singapore - the next SUE HUB

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

who started this sue-ing game by the way? are the paps becoming "SUSSIEs"? or have they become so sensitive that like tissue papers tear up so easily when certain unpleasant remarks were hurled against them?

i remember they exhorting us to be "tolerant", be "kind", be gracious......look like what they really wanna tell us is "don't try to be funny, or BE FUCKED!"

sigh! pap is what paps should be. pap talk and pap smear. kek sim!! :(

laksaboy · Mar 2, 2012

The Lees and the shitskins.

All litigious bastards.

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

SINGAPORE SUE HUB simply means if u ve money, u sue. if u don't have money, then prepared to be sued.

in simple term, no money not suppose to talk. you can only praise, admire, drool and lick :(

Ramseth · Mar 2, 2012

Singapore is not the next sue hub. Singapore is the sue hub now. The suing business contributes significally to the economy. It creates jobs for cour clerks, judges, lawyers etc.

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

the SUE game by the usual sussies has for sometime not happening. looks like now, sussies are getting itchy. they are foreplaying with threats. when they proceed action, u bet your arse that they will milk u till u r cum dry! and yes, after u r fully deflated u must tell them "sorry and thank you".

Cestbon · Mar 2, 2012

All no ball only sue within Singapore. PM/President/Ministers/Mps dare not sue others outside Singapore border.

Ramseth · Mar 2, 2012

Cestbon said:
All no ball only sue within Singapore. PM/President/Ministers/Mps dare not sue others outside Singapore border.

LKY sued Devan Nair in Canada.

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

Cestbon said:
All no ball only sue within Singapore. PM/President/Ministers/Mps dare not sue others outside Singapore border.

sgp did win a tiny piece of seagull shits covered rock from the matland, didn't we?

Cestbon · Mar 2, 2012

Ramseth said:
LKY sued Devan Nair in Canada.

We all know the story. Canada throw out the case. Like throw the file into dustbin.
Why LKY dont dare to sue in Canadian court?

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

what's the different from sussie and pussie?

answer: no difference. sussies are pussies!! the very tight ones that is. :P

Narong Wongwan · Mar 2, 2012

Ramseth said:
LKY sued Devan Nair in Canada.

......and lost

laksaboy · Mar 2, 2012

Cestbon said:
We all know the story. Canada throw out the case. Like throw the file into dustbin.
Why LKY dont dare to sue in Canadian court?

He knows his antics only work in Singapore's kangaroo court.

The entire Singapore judiciary puckers up to his wrinkly ass, so how independent is the judiciary, you know, I know, everyone knows. But you can't say it out openly. Contempt of court.

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

Cestbon said:
We all know the story. Canada throw out the case. Like throw the file into dustbin.
Why LKY dont dare to sue in Canadian court?

wonder was that sufficient to prove that the powderful here would always remain sussies. they sue we C (die). so better praise, admire, drool and lick.

Cestbon · Mar 2, 2012

leetahbar said:
sgp did win a tiny piece of seagull shits covered rock from the matland, didn't we?

That is a way to settle dispute. If not there will be war like Falklands War.
If that happen whose will WIN????

leetahbar · Mar 2, 2012

if we feel that if one is wrongfully sue and that he's just too weak to defend, would there be chilvary in us to really go out there, stand up for him, giving moral support to the extreme of protesting?

er......maybe if he were to be a BURMESE, maybe. if not then, the poor chap is left to die as in you die, your business :(

CHILVARY IS VERY DEAD!!

legal_bastard · Mar 2, 2012

leetahbar said:
SINGAPORE SUE HUB simply means if u ve money, u sue. if u don't have money, then prepared to be sued.

in simple term, no money not suppose to talk. you can only praise, admire, drool and lick :(

spot on ! damm right.
im living in this situation one....
im the one with no money, no talk
no money also in my case, means i tell lies, and the other side with money speak nothing but the truth

leetahbar · Mar 3, 2012

the latest is pap vickram nair's intention to sue namely ng ejay's article in TOC.

in any which case, vikram insinuated that chen show mao's social investment proposal as a akin to a "nigerian scam", would wp sue too?

the SUE GAME is usually initiated by the pap camp. more than often the defendants would lose big time. is there any easiest way to SUE for a living?

leetahbar · Mar 3, 2012

for the records, how many casualties or victims have the pap claimed over the years? this cannot be true isn't it? pappies remaining the ultimate sussies and the people still choose to remain as silent pussies.

28yoman · Mar 3, 2012

leetahbar said:
who started this sue-ing game by the way? are the paps becoming "SUSSIEs"? or have they become so sensitive that like tissue papers tear up so easily when certain unpleasant remarks were hurled against them?

i remember they exhorting us to be "tolerant", be "kind", be gracious......look like what they really wanna tell us is "don't try to be funny, or BE FUCKED!"

sigh! pap is what paps should be. pap talk and pap smear. kek sim!! :(

Suing someone is a clear sign of civility. Singaporeans have progressed from settling their differences based on fights to settling it based on the law. This is a good sign of progress. It is like training a dog not to bite anymore.

leetahbar · Mar 4, 2012

28yoman said:
Suing someone is a clear sign of civility. Singaporeans have progressed from settling their differences based on fights to settling it based on the law. This is a good sign of progress. It is like training a dog not to bite anymore.

i repeate: the rich and powderful sue; the poor and weak just prepard themselves to be sued. only the rich and powderful are entitled to integrity, reputation and of course, their rights to sue. the poor and weak just have to remain silent. or else be sued and screwed.

sometime it doesn't need solid facts to prove. the writings are already there on the wall. everyone sees it but all are silent until someone naively enough to voice it. that's when the suing starts. those who are quiet are safe while the one who spoke would have to face the music.

the question i wanna know now is whether the silently majority still have their chilvary intact to stand up for the one who spoke out the words they dread to speak?

silent?......so be it :(

singapore - the next SUE HUB

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian (Inf)

Alfrescian

Alfrescian

Alfrescian

Alfrescian

Alfrescian

Alfrescian

Similar threads