Look at this piece of shit. No different from Najib!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Cheebye Low TK : Not in jail means i didn't do wrong!
- Thread starter Scrooball (clone)
- Start date
Look at this piece of shit. No different from Najib!
Gongcheebye Cooleo/Scrooball tried. His report was rejected on the grounds of his mental retardation. 
why don't you make a police report?
The party in power be it NAJIB for UMNO in Malaysia or any PAP clowns in Singore will never go jail. Opposition members if can be found guilty on the flimsiest excuse sure kena jail, bankrupted or sent to ISD/IMH.
The fact that after years of fixing and auditing still cannot find sufficient evidence of wrong doing for conviction means absolutely NO CASE.
The fact that after years of fixing and auditing still cannot find sufficient evidence of wrong doing for conviction means absolutely NO CASE.
Teehee... That's why we need to vote the PAP out!
u whole family die by road side
So maybe someone should rape your wife and daughter. If the evidence is destroyed, they are not in the wrong! Oh dear....what a fucking moron u are! :p
Hey cunt, your mouth today super stink leh. Why don't you stop posting rubbish for just 1 day and it makes your mouth more cleaner ? LOL
Hey cunt, your mouth today super stink leh. Why don't you stop posting rubbish for just 1 day and it makes your mouth more cleaner ? LOL
your rapsit mouth is the worst of all por lan par
you should be in pap thread not here
You just don't get it.
PAP hired two PWC partners to do the audit ...they came out empty handed ....of course, they have to justify their fees, so they highlighted possible lapses. Tell me which organization or business have zero possible lapses in their processes? None. One could conjure out possible lapses in so many ways. Conclusion: PAP came out empty-handed.
PAP played up overpayment to maintenace service company by WP TC. Well, why doesn't PAP release the same information on the estate maintenance companies servicing PAP wards? No, it won't because the info would embarass the PAP. After making a big huha on a Saturday evening, PAP is tiam tiam on the issue.
The auditor of WP TC should sue MND and the Ministars for defamation!
PAP hired two PWC partners to do the audit ...they came out empty handed ....of course, they have to justify their fees, so they highlighted possible lapses. Tell me which organization or business have zero possible lapses in their processes? None. One could conjure out possible lapses in so many ways. Conclusion: PAP came out empty-handed.
PAP played up overpayment to maintenace service company by WP TC. Well, why doesn't PAP release the same information on the estate maintenance companies servicing PAP wards? No, it won't because the info would embarass the PAP. After making a big huha on a Saturday evening, PAP is tiam tiam on the issue.
The auditor of WP TC should sue MND and the Ministars for defamation!
You missed the point. It has nothing to do with evidence, it has to do with control of power.
It depends on whether the accused is in power or just a lesser mortal. Elites in power will never be guilty even if the evidence is NOT DESTROYED. An example is 3 PAP VIPs (not electoral candidates) can be inside a polling station and not convicted despite the rule that one cannot be loitering within 200m of a polling station.
Another case, HPL(Nassim Jade Condo discounts) where Lee dynasty enjoyed special discounts, when kena exposed, not arrested by CPIB because they returned the money.
If lesser mortal caught shop lifting, just return merchandise also kena jailed.
I read that statement by WP to imply a subtle confession that they did manipulate the town council. Just that *heng*, there was no evidence strong enough to bring them to court. Remember that feeling when you were young and not caught red handed for the things you did? Throughout the whole speech, there was never an upfront and straight response "We did not do anything wrong.". The whole speech was focused on why PAP got it wrong. You know the kind of thing little children do when they were caught.
PAP spent how many thousands to engage two PWC partners to audit the accounts and came out with nothing. But that didn't stop the PAP from making libelious statements in Parliament.
WP is just challenging the PAP to go after them.
Shamu is not doing justice to his NUS 1st Class Honors Degree in Law with his interpretation of LTK's words. To recap, LTK said if WP had done anything against the law, knowing PAP, they (WP) would be behind bars by now.
Well, I think you don't have to be a 1st Class Honors in Law to know that it's very different from saying "I can do anything I like because I don't go to jail".
For a start, Shamu being a Senior Counsel and Law Minister must surely know in Singapore, the burden of proof is on the party asserting that there has been wrongdoing, in this case, the PAP. You have to prove the truth of your assertion.
The fact is Shamu and his sidekick Khaw and Lawrence have failed to discharge the burden of proof. Now, I beginning to question the quality of NUS 1st Class Honors Degree in Law and the standard of Senior Counsels in Singapore, if he needs me to help him work backward:
1) The fact that LTK and SL are not in jail is because they have not been convicted in any court of law.
2) The fact that LTK and SL have not been convicted in any court of law is because they have not been charged by the AGC.
3) The fact that LTK and SL have not been charged by the AGC is because there is no evidence to suggest that they have committed any crime.
In other words, LTK is not saying WP can do anything because PAP cannot find evidence to charge them and put them in jail. Instead, LTK is saying despite PAP wanting to charge WP and put them in jail, PAP cannot do anything because there is simply no evidence.
Perhaps University of Mumbai is really better than NUS.
Well, I think you don't have to be a 1st Class Honors in Law to know that it's very different from saying "I can do anything I like because I don't go to jail".
For a start, Shamu being a Senior Counsel and Law Minister must surely know in Singapore, the burden of proof is on the party asserting that there has been wrongdoing, in this case, the PAP. You have to prove the truth of your assertion.
The fact is Shamu and his sidekick Khaw and Lawrence have failed to discharge the burden of proof. Now, I beginning to question the quality of NUS 1st Class Honors Degree in Law and the standard of Senior Counsels in Singapore, if he needs me to help him work backward:
1) The fact that LTK and SL are not in jail is because they have not been convicted in any court of law.
2) The fact that LTK and SL have not been convicted in any court of law is because they have not been charged by the AGC.
3) The fact that LTK and SL have not been charged by the AGC is because there is no evidence to suggest that they have committed any crime.
In other words, LTK is not saying WP can do anything because PAP cannot find evidence to charge them and put them in jail. Instead, LTK is saying despite PAP wanting to charge WP and put them in jail, PAP cannot do anything because there is simply no evidence.
Perhaps University of Mumbai is really better than NUS.
Last edited:
Easily explained in two words, Indian Snake...
halo lee si mi lyner the susa si boh
Similar threads
