• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious PAP high com HHH is fake1

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not sure her news is fake, but she's real ugly for a woman.

redwire-singapore-han-hui-hui-return-our-cpf.jpg
 

fupikee

Alfrescian
Loyal
she needs cosmetic surgery from head to toe.

Don't under rate H3...after all patricia mok, o levels only, could fake it through the teevee media....what more a graduate?

The best is yet to be...watch out for next histrionics of H3....esp when elections is around the corner.....
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Don't under rate H3...after all patricia mok, o levels only, could fake it through the teevee media....what more a graduate?

The best is yet to be...watch out for next histrionics of H3....esp when elections is around the corner.....

even that bitch was barely tolerable let alone this bitch.this one is striaght up malaysian pain in the neck.

why is it singapore always attract all the ugly and crazy bitches?can we have some sexy french or jap loli for once?

these two bitches should have a ugly showdown like one of those marvel vs avengers movies.
 

Annunaki

Alfrescian
Loyal
Another opportunity for siao cheebye han hui hui and her two siao Lang followers Ivan Koh and Janet Low to ask for donations

IMG_8120.JPG

IMG_8124.JPG

IMG_8116.JPG
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Some of my friends whose special needs children were traumatized by HHH are thinking of suing her for compensation and a public apology. We are expecting HHH to throw a 9 course chink dinner and apologize by offering up a toast of whisky. Preferably, she should also perform the 3 bows and 9 kowtows ritual.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.economist.com/news/asia/...ing-public-order-government-singapore-says-it

LIKE most constitutions, Singapore’s promises freedom of speech. Unlike most, it allows the government to limit that freedom with “such restrictions as it considers necessary or expedient” to maintain national security, friendly relations with other countries or public order and morality, as well as to protect “the privileges of Parliament” and to prevent “contempt of court” or “incitement to any offence”. Officials have not hesitated to quell their critics. Opponents of the People’s Action Party (PAP), which has ruled Singapore without interruption since independence, have often found themselves on the losing end of defamation suits regarding accusations that American or European politicians would have shrugged or laughed off.

Singapore’s government has long insisted that such measures are essential to safeguard the country’s hard-won racial harmony and public order. Recently, however, the country’s rulers have begun expounding the virtues of thick skins. In late February Lee Hsien Loong, the prime minister, said leaders need to be challenged: “If all you have are people who say, ‘Three bags full, sir’, then soon you start to believe them, and that is disastrous.” On the very same day Kishore Mahbubani, a former diplomat who runs a public-policy institute at the National University of Singapore, said that Singapore needed “more naysayers [who] attack and challenge every sacred cow”. Tommy Koh, another diplomat, urged his countrymen to prize “challengers who are subversive and who have alternate points of view”.
Latest updates


These comments were presumably not intended as a criticism of the Supreme Court. Just two days before it had upheld the conviction and fining of three activists who took part in a protest about the management of the Central Provident Fund, a compulsory savings scheme administered by the government. The three had been marching in Hong Lim Park, home to Speakers’ Corner (pictured), a spot set up for Singaporeans to exercise their freedom of speech without any restriction whatsoever, beyond the obligation to apply for permission to speak and to comply with the 13 pages of terms and conditions upon which such permissions are predicated, as well as all the relevant laws and constitutional clauses.

The three protesters were convicted of creating a public nuisance, for disrupting a public event being held in the park. One of them, Han Hui Hui, who ran for parliament as an independent in 2015, was also convicted of organising a public protest without approval (the authorities said she had applied to give a speech rather than a demonstration). The courts fined Ms Han S$3,100 ($2,199). Anyone convicted and fined more than S$2,000 is barred from becoming a member of parliament for five years—another restriction the authorities must still deem necessary or expedient for the maintenance of something or other.

The upholding of Ms Han’s conviction comes six months after Singapore’s parliament enacted a law stiffening the penalties for contempt of court, to as much as three years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to S$100,000. The law defines contempt broadly: any comment that, in the court’s judgment, “poses a risk that public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined”. If the prime minister wants to encourage criticism of the government, making more of it legal would be a good first step.
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
Some of my friends whose special needs children were traumatized by HHH are thinking of suing her for compensation and a public apology. We are expecting HHH to throw a 9 course chink dinner and apologize by offering up a toast of whisky. Preferably, she should also perform the 3 bows and 9 kowtows ritual.

Sir John! Please issue this skinny bitch a summon, her nipples need to be clamped.
 

Semaj2357

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
even that bitch was barely tolerable let alone this bitch.this one is striaght up malaysian pain in the neck. why is it singapore always attract all the ugly and crazy bitches?can we have some sexy french or jap loli for once?.......
i mean, what's there to attract these loverlies here :confused:
sinkie men aren't god's gift to women and after they ord with the kkk syndrome - ns are killing the very few left :(
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP classic reply:



SINGAPORE: Singapore's High Commissioner to the UK Foo Chi Hsia has responded to a recent article in The Economist alleging restrictions on free speech in Singapore.

Ms Foo said no country gives an absolute right to free speech. "When this right is extended to fake news, defamation or hate speech, society pays a price," she wrote in a letter to the UK-based weekly, citing the Brexit campaign and elections in the US and Europe.

"Trust in leaders and institutions, including journalists and the media, has been gravely undermined, as have these democracies," she added. "In contrast, international polls show that Singaporeans trust their government, judiciary, police and even media."

The article in The Economist, titled Grumble and be Damned, alleged that while the Singapore Government has said it welcomes criticism, its critics still suffer.

Specifically, the article cited the case of blogger Han Hui Hui and two other activists who were involved in a protest over the management of the Central Provident Fund (CPF) at the Speakers' Corner in 2014.

In response, Ms Foo said: "They were not charged for criticising the government, but for loutishly barging into a performance by a group of special-education-needs children, frightening them and denying them the right to be heard."

Ms Han, 24, was found guilty and fined S$3,100 last June for disrupting the charity event for special needs children at the Speakers' Corner at Hong Lim Park, by leading the rowdy protest which she organised without approval from the National Parks Board.

In her letter published in the magazine's Mar 18 issue, Ms Foo argued that Singaporeans have free access to information and the Internet, including to The Economist.

"We do not stifle criticism of the government. But we will not allow our judiciary to be denigrated under the cover of free speech, nor will we protect hate or libellous speech," she wrote. "People can go to court to defend their integrity and correct falsehoods purveyed against them. Opposition politicians have done this, successfully."

"In no country is the right to free speech absolute," she concluded. "Singapore does not claim to be an example for others, but we do ask to be allowed to work out a system that is best for ourselves."
 
Top