• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat The facts behind the Laju Incident

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is today's press report by the Straits Time. Read this first and I fill in the gaps in my second post.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/steely-hero-of-laju-hostage-drama
Leading the Laju mission was one of S R Nathan’s key contributions

PUBLISHED6 HOURS AGO

The 1974 crisis ended smoothly, largely because of the clear-headed leadership of Nathan
Danson Cheong
In the long and remarkable career of SR Nathan, the Laju hijack of 1974 had all the ingredients of a thriller movie, with the future president of Singapore playing a starring role.

The young today may find it hard to reconcile the jocular grandfather figure with the steely hero of Singapore's hostage drama.

When he boarded the Japan Airlines plane at Paya Lebar Airport with Singapore government officials and commandos to guarantee the safe passage of four terrorists bound for Kuwait, Singapore and his family did not know if he and his team would make it home alive.

PUTTING NATION BEFORE SELF

An immediate worry was my family... My wife and children were bound to be concerned... When I left for the airport... I avoided looking at any of my family in the eye.

MR NATHAN, describing his reaction upon being given the mission of escorting the hijackers out of Singapore, in An Unexpected Journey: Path To The Presidency.
DANGEROUS MISSION

As soon as the aircraft came to a stop, it was tightly surrounded by a cordon of tanks, armoured vehicles and tens of soldiers armed with automatic weapons. The scene looked like the middle of a war zone.

MR NATHAN, describing the scene at Kuwait airport in An Unexpected Journey: Path To The Presidency.
A BRAVE LEADER

He was a good negotiator, a brave man in a foreign country. He took care of us, comforted us, and gave us direction.

Mr S R Nathan being greeted by his wife and children upon his safe return at the Singapore airport.

The drama was played out at a time when there was no Twitter, no Facebook and no live blog to give a blow-by-blow account of what happened.

What the Singaporean team had was guts and gumption.

Mr Saraj Din, 71, a former officer in the Internal Security Department (ISD), who was on the Feb 8 flight, said of Mr Nathan: "He managed to save all our lives when we were all very uncertain of the outcome."

The drama had started on Jan 31, when four terrorists equipped with sub-machine guns and explosives landed on Pulau Bukom.

Their plan was to blow up the Shell oil refinery on the island to disrupt the oil supply from Singapore to South Vietnam to show their support for communist North Vietnam during the Vietnam War.

Two were Arabs from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and two were Japanese nationals from the communist militant group Japanese Red Army. The two groups believed in changing the world through revolution, and trained together in guerilla warfare in the Middle East.

On Bukom, they planted explosives at three oil tanks but the blasts caused little damage, and the rest of the explosives failed to go off.

Chased by the police, the terrorists hijacked a ferry at Bukom jetty called Laju, or "fast" in Malay - and held five crew members hostage.

After six days of protracted negotiations, the bombers agreed to release the hostages in exchange for safe passage out of Singapore.

Their destination: an Arab country. But no one would take in the terrorists until another group of terrorists stormed the Japanese Embassy in Kuwait, taking hostages and demanding that the Japanese government send a plane to Singapore to take the Laju terrorists to Kuwait.

On Feb 7, the bombers were taken to Paya Lebar Airport, where they surrendered their weapons and released the remaining three hostages. Two hostages had escaped earlier.

The terrorists were to board a special flight to Kuwait on a plane loaned from Japan. But they had one condition: They demanded a group of guarantors to accompany them on the flight.

Then Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Goh Keng Swee needed a man who would not buckle under pressure to lead the dangerous mission.

He turned to Mr Nathan, then 49, and the director of Singapore's external intelligence agency, the Security and Intelligence Division (SID) in the Ministry of Defence.

Mr Nathan had been involved in the negotiations with the hijackers from the start.

