Search results

It is good that these questions were raised in Parliament, and somewhat surprising that Bloomberg’s lawyers did not capitalize on these developments. Even before MP Louis Chua posed his question on 5 February 2025, additional queries regarding the purchase of GCBs through trusts had been tabled...

Tiagong buyer's lawyer is A&G, and seller's lawyer also A&G. Different lawyers working in the same law firm. Buyer's lawyer knows the identity of the UBO but he will not tell seller's lawyer. Very professional one.

@Sustanon SBPSBHJ ?

Singh scores in Court today !

I believe many uncles lost gallons of semen into the toilet because of her.:biggrin:

But when she was young, she really SBPSBHJ.

No prize for the right answer :tongue:

At the time of paying, no need. Applying for refund, you need.

KNN, TS early in the morning so horny ... always scouting for KYM chiobu :rolleyes:

Next level is "Blow Your Dick" ?

However, it's only for landed residential property. This is why the famous $3 billion money laundering by the Tiongs involved only condominiums which does not require beneficial owners to be made known to SLA.

According to Edwin Tong, SLA will know the identity of the beneficial owner under the trust, but the information will not be made public:

I do not disagree with you on the regulatory aspect. However, the current case is NOT about any alleged failings on the part of Shan as a Minister or the regulatory authorities. It concerns the alleged innuendos arising from the Bloomberg report and whether they would lead members of the public...

Lexus GS 300 is the benchmark for successful Singaporeans.

You don't have to avoid them. If you are not a "threat" to them, they will avoid you.

The article mischaracterizes the Minister’s admission in court as part of his defence, thereby creating the false impression that he is a defendant in a money laundering trial when he is in fact the plaintiff in a defamation action. It then relies on that same admission to support the...

Bloomberg is not winning, and it has nothing to do with the public perception of our courts.

This is fully in cash:

What does $88m paid fully in cash mean ? Cashier's order considered paid in cash ?