SDP's (or rather Chee's) idea of a joint candidate was so flawed on so many regards. It was not, definitely not, akin the coalitions partiesin other countries as much as his posts on the SDP website said so. So now you have a sort of weak argument from Low. SDP's try was useless in the first place. Low isn't the best debater to argue but his argument stands better than SDP's/Chee's logic then.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Why criticise LTK's opposition unity impossible speech when you had SDP's?
- Thread starter steffychun
- Start date
Whatever had happened, happened. Whatever had been said, said.
Let's move on.
The voters shall decide if they trust more in WP, SDP or whatever P come the critical GE2016.
No, because this is a by-election and there is only one seat being contested. Otherwise in a general election there are more than enough seats to go around.
Similar threads
