• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat drama in sinkie starbucks as wife fights with man's alleged mistress

flatearther

Alfrescian
Loyal
China chinks wrecking havoc again!
Good job my fellow Chinese dog. We chinks wreck havoc.
‘Wreak havoc’ or ‘wreck havoc’? | OxfordWords blog
blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2016/01/wreak-havoc-wreck-havoc

"Do you know which one is correct?

English speakers often confuse ‘wreak havoc’ with ‘wreck havoc’. The confusion is more than understandable: both words are nearly homophones (they sound alike) and also are spelled with only a letter of difference. Part of the problem is the relative rarity of the verb wreak, as compared with the more common verb wreck.

The word wreak means ‘to cause or inflict’ and is usually paired with nouns meaning either ‘a large amount of damage or harm’ (as in wreak havoc or wreak devastation) or ‘vengeance’ (as in wreak revenge). Although it would sound somewhat archaic today, the word wreak can also be used alone, without an object, to mean ‘avenge’.

On the other hand, the verb form of the word wreck, means to ‘destroy or severely damage (a structure or vehicle)’ or ‘spoil completely’. (Wreck, of course, also has a noun form.) Because wreck does not have the sense of ‘cause’ or ‘inflict’ like wreak does, the phrase ‘wrecking havoc’ is illogical.
"
 

ChineseDog

Alfrescian
Loyal
‘Wreak havoc’ or ‘wreck havoc’? | OxfordWords blog
blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2016/01/wreak-havoc-wreck-havoc

"Do you know which one is correct?

English speakers often confuse ‘wreak havoc’ with ‘wreck havoc’. The confusion is more than understandable: both words are nearly homophones (they sound alike) and also are spelled with only a letter of difference. Part of the problem is the relative rarity of the verb wreak, as compared with the more common verb wreck.

The word wreak means ‘to cause or inflict’ and is usually paired with nouns meaning either ‘a large amount of damage or harm’ (as in wreak havoc or wreak devastation) or ‘vengeance’ (as in wreak revenge). Although it would sound somewhat archaic today, the word wreak can also be used alone, without an object, to mean ‘avenge’.

On the other hand, the verb form of the word wreck, means to ‘destroy or severely damage (a structure or vehicle)’ or ‘spoil completely’. (Wreck, of course, also has a noun form.) Because wreck does not have the sense of ‘cause’ or ‘inflict’ like wreak does, the phrase ‘wrecking havoc’ is illogical.
"


lowly Chinese dog you have no right to critique me:oIo:
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
And there are people who want China to lead the world. Seriously?

didn't know the fight of a few ppl represents the entire country and it leading the world. Following your logic why should US lead the world when there are so many fights in there involving all races of ppl including whites. :rolleyes:
 
Top