-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Corrupt Hillary Clinton's health is a serious concern!
- Thread starter soikee
- Start date
You take right-wing propaganda and state that as proof. No wonder you sleep with Trump.
Washington (CNN) — Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton start the race to November 8 on essentially even ground, with Trump edging Clinton by a scant two points among likely voters,
and the contest sparking sharp divisions along demographic lines in a new CNN/ORC Poll.
Trump tops Clinton 45% to 43% in the new survey, with Libertarian Gary Johnson standing at 7% among likely voters in this poll and the Green Party's Jill Stein at just 2%.
and the contest sparking sharp divisions along demographic lines in a new CNN/ORC Poll.
Trump tops Clinton 45% to 43% in the new survey, with Libertarian Gary Johnson standing at 7% among likely voters in this poll and the Green Party's Jill Stein at just 2%.
America's most dishonest & corrupt old lesbian had a second coughing fit on the same day during her press conference on her plane:
[video=youtube;CJdOkPES7dA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJdOkPES7dA[/video]
She has been coughing for years.
Good chance that Trump wins the Nov presidential election with his tough stand on immigration policy.
Look at what is happening to Angela Merkel's huge defeat to the right wing party two days ago.
'I'm very unhappy' Angela Merkel admits open-door policy DID cause defeat by far-right
Angela Merkel has admitted her hated open door policy on migrants led to her party’s crushing defeat in this weekend’s elections.
Tues Sep 6, 2016
Mrs Merkel’s CDU party was beaten into third place by the right wing Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party in her home state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
CDU could muster only a pitiful 19.2 per cent of the vote compared to the victorious AfD's 21 per cent, leading to growing scepticism about Merkel's ability to cling onto power in Germany after her party also lost three elections to the AfD in March.
Angela Merkel admits immigrant policy cause election defeat.
Merkel’s CDU party DESTROYED in German election by ANTI-MIGRANT party.
Today at the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, Mrs Merkel conceded the open door policy to migrants had swayed the election but added that she considered the "fundamental decisions" of the refugee policy were correct.
She said the outcome of the state election stands for itself and added: "We must take note that people do not have sufficient confidence in our solution competences. That is why the task is to now work hard to restore confidence. We need to show that we will solve the problems.
Voters made a clear statement against Merkel's disastrous immigration policies
"Everyone has to think about how we can regain confidence - especially myself.
“I think the fundamental decisions of recent months were correct, but we still have a lot to do."
"I am very unhappy. The CDU can not reap the fruits because the election campaign was almost exclusively about the issues of federal policy".
After the AfD win, the party leader Frauke Petry said: "We have made history here today.
"This is a slap in the face for Merkel - not only in Berlin but also in her home state. The voters made a clear statement against Merkel's disastrous immigration policies. This put her in her place."
Germany's Jewish leaders have reacted with horror to the success of the AfD in the weeken election in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.
“That an extreme-right party which blatantly incites hatred against minorities in a disgusting way can rise unhindered in our country is a nightmare come true,” said Charlotte Knobloch, President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria.
“The AfD is an openly far-right party. It is pathetic when a party - in which xenophobia, antisemitism, racism, homophobia, historical denialism and conspiracy theories are the basis for argument - can become such a strong social and political influence.”
Knobloch warned that, in collaboration with other far-right parties, the AfD had the strength to threaten Germany’s democratic foundations.
Josef Schuster, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, also expressed concern saying: "Clearly many voters are not aware or play down the fact that the AfD do not clearly distance themselves from right-wing extremists, in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania or anywhere else in the country."
AfD party leader Frauke Petry announced that “Merkel has brought herself down," adding: "The Chancellor and the SPD are leading German citizens on, whether it be in the financial crisis or the refugee crisis. The main political parties are involved in surrendering this country."
Good chance that Trump wins the Nov presidential election with his tough stand on immigration policy.
Look at what is happening to Angela Merkel's huge defeat to the right wing party two days ago.
