• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat My HERO PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
[video=youtube_share;hBUk8Mu1gFA]https://youtu.be/hBUk8Mu1gFA[/video]
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
tis kind of speech hear oredi make u feel gud ...

u kinda wanna put ur hand in2 ur pocket 2 take out ur wallet 2 buy dat beaming rooking 2nd hand car ...

but actuarry say oredi like no say lidat ...
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
This is my heroine. :biggrin:

ivanka-trump-in-bandeau-satin-dress-person-photo-u1.jpg
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
your hero is another puppet of the jews
IS THERE A POWER, A FORCE OR A GROUP OF MEN ORGANIZING AND REDIRECTING CHANGE?

1969
The speaker was a doctor of medicine, a former professor at a large Eastern university.
In his introductory remarks he commented that he was free to speak at this time because now,
"everything is in place and nobody can stop us now."

"Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people;
and second, is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it."


he soken about :
POPULATION CONTROL
ENCOURAGING HOMOSEXUALITY. SEX, ANYTHING GOES
Homosexuality also was to be encouraged. "People will be given permission to be homosexual."
SEX EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF WORLD GOVERNMENT
Clothing styles would be made more stimulating and provocative.
Recall back in 1969 was the time of the mini skirt, when those mini- skirts were very, very high and revealing.
He said, "It is not just the amount of skin that is exposed that makes clothing sexually seductive, but other,
more subtle things are often suggestive."
FAMILIES TO DIMINISH IN IMPORTANCE
NEW DIFFICULT TO DIAGNOSE AND UNTREATABLE DISEASES
He said there would be new diseases to appear which had not ever been seen before.
Would be very difficult to diagnose and be untreatable — at least for a long time.
SUPPRESSING CANCER CURES
He said, "We can cure almost every cancer right now. Information is on file in the Rockefeller Institute,
if it's ever decided that it should be released.
But consider - if people stop dying of cancer, how rapidly we would become overpopulated.
You may as well die of cancer as something else."
RESTRUCTURING EDUCATION AS A TOOL OF INDOCTRINATION
As regards education, he indicated that kids would spend more time in schools,
but in many schools they wouldn't learn anything. They'll learn some things, but not as much as formerly.
Better schools in better areas with better people – their kids will learn more. In the better schools,
learning would be accelerated. And this is another time where he said, "We think we can push evolution."
CHANGING LAWS
ENCOURAGEMENT OF DRUG ABUSE TO CREATE A JUNGLE ATMOSPHERE
 

Bonut

Alfrescian
Loyal
I like the part when Trump pointed to his wife in the audience - the First Lady of the United States of America.
 

melzp

Alfrescian
Loyal
A person is truthful to what he say without the scriptwriters.
Unlike Bush who had to dodge the shoe.
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
I like the part when Trump pointed to his wife in the audience - the First Lady of the United States of America.
His wife doesn't seem to be pleased with her status, Every time see her with the "black" face and even if she does smiles, it looks so faked, like being forced out reluctantly. She also excused herself from hosting Abe's wife during their last visit and the Japanese embassy staff had to do that job instead.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have no doubt that Obama's 2 daughters must be wondering what their father has been doing for the last 8 years. If Trump completes 20% of what he promised, it would be quite a feat.
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal

Donald Trump fact check: Almost every big claim he made in his Joint Address to Congress was false


Wednesday 1 March 2017 05:03 GMT
Donald Trump has completed his first ever speech to Congress as President. And almost every major claim made in it appeared to be false.

He appeared to wrongly claim that he was responsible for a vast reduction in the price of the F-35 jet, as well as falsely characterising a report into the problems of immigration.

The President's speech made contested claims about the value of immigration, his success in office, his plans for tax reform, and healthcare coverage.

While much of the speech was focused on the same rhetoric that Mr Trump led his campaign with – including a commitment to bring jobs back to the US and boost the military – he also made a number of factual claims about his work as president.

The controversial orders Donald Trump has already issued

Here are some of those false claims in full, as fact checked by the Associated Press.

———

TRUMP: "According to the National Academy of Sciences, our current immigration system costs America's taxpayers many billions of dollars a year."

