most populous country sooner than expected.

It may also mean the problems created by China’s rapidly ageing population and shrinking workforce are more serious than feared, according to the experts.

China’s real population may have been about 1.29 billion last year, 90 million fewer people than the official figure released by the National Bureau of Statistics, Yi Fuxian, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said at a symposium at Peking University on Monday.

That’s about twice the size of Spain’s population, which is slightly over 46 million.

Yi, the author of "Big Country with an Empty Nest", an influential book arguing that China is in need of more rather than fewer births, said China’s official population data after 1990 has been overstated.

His research suggested there were 377.6 million new births from 1991 to 2016, less than the official figure of 464.8 million.

Yi’s theory of overstated government data was echoed by other researchers attending the forum which called for the removal of population controls and improved data quality.

According to official statistics, India’s population reached 1.33 billion last year, compared with China’s official figure of 1.37 billion in 2015.

China has gradually loosened the decades old one-child policy since 2011 as its population started to age and the labour force shrank.

Parents are now able to have two children, but the central government has still refrained from completely lifting birth control.

China has the world’s largest population aged over 60. This section of society accounted for 15.5 per cent of the Chinese population in 2014. The United Nations estimates about 500 million people in China’s population will be over 60 by the middle of the century.

The low birthrate has led to a shrinking workforce, with cheap labour previously one of the mainstays underpinning China’s rapid economic growth over the past three decades.

“The government has overestimated the birth rate and underestimated the speed of demographic changes,” said Li Jianxin, a demographer at Peking University and vocal opponent of China’s family planning policy.

The inaccuracy of the data resulted in the failure of the authorities to take timely, corrective measures, he said.

Liang Zhongtang, a researcher at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, also questioned the accuracy of the official birth data.

“The population data since the adaption of one-child policy has been seriously false and the family planning report has been overstated by 30 per cent,” said Liang. “The birth control policy which has last nearly four decades is not in accordance with reality. It is imperative that the government should abandon the family planning system.”
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
in one city alone, there's about 6.9m shitskins unaccounted for around the calcutta area. refugees from bangladesh and dalits from bay of bengal. india's actual population should have already surpassed china's by 69m.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
But you forgot? Xijinping changed Chinese family planning law to allow 2nd child from single child policy?

too little too late. the inflection point of no return was in 1996, 20 years too late. the next 200 years will never undo the damage done. perhaps it's a blessing for the rest of the world.
 

Poseidon

Alfrescian
Loyal
in one city alone, there's about 6.9m shitskins unaccounted for around the calcutta area. refugees from bangladesh and dalits from bay of bengal. india's actual population should have already surpassed china's by 69m.

69 is a magic number for the world?
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It's such a relief the world will have significantly less Commie Red Chinks in about half a century. Heaven has eyes!
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It's such a relief the world will have significantly less Commie Red Chinks in about half a century. Heaven has eyes!

wrong bakayaro!!!!i dunno what u are smoking but my crystal ball tells me that this planet's future is one thats dominated by ah tiongs and shitskins!!!!
 
Last edited:

griffin

Alfrescian
Loyal
Thank the Muslims for serious fucking and indulging in multiple marriages to boost their population with the view of taking over India. https://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?243876-Looks-like-India-finally-has-MORE-people-than-China[/url]!
 

flatearther

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Does India have more people than China? A U.S. researcher claims Beijing’s population statistics are wrong. - The Washington Post"
washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/05/24/does-india-have-more-people-than-china-a-u-s-researcher-claims-beijings-population-statistics-are-wrong
(By Adam Taylor; May 24)

What's the most populous nation in the world? For years, the answer to that question was simple and rarely disputed: China. But this week an academic has sparked widespread discussion around the world by making a bold claim — that China's official population estimates were wrong and in fact India was now the world's largest country.

This potentially radical suggestion was made Monday by Yi Fuxian, a researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, during an event at China's Peking University.

According to the South China Morning Post, Yi suggested that China had only 377.6 million new births from 1991 to 2016, far less than the official figure of 464.8 million. This meant that China's official population estimate, currently at 1.38 billion, was wrong, Yi said. Instead it should have been 90 million lower — a gap roughly the same as Germany and Belgium's population combined.

That would make it 1.29 billion, and lower than India's estimated 1.32 billion population, according to Yi.

A new estimate claims India's population is greater than China's

According to academic Yu Fuxian, China's real population is far lower than official estimates.

Multiple media outlets in China, India and beyond quickly picked up the news. If Yi was right, the implications would certainly be big. Not only would it mean that India had already overtaken China as the world's largest nation — something the United Nations had estimated to happen in 2022 — but that China's population growth slowdown was worse than many thought and being hidden from the public.

Reached via email, Yi said the controversy was “no surprise” to him, but added that he had already noted his belief that China's official estimates were wrong in the 2013 edition of his book, “Big Country with an Empty Nest,” which took a critical look at China's family-planning policies.

In fact, Yi says he was sure the estimates were wrong far earlier. “In 2003, I knew China official announcement population data is much higher than the real population,” Yi wrote from Taiyuan, China.

Among the many notable elements of Yi's claim is where he's making it from: mainland China.

The academic, born in Hunan province, had moved to the United States in 1999. After moving to take up graduate studies at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (he later worked as a fellow at the Medical College of Wisconsin and moved on to the University of Wisconsin Madison as a scientist in 2002), Yi quickly became a vocal critic of China's family-planning policies, including its “one-child” rule.

In his writings, Yi suggested that these policies were limiting China's economic growth, meaning it could never compete with the United States. He also suggested that China could soon have a negative birthrate and a declining population, like its neighbor Japan.

Yi, who remains a Chinese citizen, claimed that his views brought him into conflict with the Chinese state. “Big Country with an Empty Nest,” first published in 2007, was initially banned in mainland China. He later told the New York Times that he was warned in 2010 he faced arrest if he returned home after helping his sister-in-law escape a state-ordered forced abortion.

China seemed to acquiesce to at least some of his arguments in 2015, when it abandoned the “one-child” policy and allowed all couples to have two children. Last year, Yi returned to China as a guest, but just a few months later his social media accounts were shut down — which he saw as a futile attempt at censorship.

Yi's status as a passionate activist against China's family planning policies is well-known and has led some to question his estimates of China's population.

Wang Feng, a demographer from the University of California, Irvine, expressed extreme skepticism of Yi's estimate. "Yi's conclusion is based on a very sloppy and overly simplistic assumption: that the officially published Chinese numbers overstated the number of births by a wide margin," Wang said, arguing that the birth censuses which Yi appears to have based his prediction on had their own problem of undercounting.

"Serious scholars have analyzed the census and other data and have made adjustment, unlike him," Wang added.

But according to the South China Morning Post, a number of other academics at Monday's Peking University Event seemed to concur that the government figures were off. “The government has overestimated the birthrate and underestimated the speed of demographic changes,” Li Jianxin, a demographer at Peking University was quoted as saying.

Yong Cai, a demography expert at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, said he too disagreed with Yi's estimate and thought official statistics were closer to the truth. However, Yong said the fact that people were talking seriously about Chinese government data represented a major shift.

"Although Yi's estimate is erroneous, the public attention on it reflects an important change in Chinese society," Yong wrote in an e-mail. "The government no longer has the monopoly on information."
 
Top