'I'm very unhappy' Angela Merkel admits open-door policy DID cause defeat by far-right
Angela Merkel has admitted her hated open door policy on migrants led to her party’s crushing defeat in this weekend’s elections.
Tues Sep 6, 2016
Mrs Merkel’s CDU party was beaten into third place by the right wing Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party in her home state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
CDU could muster only a pitiful 19.2 per cent of the vote compared to the victorious AfD's 21 per cent, leading to growing scepticism about Merkel's ability to cling onto power in Germany after her party also lost three elections to the AfD in March.
Angela Merkel admits immigrant policy cause election defeat.
Merkel’s CDU party DESTROYED in German election by ANTI-MIGRANT party.
Today at the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, Mrs Merkel conceded the open door policy to migrants had swayed the election but added that she considered the "fundamental decisions" of the refugee policy were correct.
She said the outcome of the state election stands for itself and added: "We must take note that people do not have sufficient confidence in our solution competences. That is why the task is to now work hard to restore confidence. We need to show that we will solve the problems.
Voters made a clear statement against Merkel's disastrous immigration policies
"Everyone has to think about how we can regain confidence - especially myself.
“I think the fundamental decisions of recent months were correct, but we still have a lot to do."
"I am very unhappy. The CDU can not reap the fruits because the election campaign was almost exclusively about the issues of federal policy".
After the AfD win, the party leader Frauke Petry said: "We have made history here today.
"This is a slap in the face for Merkel - not only in Berlin but also in her home state. The voters made a clear statement against Merkel's disastrous immigration policies. This put her in her place."
Germany's Jewish leaders have reacted with horror to the success of the AfD in the weeken election in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.
“That an extreme-right party which blatantly incites hatred against minorities in a disgusting way can rise unhindered in our country is a nightmare come true,” said Charlotte Knobloch, President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria.
“The AfD is an openly far-right party. It is pathetic when a party - in which xenophobia, antisemitism, racism, homophobia, historical denialism and conspiracy theories are the basis for argument - can become such a strong social and political influence.”
Knobloch warned that, in collaboration with other far-right parties, the AfD had the strength to threaten Germany’s democratic foundations.
Josef Schuster, President of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, also expressed concern saying: "Clearly many voters are not aware or play down the fact that the AfD do not clearly distance themselves from right-wing extremists, in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania or anywhere else in the country."
AfD party leader Frauke Petry announced that “Merkel has brought herself down," adding: "The Chancellor and the SPD are leading German citizens on, whether it be in the financial crisis or the refugee crisis. The main political parties are involved in surrendering this country."
These refugees screwed themselves. They got taken in and then create troubles. Next time, these refugees can rot in hell. No country would want to take them in.
If you want checks and balances, vote Trump
Glenn Harlan Reynolds
September 9, 2016
The civil service, though supposedly professional and nonpartisan, has become a Democratic Party monoculture.
So I’ve made no secret of being unhappy with my choices in this presidential election, a feeling that I share with most voters, judging by the polls.
Trump is a blowhard who seems to have something of a man-crush on Vladimir Putin. His business dealings are as shady as you’d expect a New York real-estate developer’s to be, his campaign has been a madhouse, and even on the positions of his that I like, I don’t have a whole lot of confidence that he’ll actually deliver.
Hillary, on the other hand is, well, a crook. Her period at the State Department was marked by pretty much out-and-out influence peddling, the Clinton Foundation seems to be little more than a money laundry, and when she’s asked to explain herself, she sounds like a Mafia boss’s lawyer, only less believable.
I could vote third-party of course, as I have in the past, but that’s not super-appealing either. I would ordinarily lean toward the Libertarian ticket, featuring former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson and former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld, but their positions on a lot of issues I care about aren’t especially libertarian — Weld on Second Amendment rights sounds, well, like a Massachusetts governor, and Johnson seems to care more about marijuana rights than religious freedom. Besides, it’s hard to see them carrying a single state.
