• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat 130,000-Year-Old Evidence of Humans in California

Faker

Alfrescian
Loyal
mastodon-bones-human-activity-1.jpg


http://www.livescience.com/58850-oldest-evidence-human-activity-north-america-photos.html[h=2]Broken bones[/h] Scientists have found what they are saying could be the oldest evidence of human activity in North America — the marked bones of a mastodon dating back some 130,000 years. The spiral fractures and other marks on the mastodon bones found in coastal San Diego County suggest they were processed while fresh, the researchers said. The findings, detailed in the journal Nature, suggest that a still-unknown hominin species was living in North America way before humans were thought to have arrived in the Americas. Here, fossil bones from a mastodon embedded in rock. The heads of the femurs are positioned with one up and one down, both broken in the same way — something the scientists said is unusual. Mastodon molars can be seen in the lower right-hand corner, near a broken vertebra. A mastodon rib bone can be seen in the upper left.
 

Faker

Alfrescian
Loyal
mastodon-bones-human-activity-6.jpg


[h=2]Beastly bones[/h] This mastodon skeleton illustration shows which bones and teeth of the beast were found at the site in San Diego.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Is the earth billions of years old or only 6000 years old as the Bible teaches?

Evolution is unproven science. It's full of holes too.

If humans came from Africa as claimed, then why were there more chinks than niggers from the beginning of time?

Ancient historical records show that even during the Spring & Autumn period in a very much smaller chinkland, there were already millions upon millions of chinks roaming around. In contrast, Africa didn't have that many niggers yet, and the Mesopotamia's population of sand niggers also weren't that big. I bet India also didn't have that many kelings too.

So, I say humans came from chinkland and moved west instead of the popular evolution theory that we all came from niggers who moved east.
 

Faker

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am very sure human existence is longer than 6000 or 10000 years. I am very sure human did not first come from dust as depicted in the Genesis.
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
Because man-eating lions ate most of the humans in Africa. And there also were lots of carnivorous animals like leopards, hyenas, crocodiles, and hungry bugs and snakes too! China in the past had lots of pandas, that ate only bamboo. Animals in China are lucky if the people didnt eat them. Opposite situation from the dark continent.

Cheers!

If humans came from Africa as claimed, then why were there more chinks than niggers from the beginning of time?
 

Victory2016

Alfrescian
Loyal
Evidence of some other species of humanoids but not modern humans.
Modern humans (Homo Sapiens) moved to the American continent only about 10,000 years ago
 
Top