The other 12 members of the team were drawn from government units handling the crisis: the ISD, police, Singapore Armed Forces commandos, and translators: Mr S. Rajagopal, Mr Saraj Din, Mr Tee Tua Ba, Mr Yoong Siew Wah, Mr Seah Wai Toh, Mr Andrew Tan, Mr Tan Kim Peng, Mr Gwee Peng Hong, Mr Teo Ah Bah, Mr Tan Lye Kwee, Haji Abu Bakar and Haji Rahman.

If Mr Nathan was afraid, he did not show it.

In separate interviews with The Straits Times and The New Paper decades after the incident, he recounted how he broke the news of the mission to his wife Urmila. Their children were then 15 and 11.

"I just looked at her and told her, 'I'm going'," Mr Nathan said.

"I knew it'd be very emotional for her and for my children... I had to display some confidence."

When he left for the airport, he avoided looking at any of his family members in the eye.

In an interview with The Straits Times, former ISD officer Rajagopal, 76, recalled then Minister for Home Affairs Chua Sian Chin telling the group at the airport on Feb 8: "Thanks for your service. If anything happens, we will take care of your family."

During the 13-hour flight, the thoughts swirling in Mr Nathan's head veered from the personal - Would he see his wife and children again? - to the practical - Would the plane be allowed to land in Kuwait or would they be forced to refuel and sent off elsewhere? Would the hijackers refuse to let the Singaporeans go and use them as bargaining chips? Everything was up in the air. But Mr Nathan steadied himself with these words: "Have faith and do your duty."

Demonstrating the diplomatic skills that he showed in the foreign service, he chatted with the terrorists and tried to win their trust.

Mr Tee, who was then 31 years old and the officer-in-charge of the Marine Police, recalled: "In the plane, Mr Nathan asked me to engage them, talk to them, and as I was talking to them he would join in."

Mr Tee, 74, later became Commissioner of Police.

"Mr Nathan was quite relaxed, because by that time the terrorists had surrendered their guns. He cracked some jokes, tried to break the ice."

Mr Nathan's goal was to establish rapport with the terrorists, in case negotiations soured and endangered the lives of the Singaporeans on board the plane.

When they landed in Kuwait before sunrise, they were greeted by a wall of tanks, armoured vehicles and soldiers.

It "looked like the middle of a war zone", Mr Nathan wrote in his 2011 memoirs, An Unexpected Journey: Path To The Presidency.

It became clear that getting the Singapore team off the plane was not one of the Kuwaitis' priorities. It seemed likely that the group of terrorists in the country would be bundled onto the plane and flown to a new destination with the Singaporeans on board.

But Mr Nathan had a plan, said Mr Tee. He told the air traffic controllers he had an important message from Singapore's Prime Minister and needed to speak to "somebody high up".

Tense hours passed. The group could not do anything but wait on the tarmac.

"For four to five hours, we were eating instant noodles in the plane and just waiting, so you can imagine our frame of mind," Mr Tee recalled.

Then a fleet of cars approached with lights flashing and sirens blaring. One of the cars, a Cadillac, carried the Kuwaiti Defence Minister, who had finally arrived to negotiate.

Mr Nathan pressed Singapore's position, which was that the team had done their part in bringing the hijackers to Kuwait. Subsequent negotiations were between the Kuwaiti and Japanese governments, and the Singaporeans should be allowed to return home. He stressed that the Singapore team was on Kuwait soil and thus came under the protection of the Kuwaiti government.

The Kuwaiti Defence Minister rebuffed him several times and told him to shut up.

At one point, he threatened to arrest Mr Nathan.

"Mr Nathan was very calm but very determined... It was not an easy situation to handle, how much can you push the line?" said Mr Tee.

The hours ticked by. Mr Nathan left the plane several times to negotiate with the Kuwaitis and the Japanese ambassador.

The breakthrough came with the arrival of Kuwait's Foreign Minister. After more talking, he finally told Mr Nathan: "All of you get down and get lost."

The Singapore delegation did as they were told.

The Kuwaiti Foreign Minister told Mr Nathan that the Singaporeans should make themselves scarce until their flight home was due, in case the hijackers demanded they be put back on the plane if negotiations with the Kuwaitis did not go well.