The quixotic candidacy of Evan McMullin, backed by some “NeverTrump” Republicans, seems even less likely to accomplish anything (except maybe keep some consultants employed). And I interviewed Green Party nominee Jill Stein last election cycle and she’s a nice lady, but her chances look even poorer, and her outright-socialist platform would be a disaster in the unlikely event she won.
So what to do? Well, the answer to me comes from a column by Bill McGurn in the Wall Street Journal, noting that the worst scandal in Hillary’s email scandal isn’t what Hillary did — we expect her to act like a crook — but rather that the supposedly professional, nonpartisan civil service rolled over for her, and even offered cover. As McGurn writes:
Even today her former department is still resisting efforts to make public the emails she tried to hide. Groups such as Judicial Watch have done yeoman’s work in forcing the emails into the sunlight—but they have also had to get court orders to pry them out of an obstructionist State Department.
It’s a disturbing pattern, and unfortunately it’s not limited to State. There have been similar questions about the integrity and professionalism of the IRS ever since the American people learned in 2013 that it was unfairly targeting conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.
Three years, many congressional hearings and disappearing hard drives later, there is still no evidence the IRS has ended the practice.
And the FBI and Department of Justice have seemed curiously uninterested in going after people for behavior that, in other circumstances, would be a surefire ticket to federal prison.
The reason, of course, is that the civil service, though supposedly professional and nonpartisan, has become a Democratic Party monoculture. Federal employees overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, donate to Democrats, and, by all appearances, cover for Democrats as a routine part of doing their job.
When Richard Nixon tried to weaponize the IRS, top officials at the Service made a stink. Under Obama, the IRS weaponized itself.
And, of course, the press is in the tank for the Democrats as usual. Bad news about Obama and Clinton has been soft-pedaled, with reporters sometimes admitting that they don’t want to help Trump.
So if the choice in 2016 is between one bad candidate and another (and it is) the question is, which one will do the least harm. And, judging by the civil service’s behavior, that’s got to be Trump. If Trump tries to target his enemies with the IRS, you can bet that he’ll get a lot of pushback — and the press, instead of explaining it away, will make a huge stink. If Trump engages in influence-peddling, or abuses secrecy laws, you can bet that, even if Trump’s appointees sit atop the DOJ or FBI, the civil service will ensure that things don’t get swept under the rug. And if Trump wants to go to war, he’ll get far more scrutiny than Hillary will get — or, in cases like her disastrous Libya invasion, has gotten.
So the message is clear. If you want good government, vote for Trump — he’s the only one who will make this whole checks-and-balances thing work.
Glenn Reynolds is a law professor at the University of Tennessee & the author of The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself & he is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors.
Glenn Harlan Reynolds
September 9, 2016
The civil service, though supposedly professional and nonpartisan, has become a Democratic Party monoculture.
So I’ve made no secret of being unhappy with my choices in this presidential election, a feeling that I share with most voters, judging by the polls.
Trump is a blowhard who seems to have something of a man-crush on Vladimir Putin. His business dealings are as shady as you’d expect a New York real-estate developer’s to be, his campaign has been a madhouse, and even on the positions of his that I like, I don’t have a whole lot of confidence that he’ll actually deliver.
Hillary, on the other hand is, well, a crook. Her period at the State Department was marked by pretty much out-and-out influence peddling, the Clinton Foundation seems to be little more than a money laundry, and when she’s asked to explain herself, she sounds like a Mafia boss’s lawyer, only less believable.
I could vote third-party of course, as I have in the past, but that’s not super-appealing either. I would ordinarily lean toward the Libertarian ticket, featuring former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson and former Massachusetts governor Bill Weld, but their positions on a lot of issues I care about aren’t especially libertarian — Weld on Second Amendment rights sounds, well, like a Massachusetts governor, and Johnson seems to care more about marijuana rights than religious freedom. Besides, it’s hard to see them carrying a single state.
The quixotic candidacy of Evan McMullin, backed by some “NeverTrump” Republicans, seems even less likely to accomplish anything (except maybe keep some consultants employed). And I interviewed Green Party nominee Jill Stein last election cycle and she’s a nice lady, but her chances look even poorer, and her outright-socialist platform would be a disaster in the unlikely event she won.
