The stupidity of the idiots thinking socialism is great ought to go live in Venezuela.
What's Wrong with Socialism?
[video=youtube;WCUq0V-3mgo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCUq0V-3mgo[/video]
THIS is National Socialism.
[video=youtube;t0LQgXclado]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0LQgXclado[/video]
National Socialism is the best.
Selflessness, commitment and HONESTY are important for any leadership/ political system to work.
Socialism(Communism) is morally premised upon leaders who direct help towards the infirm, poor sick but usually, the promise is just a false(fake) promise to win people's support/vote (Hitler promised to step down after 4 yrs in the video but I believe he stayed till he committed cowardly suicide because Berlin was being invaded by Russians whom Hitler had invaded (waged war against) in the first place).
Democracy (Capitalism) is morally premised upon people individually helping each other with lesser gahmen intervention unless instructed so (regular elections to select the best leader for a pre-determined office term): without any implicit grand promise of care for the sick/ poor due to the overarching focus on the masses to select honest and upright men/women for the job.
Socialism(communism) whilst being the most ostentatiously moral in its propaganda slogans however has the serious flaw of bestowing absolute authority on its figurehead(leader) (N Korea (communism), Hitler(national socialism)).
Democracy however makes no such explicit moral promise except to assume implicitly the people can be trusted to elect the most honest and capable person for the good of creation/ the entire society or at least come to some respectable(acceptable) compromise.
Somehow or other, democracy (capitalism directed socialism)(USA, UK) seems to have stood the test of time maybe due to its being more realistic (u cannot spend what u don't already have: u cannot promise to give away what u don't already own). Politicians in democratic countries are also more measured because they know that they will either definitely leave office (USA presidents) or face re-election every few years (U.K. Parliament). Capitalism also ensures that every cent is accounted for @ basic level since $ is king and no cent can be allowed to go unaccounted.
Guess as they say, the people deserve the gahmen that they have elected: honestly and morality can exist BOTH in administrative as well as political slogan forms: however as history to date has shown, despotism with empty talk (communism) has resulted in the worst result. Where power is shared and measured (democracy): the gaps between classes seem to date less obvious. However, in all cases, the devil is always in the details. Communist China now seems to be thriving because the gahmen focused upon social development (serving the people, eliminating corrupt comrades), eschewing corruption associated with autocracy. S Korea (Park in jail) , USA(Clinton defeat), UK vs Euro(Brexit) (all democracies) are on the mend without too much bloodshed so long as politicians continue to work for the people rather than personal self interest and there exists sufficiently trust in society between communities so that civil war does not break out.