So the team did what Singaporeans do best - they went shopping. Mr Nathan gave each member of the team US$100 and they disappeared into a bazaar.

They met later that day to catch a Kuwaiti Airlines flight to Bahrain. From there, they boarded a Singapore Airlines flight home. They arrived in Singapore around sunset on Feb 9.

Mr Rajagopal described how Mr Nathan rose to the occasion: "He was a good negotiator, a brave man in a foreign country. He took care of us, comforted us, and gave us direction."

But the man of the hour did not make a big deal of the fraught situation. He told The New Paper: "It was a job I did. It was an episode we all wanted to forget."

A month before Mr Nathan stepped down as president in 2011, he invited the group involved in the Laju incident to tea at the Istana.

Mr Saraj said they talked about Singapore's tense formative years: battling the communists, racial unrest and other security problems.

"Young people these days see Mr Nathan as a father figure, but they don't know him in his younger days. The situation in Singapore then was entirely different."

It was a time for a generation of "pragmatic leaders" like Mr Nathan, who could handle these situations, said Mr Saraj.

"With the passing of Mr Nathan and Mr Lee Kuan Yew, that generation of leaders is largely gone."
 

cocobobo

Alfrescian
Loyal
to be honest, even if half the story is true, you can't help feel some pity for the fella.
he got thrown under the bus by his bosses, who knew the Kuwaitis didin't want the plane on their sand.
rightly so, when they landed, the Kuwaitis grumpily told him to fuck off.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
1) The Singapore Govt had no traction with the hijackers from the word go. The hijackers demanded to only negotiate with the Japanese Govt. The hijackers considered Singapore as a non-entity in the World stage. In the meantime 2 out of 5 hostages had escaped by jumping overboard and swimming away leaving 3 hostages.

2) When their red army counterparts captured the Japanese Embassy in Kuwait few days later, this dragged the Japanese Govt to negotiate and also brought in the Kuwait Govt. Singapore stood by while the actual negotiation and deal was done with the Japanese and Kuwait officials.

3) The terrorist demanded Japanese hostages (not Singapore hostages) to replace Singapore hostages and a JAL plane. The Japanese Govt agreed and 2 Senior Government Officials plus 12 JAL crew was offered.

4) At Paya Lebar Airport, the hijackers handed over the weapons and the 3 Singapore hostages after seeing the 2 Japanese Govt officials and the JAL Japanese Crew. The 13 Singaporeans then boarded the plane after the weapons were handed over.

5) Out of the 13 Singapore, there were 4 Commandoes led by (Clarence) Tan Kim Peng. Each of the Commandoes were assigned a specific hijacker to monitor to take on if even needed. They became the bodyguards for the 9 other Singaporeans. Yoong Siew Wah was Head of ISD then and the ISD team comprised Seah Wai Toh, Raja Gopal and Saraj Din. Seah Wai Toh 3 years alter also handled the hijacking of Vietnam airlines that landed at Seletar Airport. The Commandoes were led by Clarence Tan Kim Peng and comprised Gwee Peng Hong, Teo Ah Bah, Tan Lye Kwee.

6) When the 13 Singaporeans entered the plane, the hijackers had already given up their weapons and had 2 Japanese Sr govt officials and 12 JAL crew as replacement hostages. Much of the on-board conversation was among the Japanese. The Singaporeans sat there for the ride while one clown obviously tried to crack jokes which fell on deaf years.

7) When the plane landed in Kuwait. The Kuwait and Japanese Govt began the next stage of the negotiations. Apparently the Kuwait Govt had no idea that 13 Singaporeans were in the place. All they knew was that the hijackers had exchanged 3 Singaporean hostages for 2 Sr Senior Japanese Govt Officials and 12 JAL crew. Because of the confusion, the Singapore team was neglected. It took matter of minutes when the Kuwait Govt realised that there 13 Singaporeans after traffic controllers told them. The Kuwaits told them that they are no longer needed and do whatever they want to do.