So what to do? Well, the answer to me comes from a column by Bill McGurn in the Wall Street Journal, noting that the worst scandal in Hillary’s email scandal isn’t what Hillary did — we expect her to act like a crook — but rather that the supposedly professional, nonpartisan civil service rolled over for her, and even offered cover. As McGurn writes:
Even today her former department is still resisting efforts to make public the emails she tried to hide. Groups such as Judicial Watch have done yeoman’s work in forcing the emails into the sunlight—but they have also had to get court orders to pry them out of an obstructionist State Department.
It’s a disturbing pattern, and unfortunately it’s not limited to State. There have been similar questions about the integrity and professionalism of the IRS ever since the American people learned in 2013 that it was unfairly targeting conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.
Three years, many congressional hearings and disappearing hard drives later, there is still no evidence the IRS has ended the practice.
And the FBI and Department of Justice have seemed curiously uninterested in going after people for behavior that, in other circumstances, would be a surefire ticket to federal prison.
The reason, of course, is that the civil service, though supposedly professional and nonpartisan, has become a Democratic Party monoculture. Federal employees overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, donate to Democrats, and, by all appearances, cover for Democrats as a routine part of doing their job.
When Richard Nixon tried to weaponize the IRS, top officials at the Service made a stink. Under Obama, the IRS weaponized itself.
And, of course, the press is in the tank for the Democrats as usual. Bad news about Obama and Clinton has been soft-pedaled, with reporters sometimes admitting that they don’t want to help Trump.
So if the choice in 2016 is between one bad candidate and another (and it is) the question is, which one will do the least harm. And, judging by the civil service’s behavior, that’s got to be Trump. If Trump tries to target his enemies with the IRS, you can bet that he’ll get a lot of pushback — and the press, instead of explaining it away, will make a huge stink. If Trump engages in influence-peddling, or abuses secrecy laws, you can bet that, even if Trump’s appointees sit atop the DOJ or FBI, the civil service will ensure that things don’t get swept under the rug. And if Trump wants to go to war, he’ll get far more scrutiny than Hillary will get — or, in cases like her disastrous Libya invasion, has gotten.
So the message is clear. If you want good government, vote for Trump — he’s the only one who will make this whole checks-and-balances thing work.
Glenn Reynolds is a law professor at the University of Tennessee & the author of The New School: How the Information Age Will Save American Education from Itself & he is a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors.
This only proved that Hillary supporters and anti-Trump people are stupid and retarded.
Good that you see the point. That's why Australia refuses to take in refugees. That's why even the incompetent PAP knows better than to open the flood gates to the Rhoyingha.
If there is one axiom in international relations it is that no good deed ever goes unpunished.
Trump is correct on Syrian refugees and Hillary is wrong. Just as Angela Merkel was wrong. Look at how the supposed good deed was not only punished but savagely punished. These people value the lives of refugees over their citizens.
Another thing Trump has gotten right is the liberal media. The latter have promoted blind liberalism at the expense of national security. Lock them up!
BREAKING: HILLARY EMAIL FOUND SHOWING INSTRUCTIONS FOR KILLING CHRIS STEVENS
http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/09/1...instructions-for-killing-chris-stevens-2.html
Breaking News: DC Explosion Leaves Key Hillary Clinton Witness DEAD!!!
http://www.uspoliticslive.com/2016/...&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork
http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2016/09/1...instructions-for-killing-chris-stevens-2.html
Breaking News: DC Explosion Leaves Key Hillary Clinton Witness DEAD!!!
http://www.uspoliticslive.com/2016/...&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork
Her VP will be the lucky 1
An honest Muslim speak the truth about Hillary's supporters.
[video=youtube;leXvvk7inw0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leXvvk7inw0[/video]
[video=youtube;leXvvk7inw0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leXvvk7inw0[/video]
Similar threads
