• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Useless Tomahawk Cruise Missiles US$94 millions for 59 shots, 36 MISSED Syria!

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube_share;tLgil4UC1fo]https://youtu.be/tLgil4UC1fo[/video]

https://www.rt.com/news/383858-syria-us-strike-inefficient/


‘Low efficiency’: Only 23 Tomahawk missiles out of 59 reached Syrian airfield, Russian MoD says

Published time: 7 Apr, 2017 09:41
Edited time: 8 Apr, 2017 18:51
Get short URL
‘Low efficiency’: Only 23 Tomahawk missiles out of 59 reached Syrian airfield, Russian MoD says
FILE PHOTO: Shayrat Airfield in Homs, Syria is seen in this DigitalGlobe satellite image released by the U.S. Defense Department on April 6, 2017. © DigitalGlobe / U.S. Department of Defense / Reuters
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook12.1KShare to TwitterShare to Reddit14Share to StumbleUponShare to Google+Share to Tumblr
The Russian Defense Ministry says the US missile strike on a Syrian airfield wasn't very effective, with only 23 out of 59 Tomahawk missiles reaching their target. The locations of the remaining 36 missiles’ impact is now unknown, the ministry added.
Trends
US missiles strike Syria

Follow RT’s LIVE UPDATES on US missile strike against Syria

The strike on the Shayrat airfield in Syria’s Homs Province destroyed a material storage depot, a training facility, a canteen, six MiG-23 aircraft in repair hangars and a radar station.
Read more
© Россия 24 1st footage of destruction at US-hit Shayrat airbase in Syria (VIDEO)

The runway, taxiways and the Syrian aircraft on the parking apron remained undamaged, Russia’s Defense Ministry spokesman said in a statement.

The ministry described the combat efficiency of the strike as “quite poor.”

“On April 7, 2017, between 3:42am and 3:56am Moscow time, two US Navy destroyers (USS Porter and USS Ross) fired 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at Shayrat airfield in Homs Province, Syria, from an area near the Island of Crete in the Mediterranean Sea.

“According to our sources, only 23 of them reached the Syrian airbase,” Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Major-General Igor Konashenkov said, adding that the points of impact of the other 36 cruise missiles remain unknown.

The ministry also slammed the US actions as “a gross violation” of the memorandum of understanding signed by Moscow in Washington back in 2015 to prevent flight incidents in Syrian airspace.

READ MORE: Russia suspends flight safety memorandum over Syria after US missile strike – Foreign Ministry

All justifications for the strike are “groundless claims,” the ministry continued.
Read more
U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) conducts strike operations against Syria on April 7, 2017. © Ford Williams / Courtesy U.S. Navy / Handout via REUTERS ISIS used US missile strike to launch new offensive near Palmyra, Homs governor tells RT

“Russia made an earlier statement that the Syrian forces did not use chemical weapons. We are waiting for clarification from the US on undisputed – as they claim – evidence that it was the Syrian Army that deployed chemical weapons in the town of Khan Sheikhoun.”

The ministry also pointed to the events that followed the strikes, a large-scale offensive against the Syrian Army carried out by Islamic State and Al-Nusra Front terrorists.

“We hope that this offensive was in no way coordinated with the US,” the ministry said.

"A number of measures aimed at strengthening and improving the effectiveness of the Syrian air defense system will be implemented in the near future in order to protect the vital parts of the Syrian infrastructure," Konashenkov said.

AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook




https://finance.nine.com.au/2017/04/07/15/09/how-much-a-tomahawk-missile-costs

Here's how much 59 Tomahawk missiles cost

By 9Finance
Apr 7th, 2017
FShare
TTweet
BMail

The Trump government has launched 59 tomahawk missiles on a Syrian military airfield, which represents one of the most direct responses we've seen to the Bashar al-Assad regime.

While it is a direct diplomatic move, in military terms it's a relatively small-scale order to make – but that doesn’t mean it wasn't insanely expensive.

According to the US Department of Defence's annual budget, a single Tomahawk missile costs $1.59 million.

Combine that by the 59 missiles the US ordered to be fired off two warships in the Mediterranean Sea, and you're looking at a bill of around $94 million.

That sounds pretty costly, but in military terms the "Tactical Tomahawk Cruise Missile" is a relatively battle-proven weapon with origins that stretch back to the 1970s.

(A man inspects a Tomahawk missile. Image: Tim Cook / AAP)

Designed to be deployed from the sea – either shot out of the torpedo tubes of submarines or fired from the decks of battleships – the Tomahawk is a long-range weapon that can hit targets without endangering the firer's life.

Because the Tomahawk is classed as a "cruise missile", it flies at roughly the same speed all the way until it hits its target – a neck-breaking 890 km/h.

Depending on the type of fuel used in the missile, it has an operating range of up to 2,500 km, which means after firing it would take the Tomahawk just under three hours to reach a target at the end of its range.

One single missile weighs a staggering 1300 kg, is six metres long and usually carries a 450kg warhead designed to deliver precise but devastating damage.

While the Tomahawk isn't as devastating as some of the missiles carried on-board manned aircraft, it is typically used when Western nations want a long-range weapon that can be fired from safe territory.

The missiles were first deployed in 1991 during the Gulf War, and have been in service – albeit with costly tech upgrades – ever since.

The last time the US used Tomahawks was only in October last year, when the USS Nitze fired five missiles at three targets in Yemen in response to missiles being fired at American targets.


Kim Jong Nuke is smart, and surely knows that he is safe, and US is a toothless dog, can bark a lot but can not bite!

0592948dea.jpg
 
Last edited:

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ang Moh Trump actually ordered to fire all 60 Tomahawk Cruise Missiles from the 2 warships at Syrian Air Base, not 59.

What actually happened is there is one of the 60 @US$1.59M missile fucking FAILED TO LAUNCH! Lousy quality! Expensive and useless!

It would be more wonderful if the crap exploded inside the warship when attempting to launch, detonate all the remaining missiles, sink the fucking warship.

When missiles are launched like this on the warship, their flames actually heats up the other missiles in adjacent container cells. BBQ them up. So they can get damaged or toasted before being launched. If a ship needs to launch 30 missiles, each will heat up the rest of the remaining missiles with their flames. There could easily be 15~20+ repetition of such BBQ cycles for those missiles to get launched last. The very last one could be already fucking on fire or smoking blackened by time it's turn come to being launched.
ob_6519e9_tomahawk-block-iv-cruise-missile-photo.jpg


As the picture showed their container cells are (4X4)X2 per ship or 32 missiles, it could well be originally to launch 64 missiles instead of 59 from the 2 warships, and totally 5 out of 64 failed to fire!


0592948dea.jpg
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
oh dear.....so this is the most advanced most high tech military in the world?

50 percent failed to hit a static target?maybe the missiles are made in China?
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
My question is how much does the military supplier make for one missile fired ? 1 million USD per missile ? or 100k USD per missile ?

If it does not hit the intended target, will the intended supplier get paid ?
 
Top