Now you know the story by the Straits Times is inaccurate and misleading and creates a picture of danger for the 13 Singaporeans. I was pissed when they left out the 2 Japanese Sr Govt Officials and the 12 JAL Crew who volunteered for the mission and were the actual hostage replacements as demanded by the hijackers.

The reason it was 13 Singaporeans was for 2 reasons. The 4 Commandoes to act as bodyguard for the 9. The remaining 9 was because of inter-agency rivalry - ISD vs SID. Yoong as head of ISD felt that it was domestic event having taken place in Bukom and SID felt that it was an international incident and wanted control. To compromise, each side came up with own folks and thus it ballooned unnecessarily from each side. The 9th person was Tee Tua Bah who was Head of Marine Police and was involved directly from the first hour of hijacking and had been talking to the hijackers.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It's quite in order to accord ex-President SR Nathan a fitting narrative to his memory but quite a lot of the adulations are repetitious and some of his so-called achievements were really given a bit of cosmetic treatment. In any case, may the soul of eminent SR Nathan rest in peace

http://singaporerecalcitrant.blogspot.sg/
Singapore Recalcitrant
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
A poignant tribute to ex-President Ong Teng Cheong

It will be interesting to read what Yoong Siew Wah has to say about Nathan's role in the Laju incident
 
Last edited:

Brightkid

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sorry but did I missed the plot?

When the hijackers demanded Jap officials and JAL crew, how and why 13 sinkies are involved and volunteered back into the plane? Wouldn't it better to just let the plane fly off out of SG and then can wash hands of incident?

Sinkies were of no use in the hijackers after the exchange with Jap officials correct?
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
His job is blared and trumpted ad nauseam .He is paid to do his job.Poor sinkees were lambasted irritatingly by the mass media about his achievement.Past achievement do not equal future potential.He's paid about $48 million to do the job of president for 2 terms.
It's time to have a closure on him and move on.We Singapore taxpayers have already spent a fortune on him .Enough is enough.U ask the man in the street to name 10 things what the prataman have done for Singapore ? THEY HAVE NO IDEA.WHAT SERVICE ? WHAT SACRIFICE ? OH REALLY ?
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yes, that is the exactly the point. The hijackers were not interested in Singaporeans. As soon as the Japanese offered their 2 senior officials and the 12 JAL Crew and plane, the Singaporeans were not needed or asked for. The 13 just went for the ride after the weapons were taken away. It was a small nation that was looking for some glory in all this.

That is why the Kuwaits were lost when the Singaporeans appeared with the plane.

Sorry but did I missed the plot?

When the hijackers demanded Jap officials and JAL crew, how and why 13 sinkies are involved and volunteered back into the plane? Wouldn't it better to just let the plane fly off out of SG and then can wash hands of incident?

Sinkies were of no use in the hijackers after the exchange with Jap officials correct?
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yoong is in the same boat with Nathan on this. If the truth was revealed it will a laugh. I am shocked that the press did not mention the Japanese hostages that was offered.

Singapore Recalcitrant
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
A poignant tribute to ex-President Ong Teng Cheong

It will be interesting to read what Yoong Siew Wah has to say about Nathan's role in the Laju incident
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sorry but did I missed the plot?

When the hijackers demanded Jap officials and JAL crew, how and why 13 sinkies are involved and volunteered back into the plane? Wouldn't it better to just let the plane fly off out of SG and then can wash hands of incident?

Sinkies were of no use in the hijackers after the exchange with Jap officials correct?




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laju_incident

Laju incident

The Laju Incident, also known as the Laju Ferry Hijacking, occurred on 31 January 1974 in Singapore. Four armed men from the terrorist groups Japanese Red Army and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine attacked the Shell oil refinery complex on Pulau Bukom and later hijacked the ferryboat Laju and took its five crew members hostage. The crisis was resolved after the Singapore government provided the terrorists safe passage to the Middle East in exchange for the release of the hostages.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laju_incident
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is a classic example of what not to do during negotiations. Even Hollywood knows better.