THE FACTS: That's not exactly what that report says. It says immigrants "contribute to government finances by paying taxes and add expenditures by consuming public services."

The report found that while first-generation immigrants are more expensive to governments than their native-born counterparts, primarily at the state and local level, immigrants' children "are among the strongest economic and fiscal contributors in the population."

The report found that the "long-run fiscal impact" of immigrants and their children would probably be seen as more positive "if their role in sustaining labor force growth and contributing to innovation and entrepreneurial activity were taken into account."

———

TRUMP: "We've saved taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars by bringing down the price" of the F-35 jet fighter.

THE FACTS: The cost savings he persists in bragging about were secured in full or large part before he became president.

The head of the Air Force program announced significant price reductions in the contract for the Lockheed F-35 fighter jet Dec. 19 — after Trump had tweeted about the cost but weeks before he met the company's CEO about it.

Pentagon managers took action even before the election to save money on the contract. Richard Aboulafia, an analyst with the aerospace consulting firm Teal Group, said there is no evidence of any additional cost savings as a result of Trump's actions.

———

TRUMP: "We will provide massive tax relief for the middle class."

THE FACTS: Trump has provided little detail on how this would happen. Independent analyses of his campaign's tax proposals found that most of the benefits would flow to the wealthiest families. The richest 1 percent would see an average tax cut of nearly $215,000 a year, while the middle one-fifth of the population would get a cut of just $1,010, according to the Tax Policy Center, a joint project by the Brookings Institution and Urban Institute.

———

TRUMP: "Ninety-four million Americans are out of the labor force."

THE FACTS: That's true, but for the vast majority of them, it's because they choose to be.

That 94 million figure includes everyone aged 16 and older who doesn't have a job and isn't looking for one. So it includes retirees, parents who are staying home to raise children, and high school and college students who are studying rather than working.

They are unlikely to work regardless of the state of the economy. With the huge baby-boomer generation reaching retirement age and many of them retiring, the population of those out of the labor force is increasing and will continue to do so, most economists forecast.

It's true that some of those out of the workforce are of working age and have given up looking for work. But that number is probably a small fraction of the 94 million Trump cited.

———

TRUMP: "Obamacare is collapsing ... imploding Obamacare disaster."

THE FACTS: There are problems with the 2010 health care law, but whether it's collapsing is hotly disputed.

One of the two major components of the Affordable Care Act has seen a spike in premiums and a drop in participation from insurers. But the other component, equally important, seems to be working fairly well, even if its costs are a concern.

Trump and congressional Republicans want to repeal the whole thing, which risks leaving millions of people uninsured if the replacement plan has shortcomings. Some critics say GOP rhetoric itself is making things worse by creating uncertainty about the future.

The health law offers subsidized private health insurance along with a state option to expand Medicaid for low-income people. Together, the two arms of the program cover more than 20 million people.

Republican governors whose states have expanded Medicaid are trying to find a way to persuade Congress and the administration to keep the expansion, and maybe even build on it, while imposing limits on the long-term costs of Medicaid.

While the Medicaid expansion seems to be working, the markets for subsidized private health insurance are stressed in many states. Also affected are millions of people who buy individual policies outside the government markets, and face the same high premiums with no financial help from the health law.

Larry Levitt of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation says "implosion" is too strong a term. An AP count found that 12.2 million people signed up for this year, despite the Trump administration's threats to repeal the law.

But a health care blogger and industry consultant, Robert Laszewski, agrees with Trump, saying too few young, healthy people have signed up to guarantee the stability of the insurance markets.

———

TRUMP: His budget plan will offer "one of the largest increases in national defence spending in American history".

THE FACTS: Three times in recent years, Congress raised defence budgets by larger percentages than the 54 billion dollars, or 10%, increase Mr Trump proposes. The base defense budget grew by 41 billion dollars, or 14.3%, in 2002; by 37 billion dollars, or 11.3%, in 2003, and by 47 billion dollars, or 10.9%, in 2008, according to Defence Department figures.

———

TRUMP: "According to data provided by the Department of Justice, the vast majority of individuals convicted for terrorism-related offences since 9/11 came here from outside of our country. We have seen the attacks at home - from Boston to San Bernardino to the Pentagon and yes, even the World Trade Centre."

