• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor nations

SeeFartLoong

Alfrescian
Loyal
顺我者昌,逆我者亡

Those with us are the new Rich & Strong winners, those against us are the weak losers going broke and dying. The Beijing Gathering is the party showing who are in and who are out, in a very clear way.

http://www.todayonline.com/chinaindia/china/xi-pushes-china-be-centre-new-economic-order

29634640.JPG



Xi pushes for China to be centre of new economic order

Xi pushes for China to be centre of new economic order
Chinese President Xi Jinping making a toast at the welcoming banquet on the first day of the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing yesterday. Leaders from 29 countries are attending the forum, as well as the heads of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Photo Reuters
As the US turns to protectionist policies, Beijing instead affirms importance of open, free trade

mail
print
View all comments
Tweet

Published: 4:00 AM, May 15, 2017

BEIJING — Chinese President Xi Jinping delivered a sweeping vision of a new economic global order yesterday, positioning his country as an alternative to an inward-looking United States under President Donald Trump.

The Chinese leader also pledged US$124 billion (S$173 billion) for development banks in China that he said would spearhead vast spending on infrastructure across countries besides forging a path of peace, inclusiveness and free trade, while calling for the abandonment of old models based on rivalry and diplomatic power games.

Mr Xi used the Silk Road summit, attended by leaders and top officials from around the world, to bolster China’s global leadership ambitions as Mr Trump promotes “America First” and adopts a protectionist stance on trade policies.

“We should build an open platform of cooperation and uphold and grow an open world economy,” he told the opening of the two-day gathering in Beijing.

China has touted what it formally calls the Belt and Road initiative as a new way to boost global development since Mr Xi unveiled the plan in 2013. It aims to expand links between Asia, Africa, Europe and beyond, underpinned by billions of dollars in infrastructure investment.

The initiative spans some 65 countries representing 60 per cent of the world population and about a third of global gross domestic product. The China Development Bank has earmarked US$890 billion for some 900 projects.

The project is seen as a practical solution to relieve China’s industrial overcapacity. But it could also serve Beijing’s geopolitical ambitions as Washington retreats into “America First” policies.

Mr Xi said the world must create conditions that promote open development and encourage the building of systems of “fair, reasonable and transparent global trade and investment rules”.

“Trade is the important engine of economic development,” he said.

He pointed out the world must promote the multilateral trade system, the establishment of free trade regions, and the facilitation of free trade.

Mr Xi also pledged a major funding boost to the new Silk Road, including an extra 100 billion yuan (S$20.3 billion) into the existing Silk Road Fund, 380 billion yuan in loans from two policy banks and 60 billion yuan in aid to developing countries and international bodies in nations along the new trade routes. In addition, Mr Xi said China would encourage financial institutions to expand their overseas yuan fund businesses to the tune of 300 billion yuan. He did not give a timeframe for the new loans, aid and funding pledged yesterday.

Leaders from 29 countries are attending the forum, as well as the heads of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund and World Bank.

Singapore is represented by Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong.

Britain’s Finance Minister told the summit his country was a “natural partner” in the new Silk Road, while Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a close Chinese ally, praised China’s “vision and ingenuity”.

White House adviser Matt Pottinger said the United States welcomed efforts by China to promote infrastructure connectivity as part of its Belt and Road initiative, and US companies could offer top value services.

China plans to import US$2 trillion of products from countries participating in its Belt and Road initiative over the next five years, said Commerce Minister Zhong Shan.

But some Western diplomats have expressed unease about both the summit and the plan as a whole, seeing it as an attempt to promote Chinese influence globally. They are also concerned about transparency and access for foreign firms to the scheme.

“China is willing to share its development experience with all countries. We will not interfere in other countries’ internal affairs. We will not export our system of society and development model, and even more will not impose our views on others,” said Mr Xi.

“In advancing the Belt and Road, we will not re-tread the old path of games between foes. Instead we will create a new model of cooperation and mutual benefit.”

Mr Xi also said the new Silk Road would be open to all, including Africa and the Americas, which are not situated on the traditional Silk Road.

The idea of cooperation and inclusiveness extends to funding projects and investments along the new trade routes, which are being developed both on land and at sea. It also includes cooperation on financial regulation, anti-terrorism and security.

“We should foster a vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security,” said Mr Xi, in calling for stepped-up action against terrorism and what he called its root causes of poverty and social injustice. AGENCIES

The World's New Super-Power & it's members gathers in Beijing today, all the rest go fly kite, awaiting starvation to death in bankruptcy.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Sg is going to be fucked thanks to Chinese dog pinky.
 

Goldcheekon

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Whether you like or dislike, the next 50 years belong to China. :p
 

rectmobile

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Whether you like or dislike, the next 50 years belong to China. :p

Yes, i agree to that. Do you think there will be a good outcome for China to lead economically, at least in Asia?
 