NP_20150809_MSNDPLAJU-4ZR_957519.jpg



13+get+off.jpg
 

Force 136

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It's so wrong to give way to terrorists.....

They all should be shot and killed whatever the price.............. even if hostages are placed at risk.
 

sabasaba

Alfrescian
Loyal
Isn't it a coincident that during the high oil prices age in the early 70s this oil bombing incident happens. One wonder if the 'terrorists' are working for oil brokers.
 

sabasaba

Alfrescian
Loyal
A MediaCorp Caricature Presentation of the Laju Saga
Out of curiosity I watched the Days of Rage programme on channel 8 last night which was supposed to present the much-hyped Laju Saga in an objective light. I missed the English version of the programme when it was telecast earlier. After viewing the programme, to say that I was left in a state of shock is to put it mildly at the brazen self-glorification of their roles in the Laju Saga by some of the characters in the narrative.

To begin with the bomb attack on the Shell Oil Refinery in Pulau Bukom by four terrorists from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and the Japanese Red Army (JRA) and the subsequent hijacking of the ferry boat "Laju" with its crew were clearly terrorist activities which came under the jurisdiction of the Internal Security Department (ISD). The MediaCorp programme showed unmistakeably that the first report of the incident was made to SR Nathan who was the director of intelligence and had no jurisdiction over terrorist activities within Singapore. So the director of ISD was non-existent whoever wrote the script and whether this was claimed by SR Nathan in the script is significant.

SR Nathan was director of intelligence, the Singapore miniature equivalence of the British MI6 which deals more with spying. How on earth the MediaCorp can portray him so prominently in dealing with the Laju terrorists is mind-boggling, to say the least. And could this be something he presented to the script-writer? There is nothing wrong in wanting self-glorification but how would one describe it if it is done at the expense of riding roughshod over other well-deserving individuals? Would abject disgust be a reasonable description? Many of the roles which he had been portrayed by MediaCorp could be questionable. Of course there was no question that he had been appointed by the then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew to lead the team of Singapore officers to escort the Laju terrorists to Kuwait on 8 February 1974. And again there was a story about the appointment as the director ISD and his permanent secretary were having deep personal animosity.

The role of the then officer-in-charge of the Marine Police DSP Tee Tua Bah in handling the Laju terrorists had also been over-hyped by MediaCorp. The Marine Police is like other normal police divisions which deal with routine police and criminal matters and had hardly the expertise of dealing with terrorists. The Laju hijack happened in Singapore waters and quite rightly came within the jurisdiction of the Marine Police in the normal way. Had the MediaCorp interviewed former ISD officers, who were the rightful investigators in terrorism, as to what roles they had played in dealing with the Laju terrorists? Their daily appearance in their negotiations with the terrorists at the scene could not have been figment of imagination in the script-writer's mind?

One would have expected the MediaCorp to have more commonsense and humanistic consideration when writing out a script for a narrative, especially one like the Laju Saga. Had it not occurred to the MediaCorp to carry out a more comprehensive interview covering all the parties involved before composing the script? In the Laju Saga it is obvious that important parties had been left out for whatever reason best known to MediaCorp.

If it is not too much of a loss of face or a blemish on its pride, the MediaCorp should have the civility of sending a letter of apology to ISD for belittling its role in the Laju Saga.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is a classic example of what not to do during negotiations. Even Hollywood knows better.

This is the stupidest hostage handling situation I have seen beside the Pinoy swat team cockup.

U don't ever exchange hostages with a higher number of hostages who are more important! Where is the logic?!
 

Brightkid

Alfrescian
Loyal
I believe because of this incident, there was a change in the military/political doctrine under such, or any situation.

That the top gun, aka Generals, ministers, PM, all stand at the safest back end, in cool comfort of Aircon room, waiting for the runner to update the status from the front line where the lowly soldiers are fighting. Key events of such demonstrations recently included the Little Indian riot, the MRT failures, MRT tech accident, etc. you do not hear or see them much later when the coast is cleared.
 
Top