• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Good Young Couple Trashes Pioneer Over Hawker Centre Table Choping!

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Hopefully they get the maximum sentencing

A Singapore overcrowded by Greedy PAP is the root cause of this.
People can't even find a seat to have a meal peacefully.

Agree! People are jostling for space on the roads, in the trains, in the hawker centres and elsewhere fighting for a place in the queue
be it for goodies handouts, HDB flat applications, job applications and what nots.

Hoot for everything!:biggrin:
 

Blazars

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Toa Payoh high class eat cheap couple kenna charged liao!

What is the charge? He scolded the man and pushed him?
 

Annunaki

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Hopefully they get the maximum sentencing

The guy got a real cheebye face that is presumed guilty until Proven Innocent.
 

bushtucker

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Hopefully they get the maximum sentencing

that couple really fits the bill of ugly sinkie. Ugly on the inside and outside. :(
 

rambo22

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Hopefully they get the maximum sentencing

curry nah both age add up close to 100 yo

still behave like a 18 yo kids

super xia suay

face smart smart

but tao nao pai
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Couple who bullied elderly man over seat at Toa Payoh hawker centre gets charged in court

From MSN News

The biggest contenders for Singaporean A******s of the Year award are finally being dragged to court to face the music over a very ugly, highly viral spat with an elderly man at a Toa Payoh hawker centre. Yeah, that one.

45-year-old Chow Chin Yee and his 38-year-old wife Tay Puay Leng were charged in court today — a few months since both of them were seen arguing with 76-year-old Ng Ai Hua over the use of a table. Singapore got shooketh after they witnessed the couple publicly bullying the elder man over a choped table on Apr 21, with Chow seen shoving Ng from behind.

But justice comes for all, and they were soon arrested after police reports were made about the couple. In court, Chow is accused of using criminal force by using his body to barge against Ng, as well as behaving in a disorderly manner by pushing bowls and plates off the table when he was confronted. Tay was charged with using abusive words against Ng, with the intent to cause alarm.

The couple’s lawyer have asked for time to make representations, and the two will return to court on July 12. If convicted, Tay could face a fine of up to $5,000 and/or up to six months in jail. Chow on the other hand could face up to nine months in jail and fines up to $3,500 in total for both his charges.

This should put to rest all the misguided attempts led by online vigilantes, who went ballistic in their hunt for the identities of the couple after the video went viral. The wrong parties were mistakenly outed, to no one’s surprise. Lianhe Wanbao however managed to find out more about Chow from his own neighbours, who assured the paper that yes, he really is a textbook t**t.
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
When are they charging this whore by slicing off her nipples., dig out her eyes and drown her in acid.

[video=youtube;z6HDhLXcqTE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6HDhLXcqTE[/video]
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Probably because this case lacked the publicity of the hawker centre couple (nobody complained) and there was no physical assault on a victim. The hawker centre case is one involving bullying whereas the mrt case is one involving arguing. :biggrin:

let's ignore the case of bodily assault for now and focus on just verbal vulgarities spewed by sinkies and foreign trash every day. how cum not all get charged? must it be accompanied by physical assault to make it a chargeable offense? i'm confused. what about verbal abuse and vaginal vulgarities here? not counted?
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
I think that the wife was included because she clearly said something inflammatory over the phone to her husband, which made him rush over and shove the old man. Subsequently, she may have continued the abuse to incite him further. If it was just a shouting match between her and the old man, the outcome would probably be the same as your mrt case. (or other verbal abuse and vaginal vulgarity cases)

let's ignore the case of bodily assault for now and focus on just verbal vulgarities spewed by sinkies and foreign trash every day. how cum not all get charged? must it be accompanied by physical assault to make it a chargeable offense? i'm confused. what about verbal abuse and vaginal vulgarities here? not counted?
 
Top