Last edited:

Goldcheekon

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Yes, i agree to that. Do you think it is a good outcome for China to lead economically, at least in Asia?

Economically, I believe it is fine. Politically, their rule of law has not reached a level where other developed countries like Japan and S Korea (or even Singapore) are comfortable with. Culturally, it is still a long way to go as they would probably need another 100 years to reach the level of graciousness of developed countries (as we are talking about more than 1 billion Chinese). While we can dissect these into compartments as we write, in reality, everything we see is somewhat get merge into a consolidated view of whether you like or dislike.

For me personally, I would prefer China to succeed.
 

kryonlight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Yes, i agree to that. Do you think there will be a good outcome for China to lead economically, at least in Asia?

Wait long long. The middle income trap will haunt China for decades. The US will be on the decline but not so fast as to be replaced by China. And not to mention that the US and China economies are intertwined. The real star to replace the US economy is actually the African Union which will take shape in the coming decades.

China must act fast to escape middle income trap

First, protection of private property rights can establish stable future profit expectations for entrepreneurs. Only in this way can long-term investment be encouraged. Protection of private property rights is a prerequisite for long-term investment in research and development, and the most effective way to protect property rights is to set up a sound legal system for it.

Second, the scope of the State-owned economy should be narrowed. State-owned enterprises seldom have pressure to be innovative, because there is little risk for them of going bankrupt. However, if private enterprises are lacking in innovation, they will go out of business.

Third, deregulation is needed. Excessive regulation is the biggest enemy of innovation. The reason why world-class Internet companies appeared in China is that when the Internet took off in the country, the government did not pay too much attention to it and did not try to restrain the industry. A free environment and flexible resources are vital for innovation.

Fourth, the government should implement across-the-board tax cuts. This would alleviate the burden on enterprises, and transfer resources from administrative coffers to the market for more autonomous allocation.

Will be very difficult for Communist China to tackle all the four points listed above in double quick time.
 

rectmobile

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Economically, I believe it is fine. Politically, their rule of law has not reached a level where other developed countries like Japan and S Korea (or even Singapore) are comfortable with. Culturally, it is still a long way to go as they would probably need another 100 years to reach the level of graciousness of developed countries (as we are talking about more than 1 billion Chinese). While we can dissect these into compartments as we write, in reality, everything we see is somewhat get merge into a consolidated view of whether you like or dislike.

For me personally, I would prefer China to succeed.

Their current level of graciousness will determine how they do business with other countries. Their aggressive investments in Johor Bahru reflects that very well. It gives me the impression of being less than gracious attitude in approaching this level of investment.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

is the french wine that is served at summit mixed with coke to turn it into china wine?
 

rectmobile

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Wait long long. The middle income trap will haunt China for decades. The US will be on the decline but not so fast as to be replaced by China. And not to mention that the US and China economies are intertwined. The real star to replace the US economy is actually the African Union which will take shape in the coming decades.

China must act fast to escape middle income trap

First, protection of private property rights can establish stable future profit expectations for entrepreneurs. Only in this way can long-term investment be encouraged. Protection of private property rights is a prerequisite for long-term investment in research and development, and the most effective way to protect property rights is to set up a sound legal system for it.

Second, the scope of the State-owned economy should be narrowed. State-owned enterprises seldom have pressure to be innovative, because there is little risk for them of going bankrupt. However, if private enterprises are lacking in innovation, they will go out of business.

Third, deregulation is needed. Excessive regulation is the biggest enemy of innovation. The reason why world-class Internet companies appeared in China is that when the Internet took off in the country, the government did not pay too much attention to it and did not try to restrain the industry. A free environment and flexible resources are vital for innovation.

Fourth, the government should implement across-the-board tax cuts. This would alleviate the burden on enterprises, and transfer resources from administrative coffers to the market for more autonomous allocation.

Will be very difficult for Communist China to tackle all the four points listed above in double quick time.

China's attitude in dealing with investment is very developing standard rather than developed. Having deep pockets allow them to do that without much grace. That is my impression of them.
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

China's attitude in dealing with investment is very developing standard rather than developed. Having deep pockets allow them to do that without much grace. That is my impression of them.

