• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

WP Chief agrees with DPM Teo: WP chose not to send Png to Parliament

skponggol

Alfrescian
Loyal
.....

http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...sue-an-attempt-to-sabotage-Pngs-campaign--Low

“Producing the NCMP ballot paper on stage, Mr Low said all the members of the losing East Coast GRC's team members were considered for the post, regardless of their personal inclination.

The decision lay solely with the party's Central Executive Committee (CEC), said Mr Low.”


Finally, Low Thia Khiang confesses, after much cross-examination, that the decision to send Gerald Giam, and not Png Eng Huat as NCMP, is solely decided by the Party CEC, regardless of Png Eng Huat’s ‘personal inclination’.

Png Eng Huat tries to pretend that he is more principled and honourable than his spineless WP comrades who had bowed down to be conferred with NCMP. But, Low Thia Khiang has double-confirmed that Png is deemed unqualified, unworthy than Gerald Giam (WP Pet Boy of the Year) and ‘Lao Cheow’ Eric Tan by CEC to be NCMP. He received a pathetic, miserable 1 vote.


.....
 

saratogas

Alfrescian
Loyal
On the safe side... WP now decided to push Mr Png into parliament becos after Yaw's sex affairs, who is the next best candidate?! Mr Png will never have sex scandal, his looks and age...
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
Anyone can have sex scandal no matter how ugly bro, including you.

Anyway, Teo Chee Hean spoke the truth and was proven correct once again.


BTW, there were 13 votes in total. If Gerald received only 7 votes and Png only 1 vote, the next best person is therefore not Png.
 
Last edited:

geylangchickenloyangduck

Alfrescian
Loyal
nah beh....neber judge a book by its cover. Just like not all ah peks or hum sup looking ones patronising Geylang. U even have school principal visiting underaged kweys...speaks as much.
 
Last edited:

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
.....

http://www.todayonline.com/Singapor...sue-an-attempt-to-sabotage-Pngs-campaign--Low

“Producing the NCMP ballot paper on stage, Mr Low said all the members of the losing East Coast GRC's team members were considered for the post, regardless of their personal inclination.

The decision lay solely with the party's Central Executive Committee (CEC), said Mr Low.”


Finally, Low Thia Khiang confesses, after much cross-examination, that the decision to send Gerald Giam, and not Png Eng Huat as NCMP, is solely decided by the Party CEC, regardless of Png Eng Huat’s ‘personal inclination’.

Png Eng Huat tries to pretend that he is more principled and honourable than his spineless WP comrades who had bowed down to be conferred with NCMP. But, Low Thia Khiang has double-confirmed that Png is deemed unqualified, unworthy than Gerald Giam (WP Pet Boy of the Year) and ‘Lao Cheow’ Eric Tan by CEC to be NCMP. He received a pathetic, miserable 1 vote.


.....

Back then, it is choosing of NCMP and WP felt that Gerald is a better choice.

Now, it is By-Election for a new MP for Hougang and WP feels that Png is the best choice.

What is wrong with the above? Do they contradict each other? Maybe those in the ivory towers can see. I peasant. Cannot see.
 

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
Anyone can have sex scandal no matter how ugly bro, including you.

Anyway, Teo Chee Hean spoke the truth and was proven correct once again.
banner3.cgi


BTW, there were 13 votes in total. If Gerald received only 7 votes and Png only 1 vote, the next best person is therefore not Png.

They were voting for the person to take the NCMP then. You mean they should just look at who got the 2nd highest vote then to name him as this By-Election candidate?

You cannot be serious right? There are two separate matters and the consideration factors are certainly different. If Eric Teo had not been so petty and left, he might be the one contesting.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
They were voting for the person to take the NCMP then. You mean they should just look at who got the 2nd highest vote then to name him as this By-Election candidate?

You cannot be serious right? There are two separate matters and the consideration factors are certainly different. If Eric Teo had not been so petty and left, he might be the one contesting.

Its about sending people to parliament isn't it? Wasn't that what WP themselve had been harping?
So its the same as sending someone to NCMP.

Teo was correct
 

skponggol

Alfrescian
Loyal
Back then, it is choosing of NCMP and WP felt that Gerald is a better choice.

Now, it is By-Election for a new MP for Hougang and WP feels that Png is the best choice.

What is wrong with the above? Do they contradict each other? Maybe those in the ivory towers can see. I peasant. Cannot see.


