• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Kong Hee Permanently Barred From Church Leadership!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE – Six former City Harvest Church (CHC) leaders have been permanently barred from holding key positions in a charity organisation, said the Commissioner of Charities (COC) in a statement on Wednesday (May 24).

The COC said the decision was made after a review which had taken into account that the six leaders – Kong Hee, John Lam, Tan Ye Peng, Sharon Tan, Serina Wee and Chew Eng Han – were convicted of criminal breach of trust, which included falsification of accounts involving dishonesty and deception.


The COC said that as a result of the decision, the six former leaders “are permanently barred from having general control and management of the administration of any charity”.

The COC also named two more church staffers, Kelvin Teo Meng How and Jacqueline Tan Su Pheng – both executive members of CHC – and said that they were “comparatively less culpable” than the six convicted leaders in the “mismanagement and misconduct” of the church.

Teo exercises general control and management of the administration of the church, said the COC.

Warning letters were issued to the two individuals as they had adhered “to the voluntary suspension from their respective positions” in the church for a period of four years since 2013.

However, they were also listed under a new Restriction Order, along with the six convicted leaders, that prevents them from holding office or being employed by the church without the COC’s prior approval.

“This is to ensure that the charitable assets of CHC are safeguarded at all times,” said the COC.

It added that they will not be barred from performing religious duties.

http://m.todayonline.com/singapore/...hurch-leaders-barred-holding-office-charities
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is for show. His wife has control and so spouses and friends of the others. This is aimed at blur fucks amongst Singaporeans.
By the way, its for their charity arm and not the church. They are still allowed to milk the vulnerable and naive at will who want to give to the church as these restriction orders are ambivalent at best.
 
Last edited:

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Kong Hee can convert to worship this blue keling shin who looks more chio than his horseface.

heidi-klum-halloween-costume-sheeva-3.jpg
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what does it matter?those guys are puppets,Kong hee can simply install another 5 gullible and easily impressionable morons to do his dirty work.

the fact they are implicit in this ridiculous nonsense without any monetary gain or additional pay is beyond believe.
 

aurvandil

Alfrescian
Loyal
When Singaporeans see others doing something wrong, they want the offenders who are caught to be harshly and severely punished.

However when they themselves do something wrong, they demand mercy and to be let off lightly.

For all those who condemn KH, how many can honestly say they have not lied and cheated when the opportunity of not being caught presented itself.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
This however is vastly different. It was organised to the tune of millions, it was money taken from naive individuals who have been milked for years. If he had run a proper business and went wayward due to cashflow or due to economic downturn, many would understand. Note also the lack of remorse during the whole process from 5 of the 6. Kong only apologised when the Govt intervened and he then realised that the game was up. He claimed that he had to sell his Sentosa pad to fund his defence but it is still there because suckers still finding him as private individuals.

Honesty what has he done for people - even a hawker contributes to society and we can forgive if he transgressed. This guy, Durai and RI Buddhist priest were abusing the charities they were entrusted with. Its a whole different ball game.

When Singaporeans see others doing something wrong, they want the offenders who are caught to be harshly and severely punished.

However when they themselves do something wrong, they demand mercy and to be let off lightly.

For all those who condemn KH, how many can honestly say they have not lied and cheated when the opportunity of not being caught presented itself.
 

aurvandil

Alfrescian
Loyal
In your view, what would have been a just punishment for him and why?

This however is vastly different. It was organised to the tune of millions, it was money taken from naive individuals who have been milked for years. If he had run a proper business and went wayward due to cashflow or due to economic downturn, many would understand. Note also the lack of remorse during the whole process from 5 of the 6. Kong only apologised when the Govt intervened and he then realised that the game was up. He claimed that he had to sell his Sentosa pad to fund his defence but it is still there because suckers still finding him as private individuals.

Honesty what has he done for people - even a hawker contributes to society and we can forgive if he transgressed. This guy, Durai and RI Buddhist priest were abusing the charities they were entrusted with. Its a whole different ball game.
 

Debonerman

Alfrescian
Loyal
When Singaporeans see others doing something wrong, they want the offenders who are caught to be harshly and severely punished.

However when they themselves do something wrong, they demand mercy and to be let off lightly.

For all those who condemn KH, how many can honestly say they have not lied and cheated when the opportunity of not being caught presented itself.

Have you ever " lied and cheated when the opportunity of not being caught presented itself?"
 

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Roped these ex-con as yelow ribbon spokesman? Thieves market be history after July,where s KH gonna p leddle his snake oil?

kong-hee-oil-33eukkhv0m1f11zov7kvm2.jpg
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Rule through Proxy horse. What's the difference ?

Will the horse jump ship and run away from him, skim away all the money and run away with another man ?

hoyeowsun1.jpg


She has arrangements with her stallion here, he's suggesting something with that hand sign.
 

fupikee

Alfrescian
Loyal
hoyeowsun1.jpg


She has arrangements with her stallion here, he's suggesting something with that hand sign.

She must have thought she looked sexy in such a pose with a blackie...actually, truth be told, she looked no more than a street slut who happened to hook on to a nigger, .....anytime, even the geylang 20+ indo or pinoy street walker would look more curvaceous and sexy.....not to speak of the hordes of thai, viet or prc workers in the various lanes and houses....

....act swee, beh swee......a mere street slut having the chance to enjoy a debauched life, funded by clueless and ignorant cult devotees....in the process, many needed to go to prison because of her (of course these were still guilty as charged)...yet she goes scot free.....like a cheepee cunt....
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Catholic Priest Joachim Kang was given 7 years for embezzling $5.1 of church funds. Did not involve any sophistication. He did not manipulate others including the accountants.

What is just punishment is what is prescribed in the laws of the land and the courts.
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
This however is vastly different. It was organised to the tune of millions, it was money taken from naive individuals who have been milked for years. If he had run a proper business and went wayward due to cashflow or due to economic downturn, many would understand. Note also the lack of remorse during the whole process from 5 of the 6. Kong only apologised when the Govt intervened and he then realised that the game was up. He claimed that he had to sell his Sentosa pad to fund his defence but it is still there because suckers still finding him as private individuals.

Honesty what has he done for people - even a hawker contributes to society and we can forgive if he transgressed. This guy, Durai and RI Buddhist priest were abusing the charities they were entrusted with. Its a whole different ball game.

No point to bar kong. He can still own many companies.
 
Top