This is a classic example of Commie hypocrisy. They talk so much about free trade n yet imports to China have such high taxes...N USA has a deficit bcos the commies keep their economy closed..If not y no Facebook n Google? Banning is a violation of WTO rules.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

https://sammyboy.com/showthread.php...hinese-Trade-Boom-Time!&p=2603642#post2603642

The Xinhua official list outlined the TRUE members, SG is not True Member, SG is side lined because SG is Traitor 汉奸鸡败!







http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zyxw/t1454490.shtml


目前28个国家元首和政府首脑确认出席论坛,包括阿根廷马克里总统、白俄罗斯卢卡申科总统、智利巴切莱特总 统、捷克泽曼总统、印尼佐科总统、哈萨克斯坦纳扎尔巴耶夫总统、肯尼亚肯雅塔总统、老挝本扬国家主席、菲律 宾杜特尔特总统、俄罗斯普京总统、瑞士洛伊特哈德联邦主席、土耳其埃尔多安总统、乌兹别克斯坦米尔济约耶夫 总统、越南陈大光国家主席、柬埔寨洪森首相、埃塞俄比亚海尔马里亚姆总理、斐济姆拜尼马拉马总理、希腊齐普 拉斯总理、匈牙利欧尔班总理、意大利真蒂洛尼总理、马来西亚纳吉布总理、蒙古额尔登巴特总理、缅甸昂山素季 国务资政、巴基斯坦谢里夫总理、波兰谢德沃总理、塞尔维亚武契奇总理、西班牙拉霍伊首相、斯里兰卡维克拉马 辛哈总理。

 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

VietCong promised no stir shit @ South China Seas to be included into 1-Belt-1-Road Club:

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/a...ree-to-keep-south-china-sea-tensions-in-check

China, Vietnam Agree to Keep South China Sea Tensions in Check

May 15, 2017, at 2:08 a.m.
MORE


Reuters
An aerial view of uninhabited island of Spratlys in the disputed South China Sea, April 21, 2017. REUTERS/Erik De Castro REUTERS


BEIJING (Reuters) - China and Vietnam will manage and properly control their maritime disputes, avoiding actions to complicate or widen them, so as to maintain peace in the South China Sea, the two nations said in a joint communique China released on Monday.

Vietnam is the Southeast Asian country most openly at odds with China over the waterway since the Philippines pulled back from confrontation under President Rodrigo Duterte.

After what China said were "positive" talks on the South China Sea last week between President Xi Jinping and Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang, the joint statement stressed the need to control differences.

Both countries agreed to "manage and properly control maritime disputes, not take any actions to complicate the situation or expand the dispute, and maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea", it added.

The document, released by the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said both had a "candid and deep" exchange of views on maritime issues, and agreed to use an existing border talks mechanism to look for a lasting resolution.

China claims 90 percent of the potentially energy-rich South China Sea. Besides Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Taiwan lay claim to parts of the route, through which about $5 trillion of trade passes each year.

Last year, tension between Beijing and Hanoi rose after Taiwan and U.S. officials said China had placed surface-to-air missiles on Woody Island, part of the Paracels archipelago it controls.

Vietnam called China's actions a serious infringement of its sovereignty over the Paracels.

In 2014, tension between the two communist countries peaked more dramatically when China moved an oil rig into disputed waters and protests broke out across Vietnam.

Relations have gradually improved since, with exchanges of high-level visits, though the regional military buildup continues, including China's construction of airstrips on man-made islands in the busy waterway.

Quang arrived in Beijing last week for a state visit and to attend a two-day conference ending Monday on an ambitious scheme proposed by Xi to build a new Silk Road connecting China to Asia, Europe and beyond, through massive infrastructure investment.

(Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)

Copyright 2017 Thomson Reuters.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

The Chinese drawn line is quite clear, who in and out of the club:

@Ang Moh = Out, English Speaking Countries must die of starvation. French German Japs Hindi Tamil Negs too.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

The Chinese drawn line is quite clear, who in and out of the club:

@Ang Moh = Out, English Speaking Countries must die of starvation. French German Japs Hindi Tamil Negs too.

Chinese dogs are in deep trouble. USA isn't going to save their ass.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Chinese dogs are in deep trouble. USA isn't going to save their ass.

The only Real Goodness in this Xijinping Move is, sweeping away Ang Moh wealth and influence, and side line them deprive them from now on. So that, Stupid Ang Mohs can forget about further Ruin Planet Earth nor Flee Planet Earth After Ruined Earth.

Bad thing is, Chinese and Gang will Continue to Ruin Earth, Squandering Resources, and not long after Ang Mohs' perish, they will also follow. Only real difference made is Ang Moh dies first. Overall, the consumption of resources will be by a smaller number of nations, but squandered at expected higher speed.

In general, just a slightly better turn, from the existing situation.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: China drew a new line to divide between the future Rich Strong vs Weak Poor natio

Since when did Silk Road travel by sea? Just China securing resources from Central Asia and Africa. ASEAN states are just vassals, you kowtow to Eleven you get infrastructure investments and loans. America ties of no use to them, but us it is extreme important. So don't let ignorance people on the internet fool you into sucking chink schlong like Jah and some brown nosers here.
 
Top