WP obviously feels that Gerald Giam, Low Thia Khiang's favourite Pet Boy, a much better debater and performer in Parliament to speak up on national issues than Png Eng Huat

But judging on Giam's disappointing non-performance and constant deer-in-the-headlight-look, one can imagine what kind of embarassment Png, who was deemed worse than Giam by WP bigwigs, would give if he ever gets to the Parliament.

But, at least, it would take the pressure off from Giam, as PAP would always turn their guns on WP's weakest link.

.....
 

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
is NCMP same as MP???

To this Kanina fella, seems to mean the same thing. Not sure if his brain was actually intact when he typed that.

I guess after taking instructions on what to say on forum to support the party for too long, the brain also shut off.
 

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
WP obviously feels that Gerald Giam, Low Thia Khiang's favourite Pet Boy, a much better debater and performer in Parliament to speak up on national issues than Png Eng Huat

But judging on Giam's disappointing non-performance and constant deer-in-the-headlight-look, one can imagine what kind of embarassment Png, who was deemed worse than Giam by WP bigwigs, would give if he ever gets to the Parliament.

But, at least, it would take the pressure off from Giam, as PAP would always turn their guns on WP's weakest link.

.....

Pet Boy? He got 7 votes. Must be a super popular pet boy.

Giam is still young. Exposing him as a NCMP might be better than just having him thrown straight into the parliament as an MP. No matter how badly he performed so far, he is still head and shoulder above TPL.
 

@rmadill0

Alfrescian
Loyal
WP obviously feels that Gerald Giam, Low Thia Khiang's favourite Pet Boy, a much better debater and performer in Parliament to speak up on national issues than Png Eng Huat

But judging on Giam's disappointing non-performance and constant deer-in-the-headlight-look, one can imagine what kind of embarassment Png, who was deemed worse than Giam by WP bigwigs, would give if he ever gets to the Parliament.

But, at least, it would take the pressure off from Giam, as PAP would always turn their guns on WP's weakest link.

.....

Pet Boy? He got 7 votes. Must be a super popular pet boy.

Giam is still young. Exposing him as a NCMP might be better than just having him thrown straight into the parliament as an MP. No matter how badly he performed so far, he is still head and shoulder above TPL.
 

skponggol

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pet Boy? He got 7 votes. Must be a super popular pet boy.

Giam is still young. Exposing him as a NCMP might be better than just having him thrown straight into the parliament as an MP. No matter how badly he performed so far, he is still head and shoulder above TPL.

He's Low Thia Khiang favourite Pet Boy of the Year...If not, how can he, a spring chicken who had just joined the Party for less than 2 years, was able to win more votes than a 'Lao Cheow' Eric Tan who was the leader of WP East Coast Ali Baba Team.

Png Eng Huat was obviously deemed less qualified by WP leaders than both Eric Tan the quitter, and Gerald Giam the deer-in-the-headlight.

.....
 

Huat-Ah

Alfrescian
Loyal
Well Well....Our Skponggol Hairless boy is talking again.

LOL

Anyway IMHO Png Eng Huat for the Hougang Candidate MIGHT give Workers Party Positive BE Results :biggrin:

Wait and see...
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Kinana said:
Anyone can have sex scandal no matter how ugly bro, including you.

Anyway, Teo Chee Hean spoke the truth and was proven correct once again.

What truth did TCH utter? That GG is best for Hougang? What was reviewed was that GG was the best (or most acceptable) man for the NCMP post and Png the best for Hougang. Nothing wrong with that.

Anyone can have sex scandal. How about you? How about PAP MPs?
 

zeddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Anyone can have sex scandal no matter how ugly bro, including you.

Anyway, Teo Chee Hean spoke the truth and was proven correct once again.


BTW, there were 13 votes in total. If Gerald received only 7 votes and Png only 1 vote, the next best person is therefore not Png.

Kinana, to celebrate my 5000th post in SBF, I'll present you with this small gift..

Have fun with it when you're bored at home..

Cucumber-UPR-low-res.gif
 
Last edited:

rusty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Anyone can have sex scandal no matter how ugly bro, including you.

Anyway, Teo Chee Hean spoke the truth and was proven correct once again.


BTW, there were 13 votes in total. If Gerald received only 7 votes and Png only 1 vote, the next best person is therefore not Png.

Honey,
You are correct anybody can have sex with you, including that ugly clown with big nose but don't ever get caught by me
I will deprive you of those orgasms which he can't deliver
We did 13 times a day during our last marathon pokes, 7 were below my bestest, one above average and yet you are complaining
Do you really want that honest bloke to be proven correct again and let the whole world know ?
If you want better results, get a good gynae to remove those sands and I will place some deposits if it is a requirement by the gahmen
 
Last edited:
Top