THE FACTS: It is unclear what Justice Department data he's citing, but the most recent government information does not back up his claim. Just over half the people Mr Trump talks about were born in the US, according to Homeland Security Department research revealed last week. That report said of 82 people the government determined were inspired by a foreign terrorist group to attempt or carry out an attack in the US, just over half were native-born.

Even the attacks Mr Trump singled out were not entirely the work of foreigners. Syed Rizwan Farook, who along with his Pakistani wife killed 14 people in the 2015 attack in San Bernardino, California, was born in Chicago.

It is true that in the immediate aftermath of September 11, the FBI's primary concern was with terrorists from overseas feared to be plotting attacks in the US, but that is no longer the case.

The FBI and the Justice Department have been preoccupied with violent extremists from inside the US who are inspired by the calls to violence and mayhem of the Islamic State group. The Justice Department has prosecuted scores of IS-related cases since 2014, and many of the defendants are US citizens.

Additional reporting by Associated Press
 
Last edited:

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have no doubt that Obama's 2 daughters must be wondering what their father has been doing for the last 8 years. If Trump completes 20% of what he promised, it would be quite a feat.

It is still early - let's see how much Trump achieves in reality. It is a country of 320million people not 3 million citizens who fear the government. If he thought it was like his reality show where he says and his people do, he is been sadly mistaken.

Obama was frustrated at every turn by the Republicans - the fact that they refused to engage on the replacement for the Supreme Court bench shows how broken the system is. If Trump can simply tear up the Affordable Care Act let's see how he makes it better.

His speech today is reminiscent of motherhood statements aplenty and the sight of Republicans standing up to applaud every such statement is marginally more embarrassing then the local IB immediately launching into attack mode for anyone who challenges the government's ideas.

Its quite convenient to criticise from a distance but the mechanics of democracy on that scale is quite hard to grasp unless you are an active political participant. Just look at how many heroes joined up and promised to change our own ruling party "from within" only to get crushed by reality.

One of the most startling aspect of Trump is that he keeps lying/being economical with the truth and just keeps on going and going - its almost as if he hopes that by telling the lie often enough they will become the truth.

And his desire to go after Iran (at the urging of Saudi Arabia and Israel) is not a good omen at all. One shudders to think what the ripple effect across the region and wider will be. The ideology of ISIS is adapted from the Saudi Wahhabism not the Iranians yet he conveniently glosses over that. The many acts of terrorism that have occurred most recently are Muslims who are Salafist Sunni - not Shia/Iranian. Yet he is convinced the Iranians need to be pummelled.
 
Last edited:

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I do agree that it is still early and his first month in office has been a disaster but he is quiet bold on offering material change and he lists them. Obama was politically correct both in his speeches and his actions. So the contrast to the common man is quite startling. At the end of day if Trump fails it would not surprise anyone. And I suspect it is not Trump per se but any entity that was going to operate differently that became appealing to the voters.


I always felt that the American model is fundamentally flawed. The ability to cripple an elected President voted by the people (albeit by the electoral college) 6 out of 8 years is beyond ridiculous.

It is still early - let's see how much Trump achieves in reality. It is a country of 320million people not 3 million citizens who fear the government. If he thought it was like his reality show where he says and his people do, he is been sadly mistaken.

Obama was frustrated at every turn by the Republicans - the fact that they refused to engage on the replacement for the Supreme Court bench shows how broken the system is. If Trump can simply tear up the Affordable Care Act let's see how he makes it better.

His speech today is reminiscent of motherhood statements aplenty and the sight of Republicans standing up to applaud every such statement is marginally more embarrassing then the local IB immediately launching into attack mode for anyone who challenges the government's ideas.

Its quite convenient to criticise from a distance but the mechanics of democracy on that scale is quite hard to grasp unless you are an active political participant. Just look at how many heroes joined up and promised to change our own ruling party "from within" only to get crushed by reality.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
This time around, Republicans hold sway in both Senate and Congress, so he should have greater chance of getting his way.

By and large, I think his speech will be a great unifier. He is not our conventional politician, so let's watch him. I am sure he will make a great President! He calls a spade a spade. That's a good beginning.
 
Top